skills/legal/certificate-of-service/SKILL.md
Drafts certificates of service (proofs of service) for court filings. Use when a filing must be accompanied by proof that copies were served on all parties or counsel. Covers FRCP Rule 5, state equivalents, ECF/e-service, U.S. mail, hand delivery, and overnight courier methods.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills certificate-of-serviceInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Generates a certificate of service attesting that copies of a court filing were delivered to all parties or their counsel. Supports federal (FRCP 5) and state court requirements.
Gather from the user:
Then produce a certificate matching the output template below.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on [DATE], I served a true and correct copy of the
foregoing [DOCUMENT TITLE] on the following by [SERVICE METHOD]:
[PARTY/COUNSEL LIST with addresses]
Dated: [DATE]
____________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]
[BAR NUMBER]
[FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[PHONE]
[EMAIL]
| Method | Certificate Language | When | |--------|---------------------|------| | ECF/E-filing | "via the Court's CM/ECF system, which will send notification to all registered counsel of record" | Federal and most state e-filing systems | | Email | "via electronic mail to the email address(es) listed below" | Parties consented per FRCP 5(b)(2)(E) | | U.S. Mail | "by placing a true and correct copy in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, addressed to" | Default fallback; adds 3 days under FRCP 6(d) | | Hand Delivery | "by hand delivery to the office of" | Same-day service needed | | Overnight Courier | "via overnight courier service (e.g., FedEx, UPS) to" | Time-sensitive, mail too slow |
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on February 20, 2025, I electronically filed the
foregoing DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS with the Clerk of Court using the
CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all counsel
of record registered in this case.
Dated: February 20, 2025
/s/ Jane Smith
Jane Smith (Bar No. 12345)
Smith & Associates LLP
100 Main Street, Suite 400
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 555-0100
[email protected]
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on February 20, 2025, I served a true and correct
copy of the foregoing PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORIES on the
following:
Via U.S. Mail, First-Class Postage Prepaid:
John Doe, Esq.
Doe Law Group
200 Oak Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90001
Via Electronic Mail:
Sarah Lee, Esq. ([email protected])
Lee & Partners
300 Pine Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
Dated: February 20, 2025
____________________________
Robert Johnson (SBN 67890)
Johnson Legal PC
500 Elm Boulevard
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 555-0200
[email protected]
| Issue | Resolution | |-------|------------| | Unsure if counsel is on ECF | Check CM/ECF or PACER docket. If no electronic appearance, serve by mail. | | Pro se party without address | Use address of record from court docket. If none, note "last known address." | | Government entity service | May require service on U.S. Attorney under FRCP 4(i). Check local rules. |
Key changes from the original:
description frontmatter with trigger guidance ("Use when...")tags (not part of the authoring-skills spec frontmatter)development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.