skills/legal/citation-bluebook/SKILL.md
Formats legal citations per The Bluebook (21st ed.) using Bluepages practitioner conventions. Use when citing authority in court filings, checking citation format, drafting briefs or memoranda, or formatting a table of authorities.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills citation-bluebookInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Practitioner-format citation rules (Bluepages) for cases, statutes, rules, regulations, and secondary sources.
Most common pattern — full case citation with pincite:
Smith v. Jones, 123 F.3d 456, 458 (9th Cir. 2020)
Structure: Party v. Party, Vol. Reporter Pg., Pincite (Court Year)
| Form | Pattern | Example | |------|---------|---------| | Full | Party v. Party, Vol. Reporter Pg., Pincite (Court Year) | Smith v. Jones, 123 F.3d 456, 458 (9th Cir. 2020) | | Short | Party, Vol. Reporter at Pincite | Smith, 123 F.3d at 459 | | Id. | Id. at Pincite | Id. at 460 | | Subsequent history | Append with comma | Smith v. Jones, 123 F.3d 456 (9th Cir. 2020), aff'd, 540 U.S. 100 (2003) |
Key rules:
| Type | Example | |------|---------| | Federal statute | 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) | | State statute | Cal. Civ. Code § 1542 (West 2020) | | U.S. Constitution | U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1 | | State constitution | Cal. Const. art. I, § 7 |
| Type | Example | |------|---------| | Fed. R. Civ. P. | Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) | | Fed. R. Evid. | Fed. R. Evid. 702 | | Fed. R. App. P. | Fed. R. App. P. 28(a) | | C.F.R. | 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(j) (2020) | | Fed. Reg. | 85 Fed. Reg. 12,345 (Mar. 2, 2020) |
| Type | Example | |------|---------| | Restatement | Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 90 (Am. L. Inst. 1981) | | Treatise | 5 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1216 (3d ed. 2004) | | Law review | Sunstein, On the Expressive Function of Law, 144 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2021, 2025 (1996) | | A.L.R. | Annotation, Title, 100 A.L.R.5th 1 (2002) | | Black's Law Dict. | Term, Black's Law Dictionary (12th ed. 2024) |
| Signal | Use | |--------|-----| | [none] | Direct support — source states the proposition | | See | Supports with inference required | | See also | Additional, less direct support | | Accord | Multiple sources state same rule | | Cf. | Support by analogy | | But see | Directly contrary | | But cf. | Contrary by analogy | | See generally | Background or general support |
Changes from original:
tags from frontmatter (not part of the spec — only name and description)development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.