casemark/biotech-patent-summaries
skills/legal/biotech-patent-summaries/SKILL.md
Summarizes biotech patent families and disputes into litigation-ready intelligence briefs. Trigger when the user provides patent applications, issued patents, PTAB filings, prosecution histories, licensing materials, or litigation documents in biotechnology domains and requests a summary, risk assessment, or FTO analysis.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills biotech-patent-summariesInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 25, 2026, 3:29 AM20.5s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- biotech-patent-summaries
- language:
- en
- description:
- >-
Biotechnology Patent Summaries
Produce a source-grounded intelligence brief on biotech patents and disputes for litigation, portfolio, and executive decisions.
Quick Start
- Collect inputs: patent corpus, dispute materials, parties/products map, jurisdiction scope, and clear objective (litigation exposure, licensing, design-around, or FTO).
- Run the core workflow below.
- Deliver the output template with uncertainty tags on every analytical assertion.
Core Workflow
- Ingest & normalize — Gather patent identity, claim sets, prosecution history, and dispute metadata. Normalize dates to ISO format. Define technical terms on first use.
- Extract & map claims — Identify independent claims first, quote critical language verbatim, then map dependents and fallback embodiments.
- Analyze validity/infringement — Test enforceability vectors:
- §101 eligibility (methods, diagnostics, natural products)
- §102/103 novelty and obviousness
- §112 enablement/written description (especially genus claims over biological matter)
- Assess procedural & business impact — Quantify litigation risk (timeline, injunction exposure, claim-construction volatility), cross-jurisdiction differences, and commercial consequences.
- Compile deliverable — Fill the output template; tag every item as confirmed fact, party argument, or analytical assessment.
Input Capture
| Bucket | Key Fields | |---|---| | Patent identity | Patent/app no., family ID, filing/priority/grant dates, assignee | | Technical scope | Mechanism, target, platform, key molecules/processes | | Claim set | Independent/dependent claims, types, limitations, embodiments | | Status | Pending/granted/abandoned, IPR/opposition posture, deadlines | | Dispute metadata | Court/tribunal, parties, accused products, allegations | | Procedural calendar | Hearings, motions, claim construction, trial dates (with certainty rating) | | Strategic posture | Commercial significance, exclusivity, competitor landscape, remedies sought |
Output Template
# [Matter Title]
Current through: [DATE]
## 1) Executive Summary
Three short paragraphs: patent landscape, key legal issues, action recommendations.
## 2) Patent/Dispute Snapshot
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Identifier | |
| Jurisdiction(s) | |
| Parties | |
| Status | |
| Urgency | |
## 3) Claim & Scope Analysis
| Claim # | Text excerpt | Breadth | FTO relevance | Risk flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
## 4) Validity & Prior-Art Assessment
| Ground | Basis | Record support | Counterargument strength | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
## 5) Infringement Analysis
| Accused product/method | Claim-mapped match | Defense argument space | Exposure |
|---|---|---|---|
## 6) Dispute Timeline
| Date | Event | Forum | Strategic effect |
|---|---|---|---|
## 7) Strategic Recommendations
- [ ] Litigation strategy
- [ ] Licensing / settlement
- [ ] Design-around / alternative pathway
- [ ] Portfolio filing or challenge
- [ ] Regulatory and exclusivity coordination
## 8) Uncertainty Register
Confirmed facts | Documented allegations | Analytical assumptions | Open gaps
Deliverable Rules
- Citation discipline — Cite patent numbers, claim/paragraph refs, docket entries; no uncited assertions.
- Scope discipline — Label each statement as fact, party argument, or analysis.
- Technical precision — Keep scientific language exact; do not oversimplify in ways that change meaning.
- Jurisdiction tags — Label every legal standard by jurisdiction and confidence level.
- Currency — State explicit "current through" date and stop-line assumptions.
Pitfalls & Checks
- No legal advice; provide neutral counsel-grade analysis only.
- Default to US jurisdiction unless explicitly labeled otherwise.
- Do not overstate claim scope where specification support is thin.
- Flag missing records as "needs confirmation" — never infer.
- [VERIFY] Confirm current case law before finalizing eligibility/invalidation analysis, especially for biotech diagnostic and sequence-related claims.
- [VERIFY] Cross-check AIA first-inventor-to-file effects, PGR/IPR timing windows, and equitable doctrines for US patents.
- For biologics, evaluate regulatory exclusivities (orphan, pediatric, biologics data exclusivity) alongside patent rights.
Related Skills
casemark/medical-records-gap-analysis
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Sep 3, 2026
casemark/private-placement-memo
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/privacy-law-updates
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/prior-art-summary
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026