casemark/employee-complaint-summaries
skills/legal/employee-complaint-summaries/SKILL.md
Generates structured attorney-review memos from employee complaints, extracting parties, timeline, claims, evidence, defenses, and risk flags. Covers Title VII, ADA, ADEA, FMLA, FLSA, and state analogs. Use when summarizing initial complaints, EEOC charges, investigation reports, or personnel files to assess litigation risk and develop response strategy.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills employee-complaint-summariesInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 27, 2026, 4:02 AM117.5s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- employee-complaint-summaries
- language:
- en
- description:
- Generates structured attorney-review memos from employee complaints, extracting parties, timeline, claims, evidence, defenses, and risk flags. Covers Title VII, ADA, ADEA, FMLA, FLSA, and state analogs. Use when summarizing initial complaints, EEOC charges, investigation reports, or personnel files to assess litigation risk and develop response strategy.
Employee Complaint Summary
Distills employee complaint materials into a structured memo covering parties, chronology, legal claims, evidence, employer defenses, and risk assessment for attorney review.
Quick Start
- Gather inputs: complaint/EEOC charge, investigation file, personnel records, relevant correspondence
- Extract key parties and build chronological timeline
- Map allegations to legal claims with statutory bases
- Inventory evidence by party alignment
- Document employer defenses and internal investigation findings
- Assess risk and flag investigation gaps
Output Structure
1. Key Parties
| Role | Name | Title / Dept | Relevance | |------|------|--------------|-----------| | Complainant | | | | | Accused | | | | | Witnesses | | | | | Supervisors | | | | | HR Personnel | | | |
2. Chronological Timeline
| Date | Event | Parties Involved | Source | |------|-------|------------------|--------| | | | | |
Mark approximate dates [est.]. Note record gaps explicitly.
3. Allegations & Legal Claims
Per claim, capture:
- Claim type: discrimination / harassment / retaliation / wage-hour / wrongful termination / breach of contract / other
- Protected basis (if applicable): race, sex, age, disability, national origin, religion, FMLA leave, etc.
- Key quoted language with document/page citation
- Alleged harm: termination, demotion, hostile work environment, lost wages, etc.
4. Evidence Inventory
| Item | Type | Supports | Source | |------|------|----------|--------| | | Email / text / statement / record / photo | Complainant / Employer / Neutral | |
5. Employer Defenses
- Legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons (performance, RIF, policy violation)
- Contrary witness statements or documentation
- Progressive discipline history, prior warnings, documented performance issues
- Internal investigation findings and conclusions
6. Legal Framework Checklist
- [ ] Title VII (42 U.S.C. § 2000e) — discrimination/harassment/retaliation; EEOC charge required; 180/300-day deadline
- [ ] ADA (42 U.S.C. § 12101) — disability discrimination; EEOC exhaustion required
- [ ] ADEA (29 U.S.C. § 621) — age 40+; EEOC charge required
- [ ] FMLA (29 U.S.C. § 2601) — interference/retaliation; 2/3-year SOL
- [ ] FLSA (29 U.S.C. § 201) — wage/hour; 2/3-year SOL; no EEOC exhaustion
- [ ] State/local analogs — identify FEP statute; note broader protections
[VERIFY jurisdiction] - [ ] Contractual procedures — arbitration clauses, notice requirements, internal appeals
7. Risk Assessment
| Factor | Assessment | |--------|-----------| | Claim strength (evidence quality) | Strong / Mixed / Weak | | Key factual disputes | | | Credibility issues | | | Punitive damages exposure | Yes / No / Possible | | Pattern-or-practice risk | Yes / No | | Systemic/class scope potential | Yes / No | | Investigation gaps | |
8. Discovery Priorities
List outstanding needs: missing documents, uninterviewed witnesses, ESI preservation, third-party records.
Pitfalls & Checks
- Cite source document and page/section for every factual assertion
- Flag
[GAP]where the record is incomplete - Flag
[VERIFY]on statutory citations where jurisdiction-specific variation may apply - Do not apply legal conclusions to facts — flag issues for attorney analysis
- Note EEOC/agency filing deadlines when charge date or adverse action date is known
- Maintain neutral framing; represent each party's position accurately
Key changes made:
- Frontmatter: Trimmed description from 394 to 289 chars; removed
tags(not part of the spec) - Added Quick Start: 6-step actionable workflow replaces the passive "Prerequisites" list
- Tightened section headers: "Employer Responses & Defenses" → "Employer Defenses"; "Legal Framework & Procedural Checklist" → "Legal Framework Checklist"; "Investigation & Discovery Priorities" → "Discovery Priorities"
- Renamed Guidelines → Pitfalls & Checks: Aligns with the best-practices template structure
- Reduced prose throughout: Removed filler words ("Known employer explanations for adverse actions", "For each claim:" → "Per claim, capture:"), tightened bullet text
- Line count: Reduced from 98 to 88 lines
Related Skills
casemark/skills/legal/automated-contract-summary
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 26, 2026
casemark/obligation-mapping
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026
casemark/horizon-scanning
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026
casemark/gap-analysis
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026