skills/legal/preservation-law-summary/SKILL.md
Generates structured legal memoranda on historic preservation law covering NHPA, Penn Central takings analysis, designation processes, and state-local regulatory frameworks. Use when summarizing preservation jurisprudence, Section 106 review, landmark regulations, cultural resource protection, or takings challenges to preservation ordinances.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills preservation-law-summaryInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Produces a thematically organized legal memorandum synthesizing historic preservation statutes, case law, and regulatory frameworks across federal, state, and local levels.
Gather before drafting:
[VERIFY]Format as a professional legal memorandum with Bluebook citations.
Organize by topic, not chronologically. Each section synthesizes statutes + case law.
| Topic | Key Authorities | Coverage | |-------|----------------|----------| | Designation criteria & procedures | NHPA §106, state register statutes | Listing standards, landmark criteria, district designation | | Regulatory authority | Local preservation ordinances | Alterations, demolitions, certificates of appropriateness | | Takings challenges | Penn Central v. NYC, 438 U.S. 104 (1978) | Three-factor test, economic impact, investment-backed expectations | | Tax incentives & economics | IRC §47, state credits | Federal 20% credit, state incentives, economic hardship | | Enforcement & remedies | Varies by jurisdiction | Penalties, injunctive relief, citizen suits | | Intersections | NEPA, Section 106, local zoning | Environmental review overlay, adaptive reuse |
For each significant case:
**[Case Name], [Citation]**
- Property: [type and significance]
- Challenge: [restriction at issue]
- Holding: [ruling]
- Reasoning: [key points]
- Impact: [practical implications]
| Element | Standard | |---------|----------| | Historical significance | National Register criteria A–D | | Architectural integrity | Seven aspects (location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, association) | | Economic hardship | Reasonable return analysis, maintenance cost evidence | | Administrative appeals | Exhaust before judicial review in most jurisdictions |
[VERIFY]; cite all assertions to primary authoritydevelopment
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.