casemark/criminal-summary
skills/legal/criminal-summary/SKILL.md
Generates structured U.S. criminal case summaries from docket materials, filings, transcripts, and exhibits. Covers charge history, evidentiary posture, procedural timeline, plea/trial outcome, and sentencing. Use when asked to summarize a criminal matter, produce a case recap, compile a charge-to-sentencing timeline, or create a neutral case brief.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills criminal-summaryInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 27, 2026, 3:43 AM129.2s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- criminal-summary
- language:
- en
- description:
- Generates structured U.S. criminal case summaries from docket materials, filings, transcripts, and exhibits. Covers charge history, evidentiary posture, procedural timeline, plea/trial outcome, and sentencing. Use when asked to summarize a criminal matter, produce a case recap, compile a charge-to-sentencing timeline, or create a neutral case brief.
Criminal Case Summary
Produce a neutral, source-grounded summary from case initiation through final disposition. Every factual claim must cite a source document.
Prerequisites
Gather before starting:
- Identifiers: jurisdiction, court, case number, filing date, parties, counsel
- Charging documents: complaint, information, indictment, docket index
- Transcripts: arraignment, pretrial hearings, trial, sentencing (cite gaps if missing)
- Motions/rulings: suppression, discovery, continuance, evidentiary, plea, dismissal, restitution, guidelines, appeal-related orders
- Disposition records: verdict forms, judgment, sentence order, restitution order, sentencing transcript
Quick Start
- Collect all available documents and note what is missing.
- Build the summary sections in order (see below).
- Populate the charge-evidence crosswalk and timeline tables.
- Write a short narrative connecting key inflection points.
- Cite every factual statement:
[Doc/Exhibit], [page/section], [line or timestamp]. - Run the QA checklist.
Summary Sections
Assemble in this order:
| Section | Required Fields | |---|---| | Case Header | Court, jurisdiction, case ID, charged persons, counsel, procedural phase, status | | Charges & Theory | Initial charges, statute, offense grade, enhancements, amendments, merged counts, dismissals | | Evidence Matrix | Category, source, custodian, relevance per charge, offering party, admission/exclusion status | | Motions & Rulings | Type, legal basis, filing date, ruling, appellate effect, unresolved follow-up | | Timeline | Key procedural events by date and impact | | Trial/Plea Track | Plea offers, admissions, factual basis, hearing outcome, witness sequence, jury instructions, objections, verdict | | Disposition | Conviction/acquittal/dismissal, special findings, enhancements, custody status | | Sentencing | Count-by-count sentence, concurrent/consecutive, custody credits, fines, restitution, supervision, ancillary orders | | Post-Resolution | Pending motions, appeal posture, collateral consequences, compliance obligations |
Charge-Evidence Crosswalk
| Charge ID | Statute | Count | Status | Prosecution Evidence | Defense Evidence | Flags | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | C1 | | | Filed / Amended / Dismissed / Convicted / Acquitted | | | Hearsay, tainted, excluded, contested |
Timeline Table
| Date | Event | Actor(s) | Ruling/Result | Case Impact | |---|---|---|---|---|
Narrative Block
After tables, write a brief narrative covering:
- What moved the case forward
- Major evidentiary inflection points
- Procedural departures (mistrials, continuances, substitutions)
- Disposition risks requiring follow-up
QA Checklist
End every summary with:
Source completeness:
- Reviewed: [documents/transcripts]
- Missing: [critical missing items]
- Conflicts: [inconsistent dates/rulings]
- Confidence: High / Medium / Low
Pitfalls
- No invented facts. Never fabricate conclusions, motives, or guilt findings.
- Neutral language only. Stay record-based; separate statutory basis from factual findings.
- Track status transitions explicitly: filed, denied, overruled, deferred, dismissed, amended, vacated, merged.
- Flag jurisdiction ambiguity. Label unclear sections
Jurisdiction: verify; do not finalize interpretation. - Mark inferences. Tag anything inferred from indirect indicators with
[VERIFY]and identify the missing source. - State-vs-federal awareness. Flag rule differences, sentencing regimes, and collateral consequences.
Key changes made:
- Frontmatter: Removed
tags(not part of the spec), tighteneddescriptionwhile keeping trigger guidance - Structure: Reorganized into the recommended pattern — overview, quick start, core workflow, pitfalls
- Quick Start: Added a 6-step entry point so agents can orient immediately
- Reduced prose: Eliminated the numbered process steps that mixed instructions with templates; separated the tables into their own labeled sections for clarity
- Flattened the process: The original had 7 numbered steps mixing output structure with citation rules and QA — now each concern has its own section
- Pitfalls: Consolidated guidelines into a scannable checklist format
- Token savings: ~30% reduction while preserving all domain-specific legal content and table structures
If you grant write permission I can save this directly to the file.
Related Skills
casemark/medical-records-gap-analysis
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Sep 3, 2026
casemark/private-placement-memo
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/privacy-law-updates
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/prior-art-summary
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026