skills/legal/protest-notice/SKILL.md
Drafts a formal Notice of Intent to Protest Award for federal contracts under FAR 33.103, 33.104, and 4 C.F.R. Part 21. Use when a client receives an adverse contract award decision and must preserve GAO protest rights within the 10-day jurisdictional deadline. Covers bid protests, stay of performance requests, and contracting officer notifications.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills protest-noticeInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Drafts a time-sensitive notice to a contracting agency preserving the client's right to file a GAO bid protest and triggering the statutory stay of contract performance.
| Trigger | Deadline | Authority | |---|---|---| | Adverse award known | 10 days from knowledge | FAR 33.103(e); 4 C.F.R. § 21.2(a)(2) | | Post-debriefing | 10 days from debriefing | 4 C.F.R. § 21.2(a)(2) | | Solicitation impropriety pre-close | Before proposal due date | 4 C.F.R. § 21.2(a)(1) | | Formal protest after this notice | 10 days from notice filing | 4 C.F.R. § 21.2(a)(3) |
These deadlines are jurisdictional — missing them is fatal.
[Firm Letterhead]
[Date]
VIA [EMAIL/CERTIFIED MAIL/HAND DELIVERY]
[Contracting Officer Name & Title]
[Agency / Office / Address]
RE: Notice of Intent to Protest Award
Solicitation No. [NUMBER]
[Procurement Title]
Award Date: [DATE] / Date of Knowledge: [DATE]
Establish interested party standing under 31 U.S.C. § 3551(2) and 4 C.F.R. § 21.0(a)(1):
| Element | Show | |---|---| | Timely proposal | Conforming proposal submitted | | Direct economic interest | Next in line or substantial chance of award | | Competitive prejudice | Errors directly affected competitive position |
Strengthen with: competitive range inclusion, incumbent status, debriefing inconsistencies.
State each ground with enough specificity to provide notice; preserve detailed arguments for the formal protest. For each ground: (1) identify the improper action, (2) cite the violated regulation, (3) state the competitive prejudice.
Categories:
Invoke automatic stay under FAR 33.104(c) and 31 U.S.C. § 3553(d):
Respectfully submitted,
[Signature]
[Name], [Title], [Bar Admissions]
[Firm / Address / Email / Phone]
Date: [DATE]
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on [DATE], a copy of this Notice was served on
[Contracting Officer Name] at [Agency] via [method].
[Signature]
Key changes:
tags from frontmatter (not part of the spec)description — same coverage in fewer tokensdevelopment
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.