skills/legal/deposition-analysis/SKILL.md
Produces litigation-grade U.S. deposition summaries with exact page-line citations, topical organization, and strategic analysis of admissions, inconsistencies, objections, and exhibits. Use when asked for deposition summaries, page-line or P&L citations, depo analysis, impeachment review, cross-exam prep, or motion-support summaries.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills deposition-analysisInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Generates citation-accurate, topic-organized deposition summaries with strategic analysis for discovery and trial preparation. Assumes U.S. deposition conventions unless another jurisdiction is specified.
All citations use: Page X, Lines Y-Z
Every substantive statement, objection, and exhibit reference must carry a cite. If uncertain about a cite, acknowledge uncertainty — never guess.
| Section | Content | |---|---| | Case Overview | Witness role, subject matter, key issues | | Chronology | Dates, sequences, timeline conflicts with cites | | Topical Summaries | Testimony organized by issue with cites | | Admissions | Claim/defense-supporting statements with cites | | Inconsistencies/Evasions | Conflicts, shifts, non-responsive answers with cites | | Objections Log | Topic, ground, response/ruling, page-line | | Exhibits Log | Exhibit ID, description, related testimony, page-line | | Open Follow-Ups | Missing docs, unclear testimony, recommended next steps |
- [ ] Validate transcript completeness and metadata
- [ ] Extract and index all substantive testimony with page-line cites
- [ ] Build topical sections aligned to pleadings and case themes
- [ ] Identify admissions, inconsistencies, evasions, and credibility issues
- [ ] Cross-reference timeline statements for internal conflicts
- [ ] Compile objections and exhibits logs
- [ ] Verify every citation against source transcript
- [ ] Flag open follow-ups and investigation gaps
| Request | Output | Rule | |---|---|---| | Factual retrieval | Quote/paraphrase with cites | Include all locations if testimony repeated | | Comparative | Side-by-side statements with cites | Explain evolution or contradiction | | Evaluative | Evidence inventory with cites | No legal conclusions; note ambiguity |
development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.