skills/legal/grant-agreement/SKILL.md
Drafts U.S. grant agreements for philanthropic fund transfers between grantors and nonprofit grantees. Enforces IRC § 4945 expenditure responsibility, 501(c)(3) compliance, permitted-use restrictions, milestone disbursements, reporting obligations, and clawback rights. Use when drafting grant award letters, corporate giving agreements, nonprofit funding agreements, or foundation grant contracts.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills grant-agreementInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Drafts enforceable U.S. grant agreements transferring funds with conditions, protecting grantor oversight while giving grantees clear operational parameters.
Gather before drafting:
Grantor block: Legal name, formation state, address, EIN, entity type, authorized representative + title + authority source.
Grantee block: Legal name, DBA, jurisdiction, EIN, tax status (cite determination letter date), address. Fiscal sponsor → identify all three parties with explicit obligations. Foreign org → note equivalency or expenditure responsibility election.
Recitals: Establish: (a) grantor's exempt purpose or CSR rationale; (b) grantee qualifications; (c) selection process; (d) relationship is a grant — not loan, contract, JV, or service exchange; (e) legal authority (board approval, payout compliance).
| Element | Terms | |---|---| | Total amount | Numerals and words; specify currency | | Disbursement | Lump sum / installments / milestone tranches | | Conditions per payment | Reports approved, deliverables met, compliance confirmed, matching funds evidenced | | Budget modification | ≤10% line-item variance: grantee discretion; >10% or category change: prior written approval | | Unexpended funds | Return within [30] days of term end or carry-forward with written approval |
Permitted:
Prohibited:
Pre-disbursement checklist:
Ongoing covenants:
| Report | Frequency | Due | Content | |---|---|---|---| | Financial | Quarterly/semi-annual | [X] days post-period | Expenditures by category, cumulative totals, variance narrative (>10%), compliance certification | | Programmatic | Same | Same | Activities, progress vs. objectives, challenges, outcomes, plan modifications | | Final | Once | [30–90] days post-term | Full reconciliation, outcomes vs. objectives, lessons learned, sustainability plan, IP inventory | | Audit | Annual (if required) | [120–180] days post-FY | CPA audit per GAAS; triggered if grant > [$50k–$100k] or org revenue > [$750k] |
Monitoring rights: Site visits ([X] days' notice; no notice if fraud suspected), on-demand book/record inspection, payment suspension for reporting delinquency.
For cause ([15–30]-day cure unless incurable):
| Incurable (immediate) | Curable (with cure period) | |---|---| | Fraud or intentional fund misuse | Reporting delinquency | | Criminal conviction of key personnel | Insurance lapse | | Loss of 501(c)(3) or required status | Budget overrun without approval | | Bankruptcy or dissolution | Key personnel departure without notice | | OFAC/sanctions violation | Minor scope deviation |
Automatic triggers: Bankruptcy, dissolution, loss of exempt status, prohibited change of control.
For convenience: [30]-day written notice; grantee retains properly expended funds.
Post-termination: Return unexpended funds within [30] days + final accounting. For-cause → grantor may demand return of all funds. Surviving provisions: record retention, audit cooperation, confidentiality, IP, indemnification.
Grant-funded assets: Specify disposition — return to grantor / transfer to designated nonprofit / grantee retains for charitable use.
| Provision | Terms | |---|---| | Governing law | [Grantor's state]; no conflict-of-laws | | Venue | [County/District], [State] — exclusive | | Disputes | Negotiation [30 days] → Mediation (shared cost) → Litigation or AAA Arbitration | | Indemnification | Grantee indemnifies grantor for third-party claims from grantee's acts/omissions | | Assignment | Grantee: prohibited without consent. Grantor: may assign to successor | | Relationship | Independent parties; no partnership, JV, agency, or employment | | Amendment | Written, signed by both parties | | Integration | Entire agreement; supersedes prior negotiations | | Severability / Waiver | Standard; waiver must be written | | Counterparts / Notices | E-signatures valid; certified mail / courier / confirmed email |
Each party: entity name, signatory name, title, execution date, authority reference.
tools
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
development
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
data-ai
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
testing
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.