casemark/expert-medical-record-omissions
skills/legal/expert-medical-record-omissions/SKILL.md
Analyzes expert witness reports, depositions, and testimony to identify gaps in medical record review, map conflicts to the full record set, and produce impeachment and admissibility analysis with pinpoint citations. Use when reviewing expert reports for missing medical records, selective review patterns, Daubert/Frye challenges, cross-examination prep, motions to exclude or limit, or rebuttal expert focus in personal injury or medical malpractice litigation.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills expert-medical-record-omissionsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 25, 2026, 9:42 PM2.0s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- expert-medical-record-omissions
- description:
- Analyzes expert witness reports, depositions, and testimony to identify gaps in medical record review, map conflicts to the full record set, and produce impeachment and admissibility analysis with pinpoint citations. Use when reviewing expert reports for missing medical records, selective review patterns, Daubert/Frye challenges, cross-examination prep, motions to exclude or limit, or rebuttal expert focus in personal injury or medical malpractice litigation.
Expert Medical Record Omissions
Identify material omissions in expert medical record review and translate them into litigation-ready challenges with pinpoint citations.
Prerequisites
- Complete medical record set with Bates labels and index
- Expert materials: report(s), disclosure, materials-reviewed list, CV, deposition/testimony transcripts, exhibits
- Case theory summary (claims, defenses, causation or standard-of-care theory)
- Jurisdiction admissibility standard (Daubert, Frye, or hybrid)
- Medical chronology or timeline (if available)
Workflow
- Build record inventory and expert review map
- Detect omissions and contradictions
- Rate materiality and litigation impact
- Flag patterns suggesting selective review or bias
- Deliver structured report with pinpoint citations
Record Inventory
For each medical record, capture:
| Field | Entry | |---|---| | Record date | Encounter or service date | | Provider/facility | Name and specialty | | Record type | Note, imaging, lab, operative, billing, etc. | | Bates range | Start–end | | Key facts | Diagnosis, findings, causation cues | | Causation relevance | Supports / Contradicts / Alternative / Neutral |
Expert Review Map
Extract from the expert's own materials:
| Item | Source | Citation | |---|---|---| | Materials-reviewed list | Report or disclosure | Page/paragraph | | Records cited in opinions | Report | Page/paragraph | | Deposition admissions about records | Transcript | Page/line | | Stated limitations or exclusions | Report or deposition | Page/line |
Omission Matrix
One row per omitted record:
| Omitted record | Date | Provider | Bates | Expert statement that should have addressed it | Conflict or gap | Significance | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Record name | Date | Provider | Bates | Report/Depo cite | Contradiction / Alternative / Context | High / Med / Low |
Significance scale:
- High — Directly undermines key opinion or reliability. Use for admissibility challenges, motion practice.
- Medium — Alters weight but not core opinion. Use for cross-examination, rebuttal focus.
- Low — Peripheral or cumulative. Use for background impeachment.
Inconsistency Log
| Expert assertion | Claimed source | Contradicting record | Citation (Bates + page/line) | Impact | |---|---|---|---|---| | Assertion | Cite | Record | Bates + page/line | Material / Moderate / Minor |
Pattern Flags
Check for these indicators of selective review or bias:
- [ ] Repeated omission of pre-existing conditions
- [ ] Omission of alternative causation records
- [ ] Omission of treating provider notes conflicting with opinion
- [ ] Omission of diagnostic imaging or labs central to timeline
- [ ] Chronology inconsistencies versus record dates
- [ ] Mischaracterization of records listed as reviewed
- [ ] Selective inclusion of favorable records only
Strategic Outputs
Cross-Examination Seeds
| Theme | Anchor omission | Objective | |---|---|---| | Record completeness | Record | Establish incomplete review | | Methodology | Omitted category | Show unreliable process | | Alternative causation | Record | Expose unaddressed cause | | Timeline accuracy | Record | Undermine chronology |
Motion Triggers
Flag for Daubert/Frye challenge or motion to exclude when:
- Expert failed to consider key facts relevant to causation or standard of care
- Methodology not reliably applied to the full record set
- Opinions based on inaccurate timeline or mischaracterized records
- Expert did not review materials they claim to have reviewed
Report Structure
Organize final output as:
- Scope and Materials — Record set scope, expert materials reviewed, admissibility standard
- Omission Summary — Count and list by significance (High / Medium / Low)
- Omission Matrix — Full table
- Inconsistency Log — Full table
- Pattern Analysis — Indicators observed, alternative explanations for omissions
- Strategic Recommendations — Cross-examination themes, motion practice targets, rebuttal expert focus areas
Pitfalls
- Omission vs. disagreement: Only flag omissions where the record exists and was not addressed. Disagreement with a reviewed record is not an omission.
- Record completeness: Confirm the record set is complete before concluding a gap is material. Flag missing record categories that could change the analysis.
- Citation rigor: Every omission and contradiction requires a pinpoint citation (Bates + page/line).
- Weight vs. admissibility: Separate weight attacks from admissibility challenges. Note the jurisdiction's standard.
- Neutrality: Avoid advocacy language in the analysis itself.
- PHI: Protect PHI and comply with applicable confidentiality rules.
Related Skills
casemark/skills/legal/automated-contract-summary
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 26, 2026
casemark/obligation-mapping
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026
casemark/horizon-scanning
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026
casemark/gap-analysis
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026