skills/legal/notice-of-appeal-criminal/SKILL.md
Drafts Notices of Appeal for criminal matters with strict compliance to FRAP 4(b) deadlines, jurisdictional statements, transcript requests, and service requirements. Use when filing a criminal appeal, initiating appellate review after conviction or sentencing, or preparing post-trial appellate filings.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills notice-of-appeal-criminalInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Drafts a procedurally compliant Notice of Appeal initiating appellate jurisdiction in a criminal matter, preserving rights within strict filing deadlines.
Collect before drafting — do not guess dates or case numbers:
| Jurisdiction | Deadline | Authority | |---|---|---| | Federal | 14 days from judgment entry | FRAP 4(b)(1)(A) | | State (typical) | 30–60 days | Varies by state rule |
Missing by one day = permanent loss of appellate rights. Always calculate and state the deadline explicitly.
NOTICE OF APPEAL — bold, centered, all capsAppellant (Defendant): Full legal name matching judgment exactly (suffixes, a/k/a). Incarceration details if applicable (facility, city, state, inmate number). Mailing address, phone.
Appellee (Prosecution): Formal designation as in trial court caption — "The State of [X]" / "The People of the State of [X]" / "The Commonwealth of [X]" / "United States of America." Prosecuting office address, assigned ADA/AUSA if known.
Template:
Defendant-Appellant [FULL NAME] hereby appeals to the [APPELLATE COURT] from the [Judgment/Sentence/Order] entered by the [TRIAL COURT] on [DATE], in Case No. [NUMBER], the Honorable [JUDGE NAME] presiding.
Specify scope: conviction + sentence, sentence only, or specific counts. If limited, state what is not challenged.
Concise summary: trial type and dates, plea terms, each count (offense, citation, degree), sentence per count (imprisonment, fines, restitution, supervision), aggregate sentence, presiding judge(s).
Numbered list. Common categories:
| Category | Examples | |---|---| | Sufficiency of evidence | No rational trier of fact could find elements beyond reasonable doubt | | Jury instruction error | Misstatement of law, omitted elements, refused defense instructions | | Evidentiary error | Improper admission (hearsay, 4th Amend., Confrontation, FRE 403/404(b)) or exclusion | | Prosecutorial misconduct | Improper argument, burden shifting, Brady violation | | Ineffective assistance | Strickland deficient performance + prejudice (often better for post-conviction) | | Constitutional violations | 4th, 5th, 6th Amendment; due process; speedy trial | | Sentencing error | Exceeds statutory max, Apprendi/Blakely, guideline miscalculation |
No frivolous claims — attorney signature certifies good faith (FRAP 38).
One of:
Parties served, method (personal, mail, certified, e-filing), date of service.
Counsel: "Respectfully submitted," signature, printed name, bar number, firm, address, phone, email.
Pro se: Signature, printed name, address, phone, date.
development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.