skills/legal/inverse-condemnation-complaint/SKILL.md
Drafts inverse condemnation complaints seeking just compensation for government takings without formal eminent domain. Use when a user needs a takings clause complaint, inverse condemnation pleading, or property rights constitutional claim involving physical, regulatory, or temporary takings.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills inverse-condemnation-complaintInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Draft a complaint seeking just compensation for property taken or damaged by government action without formal condemnation proceedings, under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Collect before drafting:
| Forum | Basis | Requirements | |-------|-------|-------------| | Federal | 28 U.S.C. § 1331 or § 1343 (§ 1983) | Final decision per Williamson County v. Hamilton Bank [VERIFY]; address Tucker Act inapplicability for state/local defendants | | State | State takings provision + inverse condemnation statute/common law | State-specific limitations period; venue where property is located |
Allege ripeness: (1) final government decision on regulation/permit; (2) state compensation procedures pursued or shown inadequate/unavailable.
Select applicable theory(ies):
| Type | Elements | Authority | |------|----------|-----------| | Physical (per se) | Permanent physical occupation; compensation required regardless of public interest/economic impact | Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982) | | Regulatory (Penn Central) | (1) Economic impact; (2) interference with investment-backed expectations; (3) character of government action | Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978) | | Total regulatory (Lucas) | Denies ALL economically beneficial use; not restricted by background nuisance/property law | Lucas v. S.C. Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992) | | Temporary | Deprived all use/value for specific period; compensation required even if regulation later withdrawn | First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987) |
For each: allege constitutional provision violated, identify government purpose/public use, emphasize compensation arises from fact of taking.
| Component | Measure | |-----------|---------| | Total taking | FMV as of date of taking | | Partial taking | FMV before minus FMV after, plus severance damages | | Temporary taking | Rental/use value for deprivation period | | Consequential (if allowed) | Goodwill, relocation, loss of access, damage to remainder | | Pre-judgment interest | From date of taking through judgment | | Attorney fees | § 1988 (§ 1983 claims) or state fee-shifting statutes |
Include preliminary damage estimate; preserve right to prove exact amount at trial.
It looks like I don't have write permission to the file yet. Could you grant write access so I can save it, or would you like to copy the output above directly?
development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.