skills/legal/legal-opinion-letter/SKILL.md
Drafts formal legal opinion letters for corporate and transactional matters with jurisdiction-specific analysis, calibrated conclusion language, and comprehensive qualifications. Use when drafting closing opinion letters, third-party reliance opinions, enforceability opinions, or corporate authority opinions for mergers, acquisitions, financings, or regulatory compliance.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills legal-opinion-letterInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Produces a formal opinion letter with structured sections: scope, factual recitation, legal analysis, calibrated conclusions, and qualifications. Ensures proper assumptions, citation standards, and reliance limitations.
Gather before drafting:
Draft the following sections in order:
Firm letterhead, date, recipient, and "Re:" line. One paragraph identifying the relationship, transaction, and purpose.
Number each legal question being answered. Explicitly exclude out-of-scope matters:
| Excluded Matter | Note | |---|---| | Tax consequences | Advise client to consult tax counsel | | Securities law compliance | Advise client to consult securities counsel | | Antitrust / regulatory | Note if applicable | | Business judgment / wisdom | Outside legal analysis | | Laws of non-covered jurisdictions | Identify which are covered |
Enumerated list with full titles, execution dates, parties, and relevant sections.
Material facts only. Categorize each:
Include standard assumptions (tailor as needed):
For each scoped question: state applicable law with full citation, apply rule to facts, address counterarguments or ambiguities. Where authority is split, acknowledge directly and explain basis for preferring one line.
Citation standards:
[VERIFY]Use calibrated language matched to confidence:
| Confidence | Language | |---|---| | High (clear law, undisputed facts) | "It is our opinion that..." | | Moderate (some ambiguity) | "It is our opinion that it is more likely than not that..." | | Predictive (court outcome) | "We believe a court would likely conclude that..." | | Conditional | "Assuming [X], it is our opinion that..." |
Number conclusions parallel to the scoped questions.
Attorney name, bar admission (jurisdiction, number), title, firm, contact. For firm opinions, clarify signing capacity and whether institutional.
[VERIFY]development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.