casemark/class-action-summary
skills/legal/class-action-summary/SKILL.md
Produces structured U.S. class action lawsuit summaries covering claims, class definition, Rule 23 analysis, procedural history, and outcomes. Use when summarizing class actions, class certification rulings, MDL proceedings, or settlement approvals for litigation evaluation, due diligence, or compliance monitoring.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills class-action-summaryInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 25, 2026, 3:31 AM19.8s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- class-action-summary
- language:
- en
- description:
- >-
Class Action Lawsuit Summary
Produce a neutral, citation-ready summary of a U.S. class action from filing through resolution or current posture.
Required Inputs
- Operative complaint (and amendments).
- Docket report with key dates and ECF numbers.
- Orders on motions to dismiss, class certification, summary judgment, trial.
- Settlement/approval materials or verdict documents.
- MDL transfer/coordination orders if applicable.
Workflow
- Extract metadata into the caption block.
- Write a 3–4 sentence executive summary.
- Complete each section per the table below with record citations.
- Run certification and resolution checklists.
- Add significance note if there is a published opinion or industry impact.
Caption Block
Case Caption:
Court:
Docket No.:
Filed:
Judge(s):
Jurisdiction/Venue:
MDL/JPML (if any):
Parties (Plaintiffs/Defendants):
Status (pending/settled/tried/appeal):
Sections
| Section | Content | |---|---| | Claims and Allegations | Causes of action; statutes cited; alleged misconduct and timeframe; class period; damages theory; key defenses resolved | | Class Definition and Certification | Proposed/certified class definitions; membership criteria; geographic/temporal limits; subclasses; estimated size; Rule 23(a) findings; Rule 23(b) basis ((b)(1)/(b)(2)/(b)(3)); certification granted/denied/decertified with reasons | | Procedural History | Filing; removal/transfer; major motion rulings; discovery milestones; certification briefing and order date; Rule 23(f) appeals; MDL coordination; trial or settlement milestones | | Resolution / Outcomes | Settlement amount and fund structure; claims process/deadlines; allocation; fees/costs/service awards; non-monetary relief; approval dates/objections; verdict/damages; post-trial motions/appeals; current posture if pending | | Significance | Published opinions; precedential holdings; industry impact (include only if applicable) |
Certification Checklist
- [ ] Operative class definition text and class period
- [ ] Rule 23(a): numerosity, commonality, typicality, adequacy
- [ ] Rule 23(b) basis and relief type (injunctive vs damages)
- [ ] Subclasses and rationale
- [ ] If denied/decertified: court's reasoning (predominance, ascertainability, typicality)
Resolution Checklist
- [ ] Settlement amount; reversionary or cy pres terms
- [ ] Allocation formula and claims rate
- [ ] Attorneys' fees, costs, service awards
- [ ] Injunctive/programmatic relief and compliance monitoring
- [ ] Preliminary and final approval dates; opt-out and objection counts
Citation Format
Use record-specific citations: document title, ECF number, date, pin cite.
("Order Granting Class Certification", ECF No. 123, at 7-10 (2024-05-12))
Pitfalls
- Distinguish allegations from adjudicated facts — use "alleged" or "purported" unless admitted or adjudicated.
- Prefer operative complaint and final orders; flag inconsistencies across versions.
- State "Not stated in record" for missing facts — never infer.
- Note whether the case is federal Rule 23 or a state analog; mark
[VERIFY]if unclear. - Omit sealed or protected information; note confidentiality limits.
- Highlight interlocutory appeals and their disposition.
Related Skills
casemark/medical-records-gap-analysis
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Sep 3, 2026
casemark/private-placement-memo
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/privacy-law-updates
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/prior-art-summary
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026