casemark/heritage-protection-summary
skills/legal/heritage-protection-summary/SKILL.md
Generates structured legal briefings on cultural heritage protection developments. Synthesizes judicial decisions, legislation, treaty updates, and regulatory changes across repatriation, trafficking, armed conflict, underwater heritage, intangible cultural heritage, and indigenous rights. Trigger when producing periodic briefings, policy digests, or thematic research for governments, NGOs, cultural institutions, or international organizations working in cultural property law.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills heritage-protection-summaryInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 4, 2026, 3:38 AM14.6s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- heritage-protection-summary
- description:
- Generates structured legal briefings on cultural heritage protection developments. Synthesizes judicial decisions, legislation, treaty updates, and regulatory changes across repatriation, trafficking, armed conflict, underwater heritage, intangible cultural heritage, and indigenous rights. Trigger when producing periodic briefings, policy digests, or thematic research for governments, NGOs, cultural institutions, or international organizations working in cultural property law.
Cultural Heritage Protection Legal Summary
Produces structured briefings on cultural heritage law developments for institutional stakeholders.
Quick Start
- Define scope — jurisdiction(s), date range, thematic focus (repatriation, trafficking, armed conflict, etc.)
- Identify audience — legal advisors, policy makers, enforcement officials, or repatriation advocates
- Gather sources — case decisions, legislative texts, treaty updates; conduct independent research if none provided
Workflow
Step 1: Executive Overview
Open with a ½–1 page summary:
- 3–5 most significant developments in the period
- Jurisdictional snapshot (international / regional / national)
- Emerging conflicts or trends requiring immediate attention
Step 2: Thematic Sections
Include only sections with material developments:
| Section | Scope | |---|---| | Repatriation & Restitution | Artifact return decisions; provenance disputes; good-faith purchaser conflicts | | Armed Conflict & Emergency | 1954 Hague Convention enforcement; UNSC resolutions; destruction as war crime | | Illicit Trafficking | Prosecutions; customs seizures; import/export controls; market-state vs. source-state | | Underwater Heritage | 2001 UNESCO Convention; salvage law conflicts; maritime jurisdiction | | Intangible Cultural Heritage | 2003 UNESCO Convention; traditional knowledge; IP interface | | Indigenous Cultural Rights | UNDRIP applications; NAGPRA enforcement [VERIFY recent amendments]; patrimony claims | | Legislative & Regulatory | New statutes, amendments, administrative regulations |
Step 3: Case Entries
Per decision, use this structure:
- Case — style of cause
- Court/Tribunal — name, date, jurisdiction
- Heritage at Issue — artifact / site / intangible property
- Legal Framework — UNESCO 1970 / Hague 1954 / UNIDROIT 1995 / national law
- Key Question — central legal issue
- Holding — court's determination
- Practical Significance — impact on practice or policy
- Cross-Jurisdictional Note — if decision may influence other systems
Step 4: Trends & Recommendations
- Pattern analysis across developments
- Anticipated litigation or legislation
- Actionable recommendations for stakeholders
Pitfalls & Checks
- Flag uncertain citations with
[VERIFY]— exclude decisions lacking confirmed dates or courts - Do not conflate frameworks — each has a distinct scope:
- 1970 UNESCO → illicit trade
- 1954 Hague → armed conflict
- UNIDROIT 1995 → private law restitution
- 2001 UNESCO → underwater heritage
- Distinguish hard law from soft law — mark resolutions, guidelines, and model laws vs. binding instruments
- Flag CIL formation — note decisions or state practice contributing to emerging customary international law
- Non-trafficking destruction — capture heritage loss from development, extractive industry, or climate events
- Target length — 3–7 pages; executive overview always leads
Related Skills
casemark/skills/legal/automated-contract-summary
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 26, 2026
casemark/obligation-mapping
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026
casemark/horizon-scanning
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026
casemark/gap-analysis
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026