skills/legal/appellate-mandate/SKILL.md
Drafts formal appellate mandates that conclude the appeal process and direct trial courts to implement appellate decisions. Extracts disposition language, remand directives, and procedural history from appellate records to construct jurisdiction-specific mandate orders. Use when preparing mandate orders, returning jurisdiction to lower courts, or formalizing appellate dispositions after ruling.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills appellate-mandateInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Drafts the formal order issued by an appellate court concluding the appeal and directing the trial court to implement the appellate decision.
Gather before drafting:
| Element | Requirement | |---|---| | Court name | Full formal name of issuing appellate court | | Receiving court | Full formal name of trial court | | Party designations | Mirror appellate record exactly | | Case numbers | Both appellate and trial court numbers | | Opening recital | "This mandate is issued pursuant to this Court's judgment dated [date]..." |
Standard formulation matching actual disposition:
IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the [trial court] is [AFFIRMED / REVERSED / REVERSED AND REMANDED / MODIFIED / DISMISSED].
For remands, specify with particularity:
| Remand Type | Required Specificity | |---|---| | New trial | All issues or only specified matters | | Entry of judgment | In whose favor and on what basis | | Partial remand | Which issues are foreclosed vs. open | | Conditional (e.g., remittitur) | Exact conditions and implementation steps | | Damages/remedies | Calculation instructions or caps from opinion |
Extract and incorporate verbatim any limiting language from the opinion regarding scope of proceedings on remand.
Calculate issuance date per applicable rules:
| Jurisdiction | Typical Auto-Issuance Period | |---|---| | Federal (FRAP 41) | 7 days after rehearing petition deadline expires | | Most state courts | 21–30 days after final judgment |
Address in sequence:
Include clerk certification with: court name, judgment date, applicable rule citation, seal, clerk signature, and issuance date.
Filing instructions for trial court clerk:
[VERIFY][VERIFY]Key changes from the original:
tools
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
development
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
data-ai
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
testing
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.