casemark/interview-summary
skills/legal/interview-summary/SKILL.md
Generates structured summaries of witness or subject interviews for criminal defense investigations. Distills key facts, verbatim statements, credibility indicators, and follow-up leads. Use when summarizing defense interviews, witness debriefs, subject interrogations, or investigative interview notes.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills interview-summaryInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 4, 2026, 3:44 AM8.3s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- interview-summary
- description:
- Generates structured summaries of witness or subject interviews for criminal defense investigations. Distills key facts, verbatim statements, credibility indicators, and follow-up leads. Use when summarizing defense interviews, witness debriefs, subject interrogations, or investigative interview notes.
Interview Summary
Produces a structured memorandum distilling a witness or subject interview into actionable intelligence for defense teams and investigators.
Prerequisites
- Interview materials — transcript, audio transcription, investigator notes, or preliminary report
- Matter reference — case name/number and investigation context
- Related evidence — prior witness statements, documents shown during interview, or known inconsistencies
Quick Start
Collect interview materials, then generate each section below in order. Mark the document ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT — PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.
Output Sections
1. Header Block
| Field | Content |
|-------|---------|
| Date/Time | Interview date, start/end time |
| Location | Interview site |
| Interviewee | Name, role, relationship to matter |
| Interviewer(s) | Names, titles |
| Counsel Present | Defense counsel, interviewee's counsel if any |
| Observers | Anyone else present |
| Matter Reference | Case name/number |
| Privilege Marking | ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT — PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL |
2. Executive Summary
3–5 sentences covering:
- Most significant factual revelations
- Key admissions or denials
- Overall credibility assessment
- Impact on defense theory
3. Substantive Summary
Organize thematically, not chronologically:
- Background & Relationship — connection to events, relevant history
- Key Events — who, what, when, where, why, how per incident
- Knowledge of Other Parties — interactions with co-defendants, witnesses, complainants
- Documents & Communications — documents shown, recognized, referenced; reactions to exhibits
Per theme:
- [ ] Lead with concise factual summary
- [ ] Embed verbatim quotes for significant statements (quotation marks + context)
- [ ] Note gaps where interviewee lacked knowledge or memory
4. Credibility & Demeanor
| Indicator | Observation | |-----------|-------------| | Consistency | Internal contradictions within interview | | External conflicts | Contradictions with other evidence or witnesses | | Demeanor | Evasiveness, reluctance, confidence on specific topics | | Motive/Bias | Relationship factors affecting reliability | | Corroboration | Statements supported by independent evidence |
5. Exculpatory / Inculpatory Assessment
| Category | Statement/Fact | Significance | |----------|---------------|--------------| | Exculpatory | ... | ... | | Inculpatory | ... | ... | | Ambiguous | ... | ... |
6. Follow-Up & Recommendations
- [ ] Additional witnesses identified (name, contact, expected knowledge)
- [ ] Documents to obtain
- [ ] Topics requiring re-interview or clarification
- [ ] Investigative leads generated
- [ ] Areas needing corroboration
Pitfalls & Checks
- Objectivity — Distinguish interviewee statements, interviewer observations, and analytical assessments. Label each.
- Discoverability — Assume the summary may be disclosed. No speculation, no strategy, no mental impressions beyond factual observations.
- Privilege — Mark header with work-product designation. Do not embed legal strategy.
- Precision — Use exact names, dates, amounts. Flag approximations with
[approx.]. - Verbatim quotes — Use for admissions, denials, key characterizations, and potential impeachment material. Include surrounding context.
- Neutral tone — Factual language only. Label legal conclusions as analysis.
Related Skills
casemark/skills/legal/automated-contract-summary
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 26, 2026
casemark/obligation-mapping
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026
casemark/horizon-scanning
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026
casemark/gap-analysis
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026