skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/analysis/wrangling/text-mining-guide/SKILL.md
Apply NLP and text mining techniques to research text data
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research text-mining-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for applying natural language processing (NLP) and text mining techniques to research data. Covers text preprocessing, feature extraction, topic modeling, sentiment analysis, and named entity recognition for analyzing surveys, abstracts, social media, and document corpora.
import re
from collections import Counter
def preprocess_text(text: str, lowercase: bool = True,
remove_numbers: bool = False,
min_word_length: int = 2) -> list[str]:
"""
Preprocess text for NLP analysis.
Args:
text: Raw input text
lowercase: Convert to lowercase
remove_numbers: Remove numeric tokens
min_word_length: Minimum token length to keep
"""
if lowercase:
text = text.lower()
# Remove URLs
text = re.sub(r"http\S+|www\.\S+", "", text)
# Remove HTML tags
text = re.sub(r"<[^>]+>", "", text)
# Remove special characters (keep apostrophes for contractions)
text = re.sub(r"[^a-zA-Z0-9\s']", " ", text)
# Tokenize
tokens = text.split()
if remove_numbers:
tokens = [t for t in tokens if not t.isdigit()]
# Remove short tokens
tokens = [t for t in tokens if len(t) >= min_word_length]
return tokens
def remove_stopwords(tokens: list[str],
custom_stopwords: list[str] = None) -> list[str]:
"""
Remove stopwords from token list.
"""
# Minimal English stopwords (extend as needed)
default_stops = {
"the", "a", "an", "and", "or", "but", "in", "on", "at",
"to", "for", "of", "with", "by", "is", "was", "are", "were",
"be", "been", "being", "have", "has", "had", "do", "does",
"did", "will", "would", "could", "should", "may", "might",
"this", "that", "these", "those", "it", "its", "not", "no"
}
if custom_stopwords:
default_stops.update(custom_stopwords)
return [t for t in tokens if t not in default_stops]
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer
def build_tfidf_matrix(documents: list[str],
max_features: int = 5000) -> dict:
"""
Build a TF-IDF document-term matrix.
Args:
documents: List of document strings
max_features: Maximum vocabulary size
"""
vectorizer = TfidfVectorizer(
max_features=max_features,
stop_words="english",
min_df=2, # Appear in at least 2 documents
max_df=0.95, # Ignore terms in >95% of documents
ngram_range=(1, 2) # Unigrams and bigrams
)
tfidf_matrix = vectorizer.fit_transform(documents)
return {
"matrix_shape": tfidf_matrix.shape,
"vocabulary_size": len(vectorizer.vocabulary_),
"top_terms": sorted(
vectorizer.vocabulary_.items(),
key=lambda x: x[1]
)[:20],
"vectorizer": vectorizer,
"matrix": tfidf_matrix
}
from sklearn.decomposition import LatentDirichletAllocation
def run_topic_model(tfidf_matrix, vectorizer,
n_topics: int = 10) -> list[dict]:
"""
Run LDA topic modeling on a document-term matrix.
Args:
tfidf_matrix: Sparse TF-IDF matrix
vectorizer: Fitted TfidfVectorizer
n_topics: Number of topics to extract
"""
lda = LatentDirichletAllocation(
n_components=n_topics,
random_state=42,
max_iter=50,
learning_method="online"
)
lda.fit(tfidf_matrix)
feature_names = vectorizer.get_feature_names_out()
topics = []
for idx, topic_weights in enumerate(lda.components_):
top_indices = topic_weights.argsort()[-10:][::-1]
top_words = [feature_names[i] for i in top_indices]
topics.append({
"topic_id": idx,
"top_words": top_words,
"label": "Assign a human-readable label based on top words"
})
return topics
Methods for selecting k (number of topics):
- Coherence score: Higher is better (use gensim's CoherenceModel)
- Perplexity: Lower is better (but can overfit)
- Human judgment: Do topics make interpretive sense?
- Domain knowledge: Expected number of themes in the corpus
Practical advice:
- Start with k = 5, 10, 15, 20 and compare
- Examine top words for each k -- look for coherent themes
- If topics are too broad, increase k
- If topics overlap heavily, decrease k
def simple_sentiment(text: str, positive_words: set,
negative_words: set) -> dict:
"""
Basic lexicon-based sentiment scoring.
Args:
text: Input text
positive_words: Set of positive sentiment words
negative_words: Set of negative sentiment words
"""
tokens = text.lower().split()
pos_count = sum(1 for t in tokens if t in positive_words)
neg_count = sum(1 for t in tokens if t in negative_words)
total = len(tokens)
score = (pos_count - neg_count) / max(total, 1)
return {
"positive_count": pos_count,
"negative_count": neg_count,
"score": score,
"label": (
"positive" if score > 0.05
else "negative" if score < -0.05
else "neutral"
)
}
| Task | Method | Application | |------|--------|-------------| | Literature mapping | Topic modeling | Identify research themes in a corpus of abstracts | | Survey analysis | Thematic coding + sentiment | Analyze open-ended survey responses | | Social media analysis | NER + sentiment | Track public discourse on a topic | | Content analysis | Classification + keyword extraction | Code qualitative data at scale | | Bibliometrics | Co-word analysis | Map intellectual structure of a field |
Always validate text mining results against human judgment. Report preprocessing steps, parameter choices (e.g., number of topics, min_df, max_df), and model evaluation metrics. For topic models, include the top 10-15 words per topic and representative documents. For classification, report precision, recall, and F1 on a held-out test set. Acknowledge that automated text analysis supplements but does not replace close reading.
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.