skills/legal/intrastate-offering/SKILL.md
Produces a compliance memo and execution plan for U.S. intrastate securities offerings under Rule 147 or Rule 147A with state registration by qualification. Covers safe harbor selection, doing-business tests, residency verification, advertising controls, resale restrictions, integration analysis, and blue sky registration. Trigger when the user mentions intrastate offering, Rule 147, Rule 147A, registration by qualification, single-state offering, Section 3(a)(11), state-only fundraising, in-state investor requirements, resale restriction legends, or says "we're only raising in one state."
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills intrastate-offeringInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
One out-of-state sale destroys the exemption — potentially retroactively for all investors. Unlike Rule 506, no NSMIA preemption exists; the issuer must also satisfy full state registration. This skill prevents the common failures: inadequate residency verification, uncontrolled advertising reach, failed doing-business tests, and integration with concurrent offerings.
Gather before drafting unless the user says "use defaults" or "just draft":
Defaults if no response: Rule 147A; registration by qualification; standard residency documentation. Label all defaults.
| Factor | Rule 147 [VERIFY] | Rule 147A [VERIFY] | Decision | |---|---|---|---| | Issuer formation | Must be in offering state | Out-of-state OK | Formed elsewhere → 147A | | Principal place of business | Required | Required | Document "nerve center" | | General solicitation | Restricted | Permitted with legends | Broad internet → 147A | | Offers to out-of-state | Risky | OK if sales in-state only | Confirm offer definition |
Verify current text: 17 CFR 230.147, 230.147A, 230.152; Securities Act §§ 3(a)(11), 5, 17(a) [VERIFY].
All four must be met. Document evidence for each:
| Test [VERIFY] | Threshold | Evidence | |---|---|---| | Revenue | ≥ 80% in-state | Revenue by customer/location | | Assets | ≥ 80% in-state | Balance sheet, fixed asset register | | Proceeds | ≥ 80% used in-state | Use-of-proceeds budget and tracking | | Employees | Majority in-state | Payroll and headcount by state |
| Investor Type | Standard [VERIFY] | Minimum Documents | |---|---|---| | Individual | Principal residence in state | Driver license + utility bill or tax record | | Entity | Principal place of business in state | Operating agreement + business address proof | | Entity formed for offering | Look-through to owners | Residency docs for all beneficial owners |
Legend template:
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. FOR A PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF SALE BY THE ISSUER, ANY RESALE MUST BE MADE ONLY TO PERSONS RESIDENT WITHIN THE STATE OF [STATE]. ANY TRANSFER IN VIOLATION OF THIS RESTRICTION IS VOID.
Subscription representation template:
Subscriber represents that Subscriber's principal residence (or principal place of business) is in the State of [STATE], and agrees to provide documentation reasonably requested to confirm residency. Subscriber acknowledges the securities are restricted and may not be transferred to non-residents during the applicable restricted period.
Integration analysis:
| Item | Risk | Mitigation | |---|---|---| | Recent offerings | Integration with intrastate | Rule 152 framework and spacing [VERIFY] | | Concurrent offerings | Confusing investor pools | Separate materials and investor lists | | General solicitation elsewhere | Contaminates intrastate | Pause or segregate campaigns |
State registration by qualification:
Every output must begin with:
Contingencies: Reject non-resident subscriptions and document; if residency error discovered, consult counsel immediately; if controls are unenforceable, recommend alternative exemptions.
After delivering, ask:
Quality gate — verify before finalizing:
Rules:
[VERIFY]development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.