skills/legal/motion-new-trial/SKILL.md
Drafts a post-verdict Motion for New Trial in criminal defense cases. Structures arguments around recognized grounds (weight-of-evidence, newly discovered evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, juror misconduct, IAC, judicial error) with record citations. Use when filing a motion for new trial, post-conviction motion, or requesting the court set aside a criminal verdict.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills motion-new-trialInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Drafts a motion asking the trial court to set aside a jury verdict and order a new trial, with ground-by-ground legal and factual support from the trial record.
Standard jurisdiction-format caption. Include court name, case number, defendant's full legal name. Title: "DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL."
| Element | Content | |---|---| | Procedural authority | Specific rule and statutory basis | | Verdict date & charges | Conviction counts identified | | Relief sought | New trial; evidentiary hearing if applicable | | Thesis | One sentence on why the verdict should be set aside |
Draft each ground as a separate labeled section. Include only grounds supported by the record.
Per-ground structure:
Grounds checklist (assert only those supported):
| Ground | Key Elements | Standard | |---|---|---| | Weight of evidence | Miscarriage of justice despite jury deference | Unconscionable to let verdict stand | | Newly discovered evidence | (1) Post-trial discovery, (2) due diligence, (3) material/not cumulative, (4) probably different result | All four prongs required | | Prosecutorial misconduct | Specific acts depriving defendant of fair trial | Conduct undermined fundamental fairness | | Juror misconduct | Extraneous info, improper communications, undisclosed bias | Reasonable possibility misconduct influenced verdict | | IAC | (1) Below professional standards, (2) prejudice | Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) | | Judicial/legal error | Erroneous rulings affecting substantial rights | Abuse of discretion; not harmless beyond reasonable doubt |
For each ground: legal standard → controlling authority → application to facts. Bluebook citation format. Distinguish unfavorable precedent explicitly.
tools
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
development
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
data-ai
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
testing
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.