skills/capital/modeling-share-repurchase-optimization/SKILL.md
Analyzes buyback program design with timing optimization, price sensitivity, and EPS accretion impact modeling. Use when optimizing buybacks, modeling repurchase economics, or comparing return-of-capital alternatives.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills modeling-share-repurchase-optimizationInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Analyzes buyback program design with timing optimization, price sensitivity, and EPS accretion impact modeling.
Establish baseline EPS trajectory — Project quarterly EPS for 4–8 quarters with no repurchase activity. Include existing dilution from stock-based compensation and convertible instruments.
Define repurchase scenarios — Build at least three execution scenarios:
Model shares retired per period — For each scenario, calculate shares purchased = dollars deployed / assumed average purchase price. Apply volume constraints (Rule 10b-18: 25% of trailing 20-day ADTV). Reduce diluted share count each period by cumulative repurchased shares minus ongoing SBC dilution.
Calculate EPS accretion — Compare pro forma EPS (net income / reduced share count) against the baseline. If debt-funded, reduce net income by after-tax interest expense on incremental borrowings. Express accretion as both cents-per-share and percentage uplift.
Build price sensitivity matrix — Vary the average repurchase price (e.g., -20% / -10% / current / +10% / +20%) and show resulting shares retired, EPS accretion, and implied buyback yield (EPS accretion / price premium paid).
Compare return-of-capital alternatives — Model the same dollar amount deployed as:
Run sensitivity and breakeven analysis — Identify the breakeven repurchase price at which buyback accretion equals zero (the price where cost of retired equity equals earnings yield). Stress-test against FCF shortfall (what happens if cash generation misses plan by 20%?) and rising rates (if debt-funded, at what rate does accretion turn negative?).
Assess leverage and rating impact — Calculate pro forma net debt / EBITDA after repurchase. Flag if leverage exceeds rating agency thresholds for current credit rating [VERIFY: confirm relevant agency trigger levels for the issuer's rating category].
development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.