skills/legal/interest-calculation-reference/SKILL.md
Calculates and validates pre-petition interest for U.S. bankruptcy creditor proofs of claim. Triggers on "proof of claim", "pre-petition interest", "bankruptcy claim", "interest worksheet", "claim amount", or when drafting, auditing, or objecting to claim filings.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills interest-calculation-referenceInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Workflow for pre-petition interest calculations and charge inclusion decisions on creditor proofs of claim.
Gather before starting:
| Field | Capture | |---|---| | Principal Balance | Outstanding principal as of last payment or cutoff | | Last Payment/Accrual Date | Date of last payment or latest principal application | | Petition Date | Filing date | | Annual Rate | Decimal or percentage | | Rate Source | Contract / Judgment / State statutory / Federal | | Day-Count Basis | 365, 360, or 30/360 | | Claim Type | Unsecured, Secured, Priority | | Charges Included | Late fees, NSF fees, attorney fees, other |
Pre-petition Interest = Principal × Rate × (Accrual Days ÷ Day-Count-Basis)Per Diem = (Principal × Rate) ÷ Day-Count-BasisTotal Claim = Principal + Pre-petition Interest + Allowed Other Charges| Priority | Source | Rule | |---|---|---| | 1 | Contract | Exact contractual rate and methodology | | 2 | Judgment | Judgment rate for pre-petition judgment claims | | 3 | State statutory | Applicable state prejudgment rate if no higher source | | 4 | Federal §1961 | Only when judgment-rate path designates it as fallback |
| Claim Type | Rule | |---|---| | Unsecured | No post-petition interest — stop at petition date. Solvent-debtor exception only if affirmatively supported [VERIFY] | | Secured | Only if oversecured under §506(b); limited by equity cushion | | Priority | Usually none — confirm statutory priority language |
Each charge must be: (1) contract- or statute-authorized, (2) accrued/assessed pre-petition, and (3) documented.
BANKRUPTCY INTEREST CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Debtor: ____________ Case No.: ____________
Creditor: ____________ Account No.: __________
1) Principal
Original principal: $ ________
Payments to cutoff: -$ ________
Principal as of [Accrual Date]: $ ________
2) Interest
Annual rate: ________%
Rate source: [ ] Contract [ ] Judgment [ ] State [ ] Federal
Day-count: [ ] Actual/365 [ ] Actual/360 [ ] 30/360
Accrual period: [From] __ / [To] __ / Days ____
Per diem: $ ________
Pre-petition interest: $ ________
3) Other Charges (only if supported)
Late fees: $ ________
NSF/other fees: $ ________
Attorney fees (pre-petition): $ ________
Other allowed charges: $ ________
Charges total: $ ________
4) Claim Summary
Principal: $ ________
Pre-petition interest: $ ________
Other charges: $ ________
TOTAL CLAIM AT PETITION: $ ________
Documentation: [ ] Rate clause [ ] Payment ledger
[ ] Day-count rationale [ ] Charge authorization [ ] Signature/date
Run before filing:
| Error | Fix | |---|---| | Wrong principal baseline | Reconcile to balance after last credited payment | | Wrong day-count basis | Use contract or documented basis | | Wrong compounding method | Match contract; default to simple interest | | Unauthorized fees included | Remove; note authority required | | Missing rate source | Document statute, contract clause, or judgment paragraph | | Interest calculated past petition date | Cap unsecured/general claims at petition date |
@bankruptcy-proof-of-claim@bankruptcy-collateral-valuation-reference@bankruptcy-objection-to-proof-of-claim@commercial-loan-analysisKey changes made:
Interest formula (kept only the pre-petition variant), collapsed the three-column post-petition table to two columns, condensed the Guidelines section into a focused Pitfalls listdevelopment
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.