casemark/consent-judgment
skills/legal/consent-judgment/SKILL.md
Drafts enforceable consent judgments with injunctive relief for IP litigation settlement. Triggers when drafting consent judgments, agreed judgments, permanent injunctions, settlement judgments, or stipulated orders resolving disputes without trial.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills consent-judgmentInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 27, 2026, 3:39 AM265.3s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- consent-judgment
- language:
- en
- description:
- Drafts enforceable consent judgments with injunctive relief for IP litigation settlement. Triggers when drafting consent judgments, agreed judgments, permanent injunctions, settlement judgments, or stipulated orders resolving disputes without trial.
Consent Judgment and Injunction
Drafts an enforceable consent judgment with injunctive relief that memorializes a negotiated resolution while preserving the court's enforcement authority.
Quick Start
Gather before drafting:
- Complaint/pleadings — party names, capacities, case number, court/division
- Settlement terms — monetary amounts, payment schedules, admissions/denials, injunctive scope
- Governing contracts — underlying IP licenses, assignments, or agreements at issue
- Local rules — formatting, e-filing requirements, consent judgment approval procedures
Document Structure
1. Caption
- Court name with division, matching local formatting
- Case number exactly as docketed
- Party names matching original complaint with designations
- Title: "Consent Judgment and Injunction" or "Agreed Judgment and Permanent Injunction" per local practice
2. Recitals (WHEREAS Clauses)
Establish:
- [ ] Subject-matter and personal jurisdiction
- [ ] Nature of claims and defenses (neutral framing)
- [ ] Voluntary agreement to resolve without trial
- [ ] Representation by competent counsel; understanding of binding nature
- [ ] Statutory/procedural authority (cite FRCP or state equivalent)
- [ ] Whether resolution is on the merits or without merits adjudication
3. Substantive Terms
Monetary: Award amount, payment schedule, interest rate, default consequences, costs/fees allocation.
Non-monetary: Property transfers, document deliveries, specific performance with concrete deadlines. State admissions or denials of liability unambiguously.
4. Injunctive Relief
Draft with Rule 65(d) specificity — every prohibition or requirement must be concrete enough for a contempt proceeding.
| Component | Standard | |-----------|----------| | Prohibited conduct | Specific, measurable actions enjoined party must not take | | Required conduct | Exact actions, by whom, by when, to what standard | | Geographic scope | Precisely defined | | Duration | Permanent or time-limited; state modification standard | | Compliance monitoring | Reporting, inspection rights, third-party oversight | | Enforcement | Contempt procedures, modification/dissolution process |
Critical: Avoid vague language ("shall not engage in unfair practices"). Must be specific enough to enforce via contempt.
5. Releases and Waivers
- [ ] Mutual release scope — identify released claims, causes of action, parties with specificity
- [ ] Known/unknown claims — include Cal. Civ. Code § 1542 waiver or equivalent if applicable [VERIFY]
- [ ] Appeal waiver — explicit if agreed
- [ ] Carve-outs — claims against non-parties, unrelated matters, enforcement of this judgment
- [ ] Adequate consideration acknowledged
6. Jurisdiction Retention
Include continuing jurisdiction for: (a) enforcement; (b) interpretation/compliance disputes; (c) injunction modification on changed circumstances; (d) contempt proceedings.
Also address: notice requirements before enforcement motions, meet-and-confer obligations, prevailing-party fees in enforcement, expedited relief for imminent violations.
7. Execution and Approval
Signature blocks: All parties with authority-to-bind language; attorneys of record (name, bar number, contact); date lines.
Judicial approval: Proposed findings (fair, reasonable, voluntary, entered with counsel); separate court approval line; comply with e-filing format (e.g., /s/ signatures).
8. Formatting
- Numbered paragraphs throughout
- Full caption page 1; abbreviated on subsequent pages
- Certificate of service if required by local rules
- Consistent defined terms; proper citation format
Pitfalls and Checks
- Merits framing — unless parties agree otherwise, recitals should state this is not an adjudication on the merits
- FRE 408 — exclude settlement negotiation details usable against either party in related proceedings
- Enforceability — verify terms comply with substantive law and public policy; courts can refuse unconscionable consent judgments
- IP-specific — trademark: address mark usage going forward; patent: license-back provisions; trade secret: ensure injunction doesn't function as unenforceable non-compete
- Jurisdiction-specific — some courts require separate proposed orders, Tunney Act procedures (antitrust) [VERIFY], or approval for minors/incapacitated parties
- Do not include integration clauses conflicting with retained jurisdiction
- Do not draft releases that inadvertently release claims parties intend to preserve
Related Skills
casemark/medical-records-gap-analysis
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Sep 3, 2026
casemark/private-placement-memo
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/privacy-law-updates
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/prior-art-summary
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026