skills/legal/case-intake-initial-fact-memo/SKILL.md
Generates a structured attorney work product memorandum from an initial client consultation for commercial litigation. Extracts verifiable facts from uploaded documents, builds a chronological narrative, identifies parties and contracts, flags preliminary legal claims and defenses, and produces a prioritized action plan. Triggers at matter intake when a business client needs a foundational case evaluation document for a pre-filing commercial dispute.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills case-intake-initial-fact-memoInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Produces an attorney work product memorandum capturing the initial consultation for a commercial litigation matter. Serves as the foundational document for case evaluation and strategy.
Intake-[YYYY-MM-DD] as identifierInclude: Matter/Case No., Date Prepared, Prepared By, Supervising Attorney, Client (full legal entity name), Subject line as Initial Fact Memo: [Client] – [Dispute Type] – [Brief Description].
3–5 paragraph narrative covering:
No liability conclusions — frame as facts and preliminary observations only.
| Date | Event | Parties Involved | Source / Citation | |------|-------|-----------------|-------------------|
[Client Statement], [Doc: filename, p. X], or [Unverified]| Party | Full Legal Name | Jurisdiction | Role | Status | |-------|----------------|--------------|------|--------|
Include client, adverse parties, and third-party witnesses.
For each material agreement, document:
Potential claims (client as claimant):
| Claim | Elements | Supporting Facts (cite) | Apparent Strength | Likely Defenses | |-------|----------|------------------------|-------------------|-----------------|
Potential counterclaims / client exposure:
| Claim | Factual Basis | Preliminary Defenses | |-------|--------------|---------------------|
Threshold issues checklist:
Monetary: Direct damages, consequential/lost profits (methodology + assumptions), incidental, statutory/punitive (cite statute), attorneys' fees (contract/statute §).
Contractual modifiers: Liquidated damages, liability caps, consequential exclusions — cite § for each.
Non-monetary: Specific performance, injunction, declaratory judgment, rescission, accounting — state basis for inadequacy of legal remedies.
Business objectives beyond recovery: Relationship preservation, confidentiality, precedent, competitive protection.
| Item | Date / Status | Notes | |------|--------------|-------|
Track: demand letters, litigation filings, arbitration demands, administrative proceedings, SOL deadlines, contractual notice deadlines, response deadlines, litigation hold status.
| # | Document | Date | Author / Recipients | Relevance | Evidentiary Issues | |---|----------|------|--------------------|-----------|--------------------|
| Priority | Action | Responsible | Deadline | Consequence of Delay | |----------|--------|-------------|----------|---------------------|
Always include:
Note client decisions needed (file vs. negotiate, preliminary injunction, fee arrangement) and additional information needed (documents, witnesses, factual clarifications).
Every document cited in the memo must appear in an attachment index or its absence explained. Organize by category: contracts, correspondence, financial records, corporate/organizational docs, administrative.
[Client Statement], [Doc: name, p. X], or [Unverified]preliminary analysis suggests, subject to further research)[VERIFY] on any legal citation whose current validity is uncertainIntake-[YYYY-MM-DD] format throughout; update on assignment[VERIFY] — never present unconfirmed authority as settled lawdevelopment
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.