casemark/digital-media-law-summary
skills/legal/digital-media-law-summary/SKILL.md
Generates Bluebook-cited summaries of digital media law across copyright/IP, privacy/data protection, and content liability pillars. Trigger when tracking digital media law developments, advising platforms or creators, preparing regulatory updates, or researching Section 230, DMCA, GDPR/CCPA, or online speech frameworks.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills digital-media-law-summaryInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 27, 2026, 3:52 AM135.8s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- digital-media-law-summary
- language:
- en
- description:
- >-
Digital Media Law Summary
Produces a citation-verified summary of current digital media law across three pillars — copyright/IP, privacy, and content liability — with practical compliance guidance for platforms, creators, and compliance teams.
Quick Start
- Confirm time window (default: 12–18 months)
- Confirm pillar focus — all three or a subset: copyright/IP, privacy, content liability
- Confirm jurisdiction (default: US + EU/UK developments with US compliance impact)
- Confirm audience — legal specialists, business/compliance, or mixed
Output Structure
1. Executive Overview
- Top 3–5 cross-pillar developments (2–3 sentences each)
- Dominant trends and directional signals
- Highest-risk compliance areas
2. Pillar A — Copyright & IP
| Topic | Key Issues | |---|---| | DMCA Safe Harbor | Platform eligibility, red-flag knowledge, takedown compliance | | Fair Use (Digital) | Transformativeness in AI training, scraping, remix culture | | AI-Generated Content | Authorship, training data liability, output ownership | | NFTs & Digital Ownership | Token ≠ copyright; smart contract enforceability | | Platform UGC Liability | Secondary infringement post–safe harbor loss |
3. Pillar B — Privacy & Data Protection
| Framework | Scope | Key Obligations | |---|---|---| | GDPR | EU + extraterritorial | Lawful basis, DPIAs, cross-border transfers | | CCPA/CPRA | California consumers | Opt-out rights, sensitive data, GPC compliance | | State Privacy Laws | VA, CO, CT, TX, OR, MT+ | Patchwork compliance; note effective dates | | Biometric Data | IL BIPA, TX, WA | Private right of action exposure |
4. Pillar C — Content Liability
| Topic | Key Issues | |---|---| | Section 230 | Immunity scope; editorial carve-outs; SCOTUS/congressional pressure | | Defamation Online | Public/private figure standards; distributor liability | | Algorithmic Amplification | Publisher vs. neutral conduit distinction | | Platform Moderation | State must-carry laws (NetChoice line); viewpoint claims |
5. Circuit Splits & Conflicts
| Issue | Courts in Conflict | Majority View | SCOTUS Cert Potential | |---|---|---|---| | Per issue | Circuits | View | High / Low / Pending |
6. International Dimensions
- EU/UK developments creating US compliance obligations
- Cross-border transfer status (SCCs, adequacy, enforcement)
7. Forward Look
- Cases percolating toward appellate review
- Pending legislation and regulatory proposals
- Stress points from generative AI, encrypted communications, blockchain
8. Practical Guidance
| Stakeholder | Priority Actions | |---|---| | Platforms | DMCA audit; Section 230 documentation; privacy control updates | | Creators | Licensing clarity; AI-output disclosure; biometric consent | | Compliance Teams | State privacy gap analysis; consent management; incident response |
Per-Development Citation Format
Each development entry must follow:
- Bluebook citation (full)
- Facts (2–3 sentences) → Issue → Holding
- Practical implication (platform / creator / compliance perspective)
Checks
- Bluebook format for all citations; mark uncertain citations
[VERIFY] - Distinguish binding precedent from persuasive authority; state jurisdictional scope
- Note whether agency guidance carries force of law vs. interpretive status
- Present circuit splits neutrally; identify majority or trending view
- Flag areas where law is actively unsettled or under appellate review
- Include international developments only where they create US compliance obligations or influence US doctrine
Related Skills
casemark/skills/legal/automated-contract-summary
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 26, 2026
casemark/obligation-mapping
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026
casemark/horizon-scanning
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026
casemark/gap-analysis
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026