skills/legal/customs-protest-form19/SKILL.md
Drafts CBP Form 19 protests under 19 U.S.C. § 1514 and 19 C.F.R. Part 174 challenging tariff classification, valuation, origin, and trade preference decisions. Use when drafting customs protests, contesting liquidation decisions, or preparing Form 19 filings within the 180-day jurisdictional deadline.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills customs-protest-form19Install this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Draft a filing-ready protest preserving administrative and Court of International Trade review rights under 19 U.S.C. § 1514.
Gather before drafting:
Search uploads for:
| Data Point | Source | |---|---| | 11-digit entry number(s) | CF-7501, CBP correspondence | | Port code (3-digit) + name | Entry documents | | Entry date, liquidation date | CF-29, liquidation notice | | CBP-assigned HTSUS classification | CBP ruling/notice | | Declared vs. assessed value | Entry summary, CF-29 | | CBP-determined country of origin | CBP decision | | Verbatim CBP decision language | Decision letters, CF-29 |
Per contested entry:
For consolidated protests (19 C.F.R. § 174.33): define scope of entries covered.
Specify the exact determination challenged:
| Dispute Type | Required Detail | |---|---| | Classification | CBP-assigned HTSUS (chapter/heading/subheading/suffix) + duty rate | | Valuation | Declared value, CBP value, adjustments, valuation method | | Country of origin | CBP-determined origin, rules of origin framework | | Trade preference | Program (USMCA, GSP, etc.), denial basis | | AD/CVD | Order number, assessment rate, scope determination |
State when/how CBP communicated the decision to establish timeliness.
Frame as affirmative legal assertion:
Merchandise description — material composition (percentages), manufacturing method, physical characteristics, functional capabilities, end use, industry standards.
Classification disputes:
Valuation disputes:
All disputes:
List each with description: data sheets, expert reports/affidavits, prior CBP rulings on identical/similar merchandise, CIT decisions, industry publications, manufacturing documentation.
Include name, title, entity, date, contact info. If representative: identify principal, broker license or bar admission. Add 18 U.S.C. § 1001 certification statement.
development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.