casemark/order-judgment-appeal
skills/legal/order-judgment-appeal/SKILL.md
Drafts a U.S. appellate Order and Judgment memorializing disposition after review of a lower-court ruling. Covers captioning, jurisdictional recitals, standards of review, issue-by-issue holdings, remand directives, costs, and mandate language. Use when preparing an appellate order, judgment, disposition, affirm/reverse/remand order, or mandate-ready directive.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills order-judgment-appealInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Sep 3, 2026, 4:03 AM152.9s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- order-judgment-appeal
- language:
- en
- description:
- Drafts a U.S. appellate Order and Judgment memorializing disposition after review of a lower-court ruling. Covers captioning, jurisdictional recitals, standards of review, issue-by-issue holdings, remand directives, costs, and mandate language. Use when preparing an appellate order, judgment, disposition, affirm/reverse/remand order, or mandate-ready directive.
Order and Judgment on Appeal
Produces a final, enforceable appellate order and judgment stating jurisdiction, analysis, and disposition.
Prerequisites
- Appellate and lower-court case numbers
- Party names with procedural roles (appellant, appellee, intervenor)
- Trial judge name and date of order/judgment under review
- Notice of appeal filing date and jurisdictional basis
- Issues on appeal with applicable standards of review
- Record citations for key facts and rulings
- Disposition instructions (affirm/reverse/vacate/modify/remand)
- Costs/fees authority and mandate issuance rule
Quick Start
Draft in sequence: caption → jurisdiction → issues/standards → analysis → disposition → remand (if any) → costs/mandate → authentication.
Output Structure
1. Caption Block
[APPELLATE COURT NAME] [Division / District]
[Case Caption] Appellate Case No. [] Trial Court No. [] Trial Judge: [___]
ORDER AND JUDGMENT [Date]
2. Jurisdiction and Procedural History
Concise chronological summary establishing:
- Appealed order/judgment and date
- Timely notice of appeal
- Issues presented
- Briefing and oral argument status
- Standard(s) of review for each issue
3. Issues and Standards of Review
| Issue | Standard of Review | Record Reference | |---|---|---| | [Issue 1] | De novo / abuse of discretion / clearly erroneous / substantial evidence | [Cite] |
4. Analysis and Holdings
Per issue:
Issue [#]. [Statement] Standard of Review: [standard] Holding: [affirm/reverse/modify/vacate] Reasoning: [1–3 sentences with controlling authority and record cite]
5. Disposition
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
- The [trial court order/judgment] is [affirmed/reversed/vacated/modified] as to [Issue].
- The matter is [remanded] for [specific action].
- [Costs/fees disposition].
6. Remand Instructions (if applicable)
Specify:
- Scope of remand and required proceedings
- Limits on trial court discretion
- Jurisdiction retained or returned
- Deadline or timeline if imposed
7. Costs, Fees, and Mandate
Costs on appeal are awarded to [party] pursuant to [authority]. Attorney's fees on appeal are [granted/denied] and [remanded for determination / set at $X]. The mandate shall issue [date/under rule].
8. Authentication
DATED: [Date]
[Presiding Judge/Justice], [Title]
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Court
Pitfalls
- Maintain neutral judicial tone — not advocacy
- State the standard of review explicitly for every issue
- Separate each issue's outcome in the disposition — no ambiguity
- If modifying or remanding, specify exact changes or required actions
- Use jurisdiction-specific formatting and citation rules
- Include mandate language if required by local rule
- Mark uncertain authority with
[VERIFY]
Related Skills
casemark/medical-records-gap-analysis
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Sep 3, 2026
casemark/private-placement-memo
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/privacy-law-updates
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/prior-art-summary
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026