skills/legal/deposition-summary-page-line/SKILL.md
Generates page-line deposition summaries from U.S. litigation transcripts with citation-anchored flagging for admissions, inconsistencies, objections, and exhibits. Trigger when summarizing depositions, preparing cross-examination outlines, identifying impeachment material, or building evidentiary records.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills deposition-summary-page-lineInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Transforms deposition transcripts into topically organized, citation-anchored summaries with strategic flags for admissions, inconsistencies, objections, and exhibits. Delivers PDF (searchable, bookmarked) and DOCX (annotatable) outputs. Supports post-delivery Q&A with citation-grounded responses.
Cite all testimony as Page X, Lines Y–Z throughout.
Required sections:
| Section | Content | |---------|---------| | Witness & Proceeding Header | Name, date, matter, counsel, court reporter | | Topical Testimony | Organized by legal issue, not chronologically | | Admissions | Statements establishing claim/defense elements | | Inconsistencies | Side-by-side cites where testimony shifted or conflicted | | Evasion / Hedging | Non-responsive, equivocal, or certainty-shifted answers | | Objections Log | Grounds, ruling/outcome, whether answer was given | | Exhibits Referenced | ID, description, introduction cite, follow-up flag | | Timeline Entries | Dates/events extracted; cross-referenced for inconsistency |
Flags:
[ADMISSION] — concedes claim/defense element[INCONSISTENT] — conflicts with earlier testimony (cite both)[CONFLICT-EXT] — conflicts with documents or other depositions[EVASIVE] — non-responsive or materially hedged[EXHIBIT] — document introduced or referenced[FOLLOW-UP] — gaps needing additional discoveryAfter delivering the summary, handle attorney queries with citation-supported analysis.
| Query Type | Handling |
|------------|----------|
| Factual | All relevant testimony with exact cites |
| Comparative | Side-by-side cites showing how testimony evolved |
| Evaluative | Surface testimony and ambiguities; no legal conclusions |
| Impeachment | Compile inconsistencies, hedging, [CONFLICT-EXT] flags |
Every response must include Page X, Lines Y–Z references. When testimony spans multiple locations, cite all and explain relationships.
[CONFLICT-EXT] flags against prior depositions when available.tools
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
development
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
data-ai
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
testing
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.