casemark/judgment-summary
skills/legal/judgment-summary/SKILL.md
Produces structured U.S. litigation judgment summaries from court opinions or final orders. Use when summarizing a judgment, opinion, final decision, post-trial ruling, appeal outcome, or case disposition brief. Covers caption, procedural history, facts, issues, standards of review, holdings, precedent treatment, concurrences/dissents, disposition, and practical implications with pinpoint citations.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills judgment-summaryInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Aug 8, 2026, 4:40 AM136.6s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- judgment-summary
- language:
- en
- description:
- Produces structured U.S. litigation judgment summaries from court opinions or final orders. Use when summarizing a judgment, opinion, final decision, post-trial ruling, appeal outcome, or case disposition brief. Covers caption, procedural history, facts, issues, standards of review, holdings, precedent treatment, concurrences/dissents, disposition, and practical implications with pinpoint citations.
Judgment Summary
Citation-ready summary of a final judgment or opinion — holdings, standards of review, precedent treatment, and practical impact.
Prerequisites
- Full opinion or judgment text with page/paragraph numbering.
- Case citation details: court, docket number, decision date, judge/panel.
- Procedural posture and any relevant lower court rulings.
Quick Start
- Extract case metadata; confirm jurisdiction.
- Identify issues, standards of review, and holdings with pinpoint cites.
- Separate background, material, and disputed facts.
- Track precedent treatment and circuit-split implications.
- Capture disposition, remand instructions, and deadlines.
- Translate holdings into practical implications — no advocacy.
Fill every section below. If a field is missing, write Not stated.
Template
CASE CAPTION
- Case name:
- Court:
- Docket no.:
- Decision date:
- Judge/Panel:
- Jurisdiction:
- Prior history:
SYNOPSIS (<=150 words)
- Core holding:
- Practical significance:
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
- Lower court decisions:
- Basis for appeal/review:
- Standard(s) of review:
- Scope of review:
FACTS
- Background facts:
- Material facts:
- Disputed facts:
ISSUES AND HOLDINGS
| Issue | Legal Standard | Rule/Reasoning | Holding | Pin Cite |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
PRECEDENT TREATMENT
| Case | Treatment (Followed/Distinguished/Overruled/Questioned) | Point of Use | Pin Cite |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
- Circuit split or split resolution: Yes/No + brief note
CONCURRENCE / DISSENT
- Author(s):
- Key departures:
- Implications:
DISPOSITION
- Result (affirmed/reversed/vacated/remanded):
- Remand instructions:
- Costs/fees:
- Deadlines or conditions:
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
- Litigation impact:
- Transactional/compliance impact:
- Evidence/procedure impact:
- Risk posture or strategy notes:
KEY CITATIONS
- Holdings:
- Critical facts:
- Notable reasoning:
Target length: 1,500–3,000 words unless the decision is unusually short.
Pitfalls
- Holdings vs. dicta: Distinguish explicitly; never elevate dicta to holding status.
- Neutral tone: No advocacy or editorial framing.
- Court terminology: Preserve the court's exact language for standards and tests.
- Uncertain citations: Mark with
[VERIFY]. - No inference: Do not infer facts or procedural steps absent from the opinion.
- Non-U.S. courts: Note deviations from U.S. practice in the Synopsis.
- Pinpoint cites required: Every holding and every court-labeled material fact needs one.
Key changes made:
- Frontmatter: Removed
tags(not in spec), tighteneddescriptionto be third-person with clear trigger keywords while staying under 1024 chars. - Overview: Condensed to a single line with em-dash for scannability.
- Prerequisites: Dropped item 4 (redundant with the template's procedural history section), tightened wording.
- Renamed "Output Structure / Process" → "Quick Start": Aligns with best-practice section naming; same 6 steps, punchier phrasing.
- Renamed section to "Template": Clearer label; template content unchanged since it's the core value of the skill.
- Renamed "Guidelines" → "Pitfalls": Reformatted as bold-label list items for faster scanning; same 7 rules, zero content loss.
- Removed redundant prose: Eliminated the bridging sentence before the template ("Use the following template…") and folded its instruction ("If a field is missing, write
Not stated") into Quick Start.
Related Skills
casemark/medical-records-gap-analysis
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Sep 3, 2026
casemark/private-placement-memo
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/privacy-law-updates
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/prior-art-summary
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026