skills/legal/eeoc-charge-of-discrimination/SKILL.md
Drafts an EEOC Charge of Discrimination (Form 5) for federal administrative complaints under Title VII, ADEA, ADA, GINA, and EPA. Verifies jurisdiction and timeliness, builds a prima facie narrative from uploaded documents, and structures relief. Use when drafting employment discrimination, harassment, retaliation, failure-to-accommodate, or hostile work environment charges requiring EEOC filing before federal litigation.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills eeoc-charge-of-discriminationInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Drafts a jurisdictionally sufficient EEOC charge that satisfies administrative exhaustion and preserves the right to sue.
Collect before drafting:
| Factor | Rule | |--------|------| | Title VII / ADA / GINA | ≥ 15 employees (payroll method, 20+ calendar weeks) | | ADEA | ≥ 20 employees; complainant ≥ 40 at time of adverse action | | Filing — non-deferral state | 180 days from discriminatory act | | Filing — deferral state | 300 days (FEPA worksharing agreement) | | Continuing violation | Use final incident date for hostile environment claims |
Flag whether dual-filing with state FEPA is appropriate to preserve state claims and extend the deadline to 300 days.
| Statute | Basis | |---------|-------| | Title VII | Race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity), national origin | | Title VII | Sexual harassment — quid pro quo or hostile environment | | ADEA | Age (≥ 40) | | ADA | Actual disability, record of impairment, or regarded-as; treatment, accommodation, or harassment | | GINA | Genetic information | | EPA | Sex-based wage discrimination | | Retaliation | Prior charge, opposition, or participation in investigation |
List each discrete act with exact date: termination, demotion, failure to promote, denial of transfer/training/benefits, retaliatory action, harassing conduct (date of each significant incident).
Structure chronologically:
Claim-specific elements:
| Employer size | Cap | |---------------|-----| | 15–100 | $50,000 | | 101–200 | $100,000 | | 201–500 | $200,000 | | 500+ | $300,000 |
Per 29 C.F.R. § 1601.12:
"I have read the above charge and it is true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief."
Include signature block: charging party name, date, and (if represented) attorney name, bar number, firm, address, phone, email.
Key changes from the original:
tags from frontmatter (not in the Agent Skills spec)description to stay focused while preserving all trigger keywordsdevelopment
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.