skills/legal/ada-failure-to-accommodate-complaint/SKILL.md
Drafts a court-ready ADA failure-to-accommodate complaint under Title I (employment, 42 U.S.C. § 12112) or Title III (public accommodations, 42 U.S.C. § 12182). Structures jurisdiction, EEOC exhaustion, factual allegations, causes of action, and relief. Use when drafting ADA disability discrimination complaints, reasonable accommodation pleadings, or civil rights complaints for plaintiffs with disabilities.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills ada-failure-to-accommodate-complaintInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Drafts a federal complaint for ADA failure-to-accommodate claims under Title I (employment) or Title III (public accommodations). Structures all required sections to satisfy Twombly/Iqbal plausibility.
Gather before drafting:
COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT2–4 sentences: statute invoked (Title I or III, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), plaintiff's disability and limitation, accommodation denied, harm suffered.
| Party | Allege | |-------|--------| | Plaintiff | Name, residence, disability status under § 12102 | | Defendant (Title I) | Legal name, business form, ≥ 15 employees for ≥ 20 weeks — § 12111(5) | | Defendant (Title III) | Owns/operates place of public accommodation — § 12181(7) category |
| Basis | Citation | |-------|----------| | Federal question | 28 U.S.C. § 1331 | | Title I enforcement | 42 U.S.C. § 12117(a) | | Title III enforcement | 42 U.S.C. § 12188 | | Supplemental state claims | 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a) | | Venue | 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) |
EEOC exhaustion (Title I — plead all three):
Draft numbered paragraphs in chronological order:
Count I — Title I Failure to Accommodate, § 12112(a) & (b)(5)(A):
Count II — Title III Failure to Modify (if applicable), § 12182(a) & (b)(2)(A)(ii):
Count III — Retaliation (if applicable), § 12203(a):
Count IV — State law (if applicable): Cite state statute; allege same operative facts; assert supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a).
Title I: Reinstatement or front pay; back pay with prejudgment interest; compensatory damages; punitive damages; attorney's fees (§ 12205); pre/post-judgment interest.
Title III: Permanent injunction; declaratory judgment; compensatory damages to extent permitted (supplement with state claims); attorney's fees (§ 12205).
Do not plead specific dollar amounts in federal court — FRCP 8(a)(3).
"Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable." — FRCP 38(b). Omit for Title III-only complaints seeking primarily injunctive relief.
Date, attorney signature (per local ECF rules), bar number, firm name, address, phone, email. "Attorney for Plaintiff." Include plaintiff verification under penalty of perjury if required by local rules.
development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.