brycewang-stanford/submit
skills/41-sticerd-eee-sewage-econometrics-check/skills/submit/SKILL.md
Final submission verification gate for the sewage-house-prices paper. Runs full paper excellence review, replication audit, enforces score gates, and generates cover letter draft and submission checklist. This skill should be used when asked to "submit", "prepare for submission", or "submission checklist".
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research submitInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 20, 2026, 5:01 AM154.2s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- submit
- description:
- Final submission verification gate for the sewage-house-prices paper. Runs full paper excellence review, replication audit, enforces score gates, and generates cover letter draft and submission checklist. This skill should be used when asked to "submit", "prepare for submission", or "submission checklist".
- argument-hint:
- [journal name (optional)]
- allowed-tools:
- ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Bash", "Agent"]
Submit
Final submission gate combining full verification, score enforcement, and submission checklist.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — target journal name (optional).
Workflow
Step 1: Pre-Flight Checks
- Verify manuscript exists at
docs/overleaf/_main.tex - Check for existing quality reports in
output/log/ - Verify analysis outputs exist in
output/tables/andoutput/figures/ - Check
Replication/directory exists (if not, flag for/data-deposit)
Step 2: Run Full Verification
If /paper-excellence hasn't been run recently (check report dates in output/log/):
- Run the full paper excellence review (econometrics, code, paper, bibliography)
Step 3: Run Replication Audit
If Replication/ exists:
- Run
/audit-replication Replication/
Step 4: Score Gate
Check against thresholds:
| Requirement | Threshold | Status | |-------------|-----------|--------| | Aggregate score | >= 90 | PASS/FAIL | | Econometrics component | >= 80 | PASS/FAIL | | Code component | >= 80 | PASS/FAIL | | Paper component | >= 80 | PASS/FAIL | | Replication (if exists) | >= 8/10 checks | PASS/FAIL |
If any requirement FAILS: List specific blocking issues and stop. Do not generate submission materials.
Step 5: Generate Submission Package
If all gates pass:
-
Cover letter draft (save to
output/log/cover_letter_[journal]_[date].tex):- Addressed to current editor
- 1 paragraph: what the paper does (sewage spill capitalisation using EDM data)
- 1 paragraph: why this journal (fit with environmental/housing economics)
- 1 paragraph: originality confirmation
- Suggested referees (3-5, from
/target-journalif available)
-
Final checklist (save to
output/log/submission_checklist_[date].md):# Submission Checklist: [Journal] ## Manuscript - [ ] Title page with affiliations and contact info - [ ] Abstract within word limit - [ ] JEL codes (2-3): Q53, R31, Q58 - [ ] Keywords: sewage spills, house prices, hedonic pricing, environmental disamenity, EDM - [ ] Journal formatting guidelines followed ## Data and Code - [ ] Replication package assembled - [ ] Data availability statement in manuscript - [ ] Restricted data flagged (Land Registry, Zoopla) ## Quality Gates - [ ] Aggregate score: XX/100 (>= 90 required) - [ ] All components >= 80 - [ ] No unresolved CRITICAL issues ## Submission - [ ] Upload manuscript PDF - [ ] Upload replication package (if required) - [ ] Upload cover letter - [ ] Submit via [portal]
Step 6: Present Results
# Submission Report
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Target Journal:** [name]
**Aggregate Score:** XX/100
## Gate Status: [PASS / FAIL]
| Component | Score | Threshold | Status |
|-----------|-------|-----------|--------|
| Aggregate | XX | >= 90 | ... |
| Econometrics | XX | >= 80 | ... |
| Code | XX | >= 80 | ... |
| Paper | XX | >= 80 | ... |
| Replication | X/10 | >= 8/10 | ... |
## Generated Materials
- Cover letter: output/log/cover_letter_*.tex
- Checklist: output/log/submission_checklist_*.md
## Remaining Steps (manual)
1. Review and customise cover letter
2. Upload to [submission portal]
3. Enter suggested referees
4. Submit
Principles
- This is the final gate. Score >= 90 with all components >= 80.
- If it fails, stop. List blocking issues. Don't generate submission materials for a failing paper.
- Cover letter is a draft. The user must review and customise before sending.
- Manual submission. This skill prepares materials but does NOT submit to journals.
- Be realistic. If the paper isn't ready, say so clearly.
Related Skills
brycewang-stanford/thematic-analysis
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/slr-prisma
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/running-placebo-analysis
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/running-causalpy-experiments
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026