agents/skills/execute-plan/SKILL.md
Work through a plan file task-by-task, checking off items as they complete
npx skillsauth add carterdea/dots execute-planInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Work through a plan file task-by-task, checking off items as they complete.
/execute-plan docs/my_feature_PLAN.md # Execute from a plan file /execute-plan # Look for a plan in conversation history /execute-plan docs/plan.md --commit-per-task # Override default commit cadence
If the plan has a ### File Map section, use it to front-load context:
On Sonnet or smaller models: use Explore subagents to read and validate the file map in parallel. Give each subagent a batch of files (e.g., "Read these 3 files and confirm the line ranges match the descriptions"). Collect results before proceeding.
This step gives you most of the context you need before executing a single task.
## Open Questions for unchecked - [ ] itemssrc/db/"Auto-detect validation and tooling -- don't ask, just state:
package.json, pyproject.toml, Makefile, Cargo.toml, etc.bun test, pytest, cargo test, etc.)eslint, ruff, clippy, etc.)bun, uv, cargo, etc.)bun test for tests, eslint for lint, bun for dependencies."Default commit cadence: per-phase. Override with --commit-per-task or --commit-end-only.
State the plan upfront: "Committing per-phase. Starting at Phase 1, Task 1. 12 tasks across 3 phases."
Find the next unchecked - [ ] task under ## Implementation Plan and execute it. This includes failed QA items (- [ ] QA: with a > FAIL: annotation) -- treat the failure annotation as the task description, fix the underlying code, then remove the > FAIL: line but leave the QA item unchecked for /qa to re-verify.
For each task:
- [ ] becomes - [x]### - [x]git add . -- stage files individually)State assumptions instead of asking. User can interrupt if they disagree.
After checking off each task, add a nested QA: line describing how to verify the change in a browser or via API. This gives /qa concrete instructions to follow later.
User-facing changes -- add an unchecked QA item:
API/backend changes -- describe the request to verify:
Internal/non-user-facing changes -- no checkbox, just a note:
Keep QA notes brief -- one line, focused on what to do and what to expect. The /qa command will use these as its test instructions.
Simple failures -- handle autonomously:
Fix the issue, re-validate, and continue. If the fix doesn't work after one retry, escalate to catastrophic.
Catastrophic failures -- stop and report:
Stop execution, report what failed and why, and wait for user input before continuing. Suggest running /handoff if the user wants to continue in a new session.
When all tasks are checked off (or all tasks in a phase are checked off):
Gather git context:
git branch --show-current git worktree list
If unchecked - [ ] QA: items exist in the plan, output:
/qa <plan-file-path>
branch: <current-branch> worktree: <worktree-path> # omit if not in a worktree
If all QA items are already checked (or all were QA: N/A), output:
/pre-pr
branch: <current-branch> worktree: <worktree-path> # omit if not in a worktree
worktree line -- only include if the current directory is a git worktree (not the main working tree)git add .development
Ship a Trello ticket end to end on any web app (Vercel, Fly.io, or other host — no Shopify): pull the latest main, read the card including Figma links, implement the change in a worktree, run the project's own tests/lint/typecheck, run de-slop and code-simplifier and fold the worthwhile cleanups in, QA desktop and mobile on a local Portless preview URL, capture screenshots, open or update the GitHub PR, link the PR and Trello to each other, attach screenshots to both, comment on the card, and move it to review. Use this whenever the user points you at a Trello card or ticket for a code task and wants it delivered as a reviewable PR — phrases like 'do this Trello ticket', 'ship this card', 'pick up this ticket and open a PR', 'update the PR for this card', or names a card/list/board with a feature or bug to implement. This is the default Trello-to-PR workflow for non-Shopify projects; for Shopify theme work use shopify-trello-delivery instead.
tools
Install or upgrade a quality baseline for Shopify theme repos. Use this whenever the user asks to add Shopify theme linting, Biome, Theme Check, Playwright accessibility checks, Vitest, Vite build tooling, lefthook hooks, GitHub Actions CI, Shopify Lighthouse CI, Claude Code PR review workflows, or a context-efficient run_silent.sh setup across Shopify sites.
development
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
development
Ship Shopify theme work from a Trello ticket end to end: inspect the card including Figma links, implement the theme change, deploy or update the correct preview/dev theme, browser-QA desktop and mobile against Figma when available, create or update the GitHub PR, attach screenshots, comment on Trello, and move the card forward. Use this whenever the user mentions a Shopify theme task with a Trello card, Figma design/artboard, preview theme, Customizer, dev theme, PR handoff, Ready for Review/Testing, or asks to update an existing Shopify PR from a ticket.