casemark/interview-summary
skills/legal/interview-summary/SKILL.md
Generates structured summaries of witness or subject interviews for criminal defense investigations. Distills key facts, verbatim statements, credibility indicators, and follow-up leads. Use when summarizing defense interviews, witness debriefs, subject interrogations, or investigative interview notes.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills interview-summaryInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Aug 8, 2026, 4:36 AM160.8s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- interview-summary
- language:
- en
- description:
- Generates structured summaries of witness or subject interviews for criminal defense investigations. Distills key facts, verbatim statements, credibility indicators, and follow-up leads. Use when summarizing defense interviews, witness debriefs, subject interrogations, or investigative interview notes.
Interview Summary
Produces a structured memorandum distilling a witness or subject interview into actionable intelligence for defense teams and investigators.
Prerequisites
- Interview materials — transcript, audio transcription, investigator notes, or preliminary report
- Matter reference — case name/number and investigation context
- Related evidence — prior witness statements, documents shown during interview, or known inconsistencies
Quick Start
Collect interview materials, then generate each section below in order. Mark the document ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT — PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.
Output Sections
1. Header Block
| Field | Content |
|-------|---------|
| Date/Time | Interview date, start/end time |
| Location | Interview site |
| Interviewee | Name, role, relationship to matter |
| Interviewer(s) | Names, titles |
| Counsel Present | Defense counsel, interviewee's counsel if any |
| Observers | Anyone else present |
| Matter Reference | Case name/number |
| Privilege Marking | ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT — PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL |
2. Executive Summary
3–5 sentences covering:
- Most significant factual revelations
- Key admissions or denials
- Overall credibility assessment
- Impact on defense theory
3. Substantive Summary
Organize thematically, not chronologically:
- Background & Relationship — connection to events, relevant history
- Key Events — who, what, when, where, why, how per incident
- Knowledge of Other Parties — interactions with co-defendants, witnesses, complainants
- Documents & Communications — documents shown, recognized, referenced; reactions to exhibits
Per theme:
- [ ] Lead with concise factual summary
- [ ] Embed verbatim quotes for significant statements (quotation marks + context)
- [ ] Note gaps where interviewee lacked knowledge or memory
4. Credibility & Demeanor
| Indicator | Observation | |-----------|-------------| | Consistency | Internal contradictions within interview | | External conflicts | Contradictions with other evidence or witnesses | | Demeanor | Evasiveness, reluctance, confidence on specific topics | | Motive/Bias | Relationship factors affecting reliability | | Corroboration | Statements supported by independent evidence |
5. Exculpatory / Inculpatory Assessment
| Category | Statement/Fact | Significance | |----------|---------------|--------------| | Exculpatory | ... | ... | | Inculpatory | ... | ... | | Ambiguous | ... | ... |
6. Follow-Up & Recommendations
- [ ] Additional witnesses identified (name, contact, expected knowledge)
- [ ] Documents to obtain
- [ ] Topics requiring re-interview or clarification
- [ ] Investigative leads generated
- [ ] Areas needing corroboration
Pitfalls & Checks
- Objectivity — Distinguish interviewee statements, interviewer observations, and analytical assessments. Label each.
- Discoverability — Assume the summary may be disclosed. No speculation, no strategy, no mental impressions beyond factual observations.
- Privilege — Mark header with work-product designation. Do not embed legal strategy.
- Precision — Use exact names, dates, amounts. Flag approximations with
[approx.]. - Verbatim quotes — Use for admissions, denials, key characterizations, and potential impeachment material. Include surrounding context.
- Neutral tone — Factual language only. Label legal conclusions as analysis.
Related Skills
casemark/medical-records-gap-analysis
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Sep 3, 2026
casemark/private-placement-memo
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/privacy-law-updates
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/prior-art-summary
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026