skills/legal/jurisdictional-statement/SKILL.md
Drafts jurisdictional statements for U.S. appellate courts establishing authority to hear an appeal, procedural compliance, and timeliness. Covers 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291/1292, FRAP Rule 4, state appellate rules, finality analysis, interlocutory exceptions, tolling, and cross-appeals. Use when preparing appellate filings, jurisdictional briefs, or responding to jurisdictional challenges.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills jurisdictional-statementInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Drafts a jurisdictional statement establishing appellate authority and procedural compliance to prevent dismissal for want of jurisdiction.
Gather before drafting:
Format per the appellate court's local rules. Include: full court name, all parties with appellate designations, both trial and appellate case numbers, and document title per court rules.
Identify the applicable grant of appellate jurisdiction:
| Basis | Authority | Scope | |-------|-----------|-------| | Final decision | 28 U.S.C. § 1291 | All claims, all parties disposed | | Interlocutory — injunctions | 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) | Granting/refusing/modifying injunctions | | Interlocutory — certified | 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) | Controlling question of law, certified by district court | | Collateral order | Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949) | Conclusive, important question, effectively unreviewable | | Partial final judgment | FRCP 54(b) | Express determination of no just reason for delay | | Mandamus | 28 U.S.C. § 1651 | All Writs Act, extraordinary circumstances |
For state appeals, cite the specific state statute, constitutional provision, or court rule.
Then explain why the order falls within the cited grant. For final judgments, address finality. For interlocutory appeals, demonstrate the applicable exception with authority.
Build a chronological timeline:
[DATE] — Judgment/order entered (Dkt. No. ___)
[DATE] — Post-trial motion filed under FRCP ___ (if applicable)
[DATE] — Post-trial motion decided (if applicable)
[DATE] — Notice of appeal filed (Dkt. No. ___)
[DATE] — Filing deadline
Federal deadlines (FRAP Rule 4):
| Scenario | Deadline | |----------|----------| | Standard civil | 30 days from judgment entry | | U.S. government party | 60 days from judgment entry | | FRCP 50(b)/52(b)/59 motion pending | 30/60 days from disposition of last such motion | | Criminal | 14 days from judgment entry | | Cross-appeal | 14 days after first notice or within original deadline (whichever later) |
For state appeals, cite the exact rule and compute the deadline.
Address tolling from post-trial motions with rule citations. If notice was premature, cite FRAP 4(a)(2) (ripens upon entry) or FirsTier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage Ins. Co., 498 U.S. 269 (1991) [VERIFY].
Address if applicable:
Every factual assertion must cite to the appellate record per the court's format — federal: (R. at ___) or (App. ___); state: per local requirements.
tools
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
development
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
data-ai
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
testing
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.