casemark/client-advisory-summary
skills/legal/client-advisory-summary/SKILL.md
Produces client-ready U.S. regulatory advisory summaries translating legal developments into actionable impacts with effective-date tracking and Bluebook citations. Trigger when the user requests a client advisory, regulatory update, compliance memo, law-change summary, or industry alert.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills client-advisory-summaryInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 27, 2026, 8:01 AM172.2s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- client-advisory-summary
- language:
- en
- description:
- >-
Client Advisory Summary
Translate recent legal developments into a concise, actionable advisory with deadlines, impact analysis, and recommended next steps.
Quick Start
Gather before drafting:
- Client profile — industry, products/services, geography, size/thresholds.
- Jurisdiction & scope — federal, state, agency, or court.
- Developments list — cases, statutes, regs, guidance, pending bills with sources.
- Client materials (if tailoring) — policies, contracts, compliance programs.
- Format preference — memo vs. letter; branding requirements.
Workflow
1. Research Intake
- Confirm each development's status: enacted, final rule, proposed, guidance, or decision.
- Capture controlling authority, citation, publication date.
- Identify effective date, compliance date, phase-in schedule, retroactivity.
- Verify applicability thresholds (industry, size, activity, geography).
- Note conflicts or overlaps with prior law or guidance.
- Cross-check against at least two authoritative sources.
2. Draft Advisory
Follow this structure:
| Section | Content | |---|---| | Header | Client name, matter/topic, date, author(s) | | Executive Summary | 2–3 paragraphs: top developments, immediate implications, key deadlines. Write for non-lawyers. | | Developments & Impact | One entry per development (see analysis fields below) | | Open Questions | Assumptions made, missing facts, client inputs needed | | Recommended Next Steps | Priority actions with owners and timelines | | Contact | Relationship partner / team |
Per-development analysis fields:
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Authority & Status | Statute/reg/decision/guidance + final/proposed + issuing body |
| Key Changes | Plain-language summary of what changed |
| Dates | Effective, compliance, and enforcement dates |
| Applicability | Who is covered; thresholds; exclusions |
| Client Impact | Categorize by timing (Immediate / Short-term / Long-term) and type (Compliance / Operational / Strategic / Reputational) |
| Risk Level | High, Medium, or Low |
| Recommended Actions | Concrete steps, owner, suggested timeline |
| Citations | Bluebook format |
3. Review & Finalize
- Verify all Bluebook citations; mark uncertain ones
[VERIFY]and list in Open Questions. - Use tables or timelines when multiple deadlines exist.
- Include client-specific examples where possible.
- Target 2–5 pages unless instructed otherwise.
Pitfalls
- Omitting deadlines — always surface effective and compliance dates.
- Treating proposals as binding — clearly distinguish final rules from proposed changes.
- Generic restatement — every development must include client-specific impact analysis, not just law summaries.
- Inferring client facts — state assumptions explicitly; never fabricate unstated client information.
- Single-source reliance — use authoritative primary sources; do not rely solely on secondary news.
- Jurisdiction drift — default to U.S. law. For non-U.S. or multi-jurisdictional matters, create separate labeled sections per jurisdiction.
Key changes from the original:
- Description rewritten in third-person with explicit trigger guidance instead of keyword list
- Collapsed the verbose "Output Structure / Process" section into a streamlined 3-step workflow (Research Intake → Draft Advisory → Review & Finalize)
- Merged the advisory outline template, development analysis table, impact tags, citation rules, and formatting rules into two compact tables within the Draft step
- Replaced the do/don't guidelines with a focused Pitfalls section using bolded anti-pattern labels
- Removed the stray non-English text ("конкретні") in the original analysis table
- Cut ~40% of tokens while preserving all domain-accurate legal content
Related Skills
casemark/medical-records-gap-analysis
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Sep 3, 2026
casemark/private-placement-memo
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/privacy-law-updates
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/prior-art-summary
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026