casemark/appellant-brief
skills/legal/appellant-brief/SKILL.md
Drafts the appellant's opening brief challenging a lower court decision in federal or state appellate courts. Covers issue selection, standard of review framing, record citation, argument structure, and procedural compliance under FRAP 28/32 or state equivalents. Use when preparing an appellant's opening brief, selecting appellate issues, structuring appellate arguments, or demonstrating reversible error on appeal.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add casemark/skills appellant-briefInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 25, 2026, 3:28 AM55.2s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- appellant-brief
- language:
- en
- description:
- >-
Appellate Brief — Appellant
Drafts the appellant's opening brief demonstrating reversible error through the record while overcoming deference to the court below.
Prerequisites
- Lower court decision — opinion, order, or judgment being appealed
- Trial record — transcripts, exhibits, motions, and orders
- Preservation map — where each issue was raised and ruled on below
- Appellate rules — FRAP 28/32 or state equivalent, local rules, word limits
- Filing deadline — from notice of appeal or court order
Output Structure
Front Matter
| Element | Notes | |---|---| | Cover page | Appellant typically red under FRAP 32 [VERIFY] | | Corporate disclosure | If applicable | | Table of Contents | Use argumentative headings | | Table of Authorities | Include pin cites | | Jurisdictional statement | Basis, finality, timeliness |
Statement of Issues
- Frame 1–3 issues as questions suggesting reversal
- Each must have been preserved below
- Order strongest to weakest
Statement of the Case
Procedural history: filing, key motions, rulings, judgment, post-trial motions.
Statement of facts:
- Narrate from the record favoring reversal
- Cite record extensively (transcript pages, exhibit numbers)
- Include facts the lower court overlooked or mischaracterized
- Be scrupulously accurate — misrepresenting the record destroys credibility
Summary of Argument
1–2 pages; each paragraph maps to a major argument heading.
Argument
For each issue:
| Step | Content | |---|---| | Standard of review | Identify and cite controlling authority | | Preservation | Where raised and ruled on below | | Legal framework | Governing rule with controlling authority | | Error identification | What the lower court got wrong | | Application | Correct application of law to record requires reversal | | Prejudice/harm | Error affected the outcome (not harmless) |
Conclusion
State specific relief: reverse, reverse and remand, or reverse and render.
Certificates and Addenda
- Certificate of Compliance (word count, typeface)
- Certificate of Service
- Addendum with constitutional/statutory provisions or key orders, if required
Standard of Review Quick Reference
| Standard | Burden on Appellant | Framing Strategy | |---|---|---| | De novo | Show correct legal interpretation | Make strongest affirmative case for your reading | | Abuse of discretion | Show irrational or unsupported reasoning | Attack the logic and evidentiary basis | | Clearly erroneous | Show finding against clear weight of evidence | Marshal record evidence contradicting the finding |
Guidelines
- Fewer issues win — select 1–3 strong issues; scattershot briefing dilutes credibility
- Cite the record relentlessly — appellate courts decide on the record, not new arguments
- Use argumentative headings that state conclusions
- Distinguish unfavorable authority rather than ignoring it
- Address harmless error proactively for each issue
- Never misrepresent the record — appellate judges check citations
- Verify all authority or mark
[VERIFY] - Jurisdiction note: confirm FRAP vs. state appellate rules; local rules may impose additional requirements
Related Skills
casemark/medical-records-gap-analysis
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Audits the complete in-scope medical-record universe in a litigation matter and produces an attorney-facing, Bates-cited analysis of treatment gaps, missing records or providers, baseline coverage, material billing or production mismatches, and complaint evolution. Use when asked to find missing medical records, analyze treatment gaps or first-care timing, identify absent providers, assess whether a production is complete, or prepare a records-request target list. Use medical-record-chronology instead when the primary request is a chronological clinical narrative.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Sep 3, 2026
casemark/private-placement-memo
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/privacy-law-updates
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured privacy and data protection law briefings across US, EU, UK, and other jurisdictions. Organizes by jurisdiction with compliance deadlines, enforcement actions, and legislative changes. Use when preparing privacy law briefings, compliance updates, regulatory change summaries, or data protection landscape reviews.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026
casemark/prior-art-summary
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Generates structured summaries of prior art references for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments. Maps disclosures to claim elements with precise citations. Use when summarizing prior art, analyzing patent landscapes, mapping references to claims, or preparing office action responses.
40SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 17, 2026