- name:
- managing-fiduciary-compliance
- language:
- en
- description:
- Evaluates advisory practices against fiduciary standards with conflict identification and disclosure requirements. Use when assessing fiduciary duties, managing conflicts of interest, or documenting fiduciary compliance.
- author:
- casemark
Managing Fiduciary Compliance
Evaluates advisory practices against fiduciary standards, identifies conflicts of interest, and documents compliance with duty-of-care and duty-of-loyalty obligations across investment advisory, ERISA, and trust fiduciary frameworks.
When To Use
- Assessing whether an RIA, broker-dealer, or plan fiduciary meets applicable fiduciary standards
- Reviewing conflict-of-interest inventories and disclosure adequacy (Form ADV Part 2A, Form CRS, 408(b)(2) disclosures)
- Evaluating compensation structures, revenue-sharing arrangements, or proprietary product usage for fiduciary risk
- Preparing for SEC examination readiness or DOL fiduciary audits
- Documenting best-interest determinations under Reg BI or the DOL fiduciary rule
- Reviewing ERISA plan sponsor oversight of service providers and fee reasonableness
Inputs To Gather
- Entity type and registration status: RIA, dual-registrant, bank trust department, ERISA plan fiduciary, or private trustee
- Applicable fiduciary standard: Investment Advisers Act §206, ERISA §404/§406, state trust codes, Reg BI (for dual-registrants) [VERIFY jurisdiction-specific standards]
- Conflict inventory: All material conflicts including proprietary products, affiliate transactions, soft-dollar arrangements, revenue sharing, 12b-1 fees, principal trading
- Disclosure documents: Form ADV Parts 1/2A/2B, Form CRS, ERISA 408(b)(2) service provider disclosures, trust account disclosures
- Compensation and fee schedules: Advisory fees, wrap fees, commissions, performance fees, transaction-based charges
- Client/beneficiary profile: Account types, investment mandates, risk tolerances, ERISA plan type (defined benefit vs. defined contribution)
- Policies and procedures: Compliance manual sections on conflicts, trading, allocation, best execution, proxy voting, gifts/entertainment
- Prior examination findings: SEC deficiency letters, DOL investigation results, internal audit reports
Workflow
-
Determine fiduciary framework
- Classify the entity's fiduciary status (federal vs. state, statutory vs. common law)
- Identify which standard applies: Advisers Act (SEC), ERISA (DOL), state UPIA/UTC, or Reg BI hybrid [VERIFY applicable regulatory regime]
- Note any exemptions or safe harbors (e.g., ERISA §408 prohibited transaction exemptions, QPAM exemption)
-
Map conflicts of interest
- Catalog all compensation sources and economic incentives that could bias recommendations
- Classify each conflict by severity: inherent (must disclose), manageable (mitigate and disclose), or prohibited (must eliminate)
- Cross-reference conflicts against current disclosure documents for completeness gaps
- Flag undisclosed or inadequately disclosed conflicts
-
Evaluate duty-of-care compliance
- Assess investment due diligence processes: research, selection criteria, monitoring frequency
- Review suitability/best-interest documentation for representative client accounts
- Check best-execution practices: broker selection, trade cost analysis, soft-dollar compliance (§28(e) safe harbor if applicable)
- Evaluate proxy voting policies and record-keeping
-
Evaluate duty-of-loyalty compliance
- Review fee reasonableness relative to services provided and industry benchmarks
- Examine proprietary product allocation rates and whether open-architecture alternatives were considered
- Assess principal and agency cross-trading controls [VERIFY SEC no-action letter requirements]
- Review gift, entertainment, and political contribution policies for adequacy
-
Assess disclosure adequacy
- Compare conflict inventory against Form ADV Part 2A Item 10/11/12/14 disclosures
- Evaluate Form CRS relationship summary for accuracy and plain-language clarity
- For ERISA fiduciaries, verify 408(b)(2) and 404a-5 participant disclosure compliance [VERIFY current DOL disclosure requirements]
- Identify gaps between actual practices and written disclosures
-
Document findings and remediation plan
- Prioritize findings by regulatory risk (examination risk, enforcement risk, litigation risk)
- Assign remediation owners, deadlines, and verification steps
- Track policy/procedure updates required and disclosure amendment timelines
Output
The fiduciary compliance report should include:
- Executive summary: Overall compliance posture rating (satisfactory, needs improvement, deficient) with key risk areas highlighted
- Fiduciary framework classification: Applicable standards, registration status, and exemptions relied upon
- Conflict inventory matrix: Each conflict listed with severity rating, current mitigation measure, disclosure reference, and gap assessment
- Duty-of-care findings: Investment process adequacy, best-execution compliance, documentation sufficiency
- Duty-of-loyalty findings: Fee reasonableness analysis, proprietary product review, prohibited transaction assessment
- Disclosure gap analysis: Side-by-side comparison of actual practices versus current disclosure language
- Remediation tracker: Prioritized action items with owners, deadlines, and regulatory risk ratings
- Examination readiness score: Assessment of preparedness for SEC or DOL examination on fiduciary topics
Quality Checks
- Every identified conflict has a corresponding disclosure reference or is flagged as a gap
- Fee reasonableness analysis uses current industry benchmark data, not outdated comparisons
- Fiduciary standard citations reference the correct statutory authority for the entity type [VERIFY specific Code/CFR sections]
- Prohibited transaction analysis distinguishes between structural exemptions and individual exemptions
- ERISA findings clearly separate plan-level fiduciary duties from participant-level obligations
- Remediation items are specific and actionable — not generic recommendations like "improve compliance"
- Report distinguishes between regulatory requirements (must do) and best practices (should do)
- All jurisdiction-dependent conclusions are marked with [VERIFY] for legal review