casemark/custody-evaluation-summary
skills/legal/custody-evaluation-summary/SKILL.md
Summarizes custody evaluation reports into a structured memorandum covering evaluator credentials, methodology, parental findings, recommendations, and best-interests factor mapping. Use when reviewing custody evaluations, preparing for custody hearings or settlement conferences, or onboarding to contested parenting matters.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills custody-evaluation-summaryInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 27, 2026, 3:43 AM130.7s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- custody-evaluation-summary
- language:
- en
- description:
- Summarizes custody evaluation reports into a structured memorandum covering evaluator credentials, methodology, parental findings, recommendations, and best-interests factor mapping. Use when reviewing custody evaluations, preparing for custody hearings or settlement conferences, or onboarding to contested parenting matters.
Custody Evaluation Summary
Produces a structured memorandum from custody evaluation reports for quick reference in contested parenting matters.
Prerequisites
Before starting, collect:
- Custody evaluation report(s) with evaluator identity/credentials
- Psychological assessments, if administered
- Home study documents, if separate from main report
- Applicable jurisdiction for best-interests statute mapping
Quick Start
- Extract evaluation overview metadata into a structured table
- Catalog methodology (interviews, testing, home visits, collaterals)
- Build side-by-side parental findings comparison
- Summarize children's statements and observations
- Extract custody and parenting-time recommendations
- Map findings to jurisdictional best-interests factors
- Note contested issues and credibility concerns
- Flag safety concerns and next steps
Memorandum Sections
1. Evaluation Overview
Extract into a table:
| Field | Extract | |---|---| | Evaluator | Name, credentials, license number | | Evaluation dates | Start–end range | | Appointing authority | Court-ordered / stipulated / party-retained | | Report date | Final report date | | Children | Names, DOBs, grade/school | | Parents | Names, residences, household members |
2. Methodology
Check which procedures the evaluator employed:
- Parent interviews (number, total hours)
- Child interviews (format, observed/recorded)
- Psychological testing (instruments: MMPI-2, MCMI-IV, PAI, etc.)
- Home visits (dates, duration, attendees)
- Collateral contacts (list by name/role)
- Record review (medical, school, court, CPS, law enforcement)
- Parent-child observations (structured/unstructured)
Flag any standard element the evaluator omitted.
3. Findings by Parent
Side-by-side comparison for each parent:
| Category | Parent A | Parent B | |---|---|---| | Strengths | | | | Concerns | | | | Psychological testing results | | | | Home environment | | | | Parenting capacity | | | | Mental health | | | | Substance abuse | | | | DV / abuse history | | | | Willingness to co-parent | | |
4. Children's Statements and Observations
- Direct quotes where significant (age-appropriate only)
- Observed parent-child dynamics
- Child's expressed preferences (note age and maturity assessment)
- Emotional/behavioral concerns noted by evaluator
5. Collateral Source Input
| Source (Name/Role) | Key Information Provided | |---|---| | | |
6. Recommendations
| Element | Recommendation | |---|---| | Legal custody | Joint / sole — to whom | | Physical custody | Primary residence / shared schedule | | Regular parenting time | Weekday + weekend schedule | | Holiday/vacation | Key provisions | | Conditions/restrictions | Supervised visitation, therapy, substance monitoring | | Therapeutic interventions | For children, parents, or family | | Contingency plans | If evaluator provided any | | Modification triggers | Circumstances warranting future review |
7. Best-Interests Factor Mapping
Map findings to the jurisdiction's statutory factors. Common factors (adjust per state):
| Statutory Factor | Evaluator Finding | |---|---| | Child's adjustment to home/school/community | | | Mental and physical health of all parties | | | Parental capacity for love, affection, guidance | | | Child's reasonable preference (if sufficient maturity) | | | History of DV or abuse | | | Willingness to encourage other-parent relationship | | | Stability and continuity of caregiving | | | Other jurisdiction-specific factors | |
8. Contested Issues and Credibility
- Where recommendations align or conflict with each parent's position
- Methodology or conclusion concerns raised by either party
- If multiple evaluations exist: side-by-side comparison of differing findings
9. Next Steps
- Immediate safety concerns requiring urgent intervention
- Transition timeline for recommended arrangements
- Support services and follow-up evaluation schedule
Pitfalls and Checks
- Objectivity — Present findings without advocacy; do not opine on correctness
- Attribution — Use direct quotes for significant observations; cite page numbers
- Jurisdiction — Confirm the correct best-interests statute before mapping; factors vary by state
- Sensitivity — Redact or flag children's statements inappropriate for filings
- Multiple evaluations — Present side-by-side comparisons; do not privilege one over another
Key changes made:
- Description tightened to third-person with clear trigger guidance, under 1024 chars
- Added Quick Start section for at-a-glance workflow steps
- Removed "Output Structure" header layer — sections now live directly under "Memorandum Sections" (flatter, scans faster)
- Trimmed table labels (e.g., "Strengths identified" → "Strengths") for token efficiency
- Converted methodology checklist from checkbox format to plain bullets (checkboxes are for tracking agent progress, not describing evaluator procedures)
- Renamed "Guidelines" to "Pitfalls and Checks" per best-practices pattern, condensed from 7 bullets to 5 by merging redundant items
- Removed "Implementation & Next Steps" verbose phrasing, condensed to "Next Steps" with tighter bullets
- Overall reduced from 127 lines to ~120 while preserving all domain-critical structure and legal accuracy
Related Skills
casemark/medical-records-gap-analysis
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Sep 3, 2026
casemark/private-placement-memo
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/privacy-law-updates
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/prior-art-summary
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026