skills/legal/510k-premarket-notification/SKILL.md
Drafts FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification submissions demonstrating substantial equivalence under 21 CFR Part 807. Supports Traditional, Special, and Abbreviated pathways. Use when preparing Class II medical device regulatory filings, substantial equivalence analyses, or FDA premarket submissions.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills 510k-premarket-notificationInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Drafts a complete 510(k) submission package demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device under 21 CFR Part 807, Subpart E.
Gather before drafting:
Address to appropriate CDRH division. Include device trade name + common name, 510(k) type, predicate (name, manufacturer, K-number), pathway justification (why 510(k) vs. PMA), submitter contact with establishment registration, and U.S. agent if foreign manufacturer.
Complete all fields: applicant legal name and FDA registration number, trade name + common name, product code / regulation number / panel / class, submission type (original or resubmission with prior K-number), 510(k) type, disclosure election (Summary or Statement), contact info, and signature block with authorized representative.
Enable reviewer comprehension without physical examination:
Reference engineering drawings, cross-sections, and annotated photos.
Critical: IU language must be identical across labeling, submission, and Form 3514. Any divergence from predicate IU requires justification. Every indication must be supported by performance data.
Present as side-by-side table comparing subject vs. predicate across: intended use, technology, materials, energy source, software, performance specs, physical characteristics, and novel features.
For each parameter, state Same or Different with analysis. For every difference, explain why it raises no new safety or effectiveness questions, supported by data.
Split predicate: If using multiple predicates, justify. At least one must share the same intended use.
Present in order:
Each data set must link to a specific SE comparison point or IFU claim.
Required components (21 CFR Part 801):
IFU indications must exactly match submission indications.
Per 21 CFR 807.87(k). Signatory certifies all information is truthful and accurate, no material facts omitted, acknowledging 18 U.S.C. § 1001 penalties. Include printed name, title, signature, and date. Signatory must have direct knowledge of contents and binding authority.
Summary (21 CFR 807.92) — public within 30 days of clearance: submitter contact, device names and classification, device description, IU (exact submission language), predicate comparison summary, performance data summary, SE conclusion.
Statement (21 CFR 807.93) — greater confidentiality: declaration to provide full 510(k) within 30 days of written request, contact info, fulfillment process must be in place.
Key changes made:
development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.