casemark/body-camera-incident-summary
skills/legal/body-camera-incident-summary/SKILL.md
Transforms police body camera transcripts into structured 10-section legal summaries with timestamp-cited verbatim statements, constitutional issue spotting, evidence inventory, and probable cause articulation. Maintains strict neutrality for all parties. Use when analyzing BWC footage for discovery, pre-trial prep, or trial. Trigger: body camera, BWC, body worn camera, officer footage, use of force review, incident summary.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills body-camera-incident-summaryInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 25, 2026, 3:30 AM26.2s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- body-camera-incident-summary
- language:
- en
- description:
- >-
- discovery, pre-trial prep, or trial. Trigger:
- body camera, BWC, body worn
Body Camera Incident Summary
Produces a neutral 10-section legal summary from police body camera transcripts. Every factual claim cited [HH:MM:SS]. All dialogue verbatim — never paraphrase. Flag recording gaps at point of occurrence.
Prerequisites
- Transcript(s) — complete BWC transcript(s); load all officer feeds if multiple
- Supplemental materials (optional) — incident reports, dispatch logs, officer statements
- Matter phase — discovery, pre-trial, or trial (affects emphasis)
Quick Start
- Ingest all BWC transcripts and supplemental materials
- Produce sections 1–10 in order below
- Cite every factual claim
[HH:MM:SS]; cross-reference timestamps across camera angles for force/search events - Flag issues in Section 10 with category tags and recommended next steps
Output Sections
1. Case Information
| Field | Content | |-------|---------| | Date/Time | Recording start with time zone | | Officers | Name, badge, role (primary/backup/supervisor/K-9/FTO) | | Location | Address or intersection, city, county, state | | Tracking IDs | Case no., incident no., CAD no. | | Duration | Final timestamp; note late start or early cutoff | | Technical deficiencies | Muted segments, obstructed views, interrupted recording |
State absent info explicitly — never infer.
2. Executive Summary
4–6 sentences: initiating event (traffic stop, Terry stop, dispatch, warrant, community caretaking), escalation/de-escalation arc, disposition (arrest/cite/release), primary legal issues (4A stop/search, Miranda, Graham v. Connor, qualified immunity).
3. Participant Identification
- Subjects: name/alias
[timestamp], warrants, probation/parole, medical/intoxication indicators - Officers: name, badge, role; FTO/trainee relationship
- Third parties: relationship to subject; detained, questioned, or released
4. Chronological Timeline
Strict [HH:MM:SS] narrative at each inflection point:
| Milestone | Document | |-----------|----------| | Initiating event | Articulated basis — violation, RS factors, dispatch info | | Search discussions | Complete officer dialogue revealing legal theory | | Detention → arrest | PC statement; formal arrest language | | Miranda | Verbatim warnings + subject response to each component | | Each search | Scope, justification, temporal relation to consent/PC | | Use of force | Commands (exact) → subject response type → force applied → interval → injury/medical | | Contraband | Legal basis (plain view/consent/SITA/other); ownership claims verbatim | | Database/dispatch | Warrant hits, effect on PC development | | Supervisor arrival | Timestamp, stated purpose | | Evidence collection | On-scene chain of custody actions |
5. Constitutional & Procedural Analysis
4th Amendment
- Stop validity: traffic (Whren), Terry (Terry v. Ohio), extension (Rodriguez)
- Consent: exact language + response; voluntariness (Schneckloth v. Bustamonte)
- PC warrantless: Carroll (vehicle); inventory pretext analysis
- SITA: Gant (vehicle), Riley (cell phone)
- K-9: sniff justification, detention duration, alert description, Florida v. Harris
5th Amendment / Miranda
- Custody attachment moment; verbatim warnings; flag deviations
- Waiver: knowing/voluntary/intelligent (Colorado v. Connelly)
- Invocations: exact language; Edwards / Davis compliance
- Post-invocation questioning → suppression flag
Use of Force — Graham v. Connor
- Severity of crime; immediate threat; active resistance/flight
- Force proportionality; temporal gap (compliance → continued force)
- Contemporaneous justification verbatim; flag post-hoc rationalization
Arrest Authority — PC articulation; warrant or warrantless analysis
Additional: 1A (recording police), 6A (counsel invocation), state constitutional provisions, Brady/Giglio disclosure
6. Physical Evidence Catalog
Table per item: description, discovery timestamp, location, legal basis, ownership claims, chain of custody actions.
Detail by type:
- Controlled substances: type, form, packaging, field test, weight, use vs. distribution indicators
- Firearms: type, make/model, loaded status, serial
- Currency: denominations, total, forfeiture warnings
- Paraphernalia: items, residue, usable quantities
7. Verbatim Statements & Legal Admissions
Format: "[exact quote]" — [SPEAKER] [HH:MM:SS]
Organize by category: admissions/inculpatory, exculpatory/denials, rights invocations (note officer response), inconsistent statements (chronological), excited utterances, third-party statements, comprehension/capacity disclosures.
Excerpt lengthy statements with ellipses. Never paraphrase statements bearing on legal interpretation.
8. Officer Observations & PC Articulation
| Type | Capture | |------|---------| | Olfactory | Odor description, source, fresh vs. burnt; alcohol breath vs. vehicle | | Visual | Furtive movements, plain view items, impairment indicators | | Auditory | Slurred speech, concealment sounds, overheard conversations | | Training/experience | Verbatim interpretations | | Standardized tests | FSTs, PBT result, DRE findings, refusals | | Threat/safety | Weapon bulges, posturing, environmental factors |
Reproduce RS/PC articulation verbatim. Flag post-hoc rationalization.
9. Disposition & Post-Arrest
- Arrests: charges (felony/misdemeanor), enhancements
- Citations: violation, court date
- Releases: stated reason (may reveal evidentiary weakness)
- Vehicles: impound basis, inventory procedures, third-party release
- Evidence: lab submissions, safekeeping, currency forfeiture
- Transport: destination, medical clearance
- Post-arrest statements: Miranda status; patrol vehicle admissions
- Victims/witnesses: contact info, injury documentation, protective orders
10. Critical Issues for Further Review
Flag each with category tag, specific facts, legal framework, and recommended next step.
| Tag | Issue |
|-----|-------|
| [SUPPRESS] | 4A/5A violation → suppression motion |
| [MIRANDA] | Equivocal invocation; post-invocation questioning |
| [FORCE] | Disproportionate force; Graham excessive force claim |
| [GAP] | Audio/video deficiency at critical moment |
| [CONFLICT] | Timestamp/narrative inconsistency |
| [DISCOVERY] | Brady/Giglio material; informant disclosure |
| [POLICY] | Department policy deviation; municipal liability |
| [WITNESS] | Bystander location; chain of custody deficiency |
| [EXPERT] | Training/certification requiring review |
Pitfalls
- Neutrality: Document inculpatory and exculpatory evidence with equal precision
- Absent info: Affirmatively state when data is missing — never infer or speculate
- Verbatim standard: Never paraphrase rights invocations, consent exchanges, or admissions
- Multiple feeds: Cross-reference timestamps across camera angles for force and search events
- Jurisdiction: US federal floor; note state provisions providing greater protection
- Uncertain citations: Mark with
[VERIFY]
Related Skills
casemark/skills/legal/automated-contract-summary
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 26, 2026
casemark/obligation-mapping
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026
casemark/horizon-scanning
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026
casemark/gap-analysis
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.
21SKILL.mdUpdated May 25, 2026