skills/legal/jurisdictional-statement/SKILL.md
Drafts jurisdictional statements for U.S. appellate courts establishing authority to hear an appeal, procedural compliance, and timeliness. Covers 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291/1292, FRAP Rule 4, state appellate rules, finality analysis, interlocutory exceptions, tolling, and cross-appeals. Use when preparing appellate filings, jurisdictional briefs, or responding to jurisdictional challenges.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills jurisdictional-statementInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Drafts a jurisdictional statement establishing appellate authority and procedural compliance to prevent dismissal for want of jurisdiction.
Gather before drafting:
Format per the appellate court's local rules. Include: full court name, all parties with appellate designations, both trial and appellate case numbers, and document title per court rules.
Identify the applicable grant of appellate jurisdiction:
| Basis | Authority | Scope | |-------|-----------|-------| | Final decision | 28 U.S.C. § 1291 | All claims, all parties disposed | | Interlocutory — injunctions | 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) | Granting/refusing/modifying injunctions | | Interlocutory — certified | 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) | Controlling question of law, certified by district court | | Collateral order | Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949) | Conclusive, important question, effectively unreviewable | | Partial final judgment | FRCP 54(b) | Express determination of no just reason for delay | | Mandamus | 28 U.S.C. § 1651 | All Writs Act, extraordinary circumstances |
For state appeals, cite the specific state statute, constitutional provision, or court rule.
Then explain why the order falls within the cited grant. For final judgments, address finality. For interlocutory appeals, demonstrate the applicable exception with authority.
Build a chronological timeline:
[DATE] — Judgment/order entered (Dkt. No. ___)
[DATE] — Post-trial motion filed under FRCP ___ (if applicable)
[DATE] — Post-trial motion decided (if applicable)
[DATE] — Notice of appeal filed (Dkt. No. ___)
[DATE] — Filing deadline
Federal deadlines (FRAP Rule 4):
| Scenario | Deadline | |----------|----------| | Standard civil | 30 days from judgment entry | | U.S. government party | 60 days from judgment entry | | FRCP 50(b)/52(b)/59 motion pending | 30/60 days from disposition of last such motion | | Criminal | 14 days from judgment entry | | Cross-appeal | 14 days after first notice or within original deadline (whichever later) |
For state appeals, cite the exact rule and compute the deadline.
Address tolling from post-trial motions with rule citations. If notice was premature, cite FRAP 4(a)(2) (ripens upon entry) or FirsTier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage Ins. Co., 498 U.S. 269 (1991) [VERIFY].
Address if applicable:
Every factual assertion must cite to the appellate record per the court's format — federal: (R. at ___) or (App. ___); state: per local requirements.
development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.