brycewang-stanford/submit
skills/16-hsantanna88-clo-author/dot-claude/skills/submit/SKILL.md
Submission pipeline — journal targeting, replication package, audit, and final gate. Replaces /submit, /target-journal, /audit-replication, /data-deposit.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research submitInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 24, 2026, 8:34 PM0.4s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- submit
- description:
- Submission pipeline — journal targeting, replication package, audit, and final gate. Replaces /submit, /target-journal, /audit-replication, /data-deposit.
- argument-hint:
- [mode: target | package | audit | final] [journal name (optional)]
- allowed-tools:
- Read,Grep,Glob,Write,Bash,Task
Submit
Submission pipeline with four modes covering journal selection through final verification.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — mode keyword, optionally followed by journal name.
Modes
/submit target — Journal Targeting
Get ranked journal recommendations.
Agent: Orchestrator (journal selection function)
Considers: contribution fit, methodology fit, audience fit, recent publications, desk rejection risk. Consults .claude/references/domain-profile.md for journal tiers.
Output: Ranked list of 3 target journals with rationale.
Save to quality_reports/journal_recommendations_[date].md
/submit package — Build Replication Package
Assemble AEA-compliant replication package.
Agents: Coder + Verifier
Produces:
- Master script that runs all analyses end-to-end
- README with data sources, computational requirements, instructions
- Data documentation and codebook
- Organized file structure per AEA standards
Save to
paper/replication/
/submit audit — Audit Replication Package
Verify replication package completeness.
Agent: Verifier (submission mode — 10 checks)
Checks:
- Master script exists and runs
- All tables reproduce
- All figures reproduce
- README complete
- Data documentation present
- Numbered script order
- Dependencies listed
- Runtime documented
- Output paths match paper references
- No hardcoded paths
/submit final [journal] — Final Submission Gate
Full verification + score enforcement + submission checklist.
Workflow:
- Run comprehensive review if not done recently
- Run replication audit
- Check score gate: aggregate >= 95, all components >= 80
- If PASS: generate cover letter draft + submission checklist
- If FAIL: list blocking issues and stop
Principles
- Score >= 95 + all components >= 80. No exceptions.
- Don't skip verification. Even if reports exist, check they're recent.
- If it fails, stop. Don't generate materials for a failing paper.
- Cover letter is a draft. User must review before sending.
Related Skills
brycewang-stanford/thematic-analysis
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/slr-prisma
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/running-placebo-analysis
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/running-causalpy-experiments
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026