skills/legal/deposition-summary-page-line/SKILL.md
Generates page-line deposition summaries from U.S. litigation transcripts with citation-anchored flagging for admissions, inconsistencies, objections, and exhibits. Trigger when summarizing depositions, preparing cross-examination outlines, identifying impeachment material, or building evidentiary records.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills deposition-summary-page-lineInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Transforms deposition transcripts into topically organized, citation-anchored summaries with strategic flags for admissions, inconsistencies, objections, and exhibits. Delivers PDF (searchable, bookmarked) and DOCX (annotatable) outputs. Supports post-delivery Q&A with citation-grounded responses.
Cite all testimony as Page X, Lines Y–Z throughout.
Required sections:
| Section | Content | |---------|---------| | Witness & Proceeding Header | Name, date, matter, counsel, court reporter | | Topical Testimony | Organized by legal issue, not chronologically | | Admissions | Statements establishing claim/defense elements | | Inconsistencies | Side-by-side cites where testimony shifted or conflicted | | Evasion / Hedging | Non-responsive, equivocal, or certainty-shifted answers | | Objections Log | Grounds, ruling/outcome, whether answer was given | | Exhibits Referenced | ID, description, introduction cite, follow-up flag | | Timeline Entries | Dates/events extracted; cross-referenced for inconsistency |
Flags:
[ADMISSION] — concedes claim/defense element[INCONSISTENT] — conflicts with earlier testimony (cite both)[CONFLICT-EXT] — conflicts with documents or other depositions[EVASIVE] — non-responsive or materially hedged[EXHIBIT] — document introduced or referenced[FOLLOW-UP] — gaps needing additional discoveryAfter delivering the summary, handle attorney queries with citation-supported analysis.
| Query Type | Handling |
|------------|----------|
| Factual | All relevant testimony with exact cites |
| Comparative | Side-by-side cites showing how testimony evolved |
| Evaluative | Surface testimony and ambiguities; no legal conclusions |
| Impeachment | Compile inconsistencies, hedging, [CONFLICT-EXT] flags |
Every response must include Page X, Lines Y–Z references. When testimony spans multiple locations, cite all and explain relationships.
[CONFLICT-EXT] flags against prior depositions when available.development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.