skills/09-meleantonio-awesome-econ-ai-stuff/_skills/data/stata-data-cleaning/SKILL.md
Clean and transform messy data in Stata with reproducible workflows
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research stata-data-cleaningInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
This skill helps economists clean, transform, and prepare datasets for analysis in Stata. It emphasizes reproducibility, proper documentation, and handling common data quality issues found in economic research.
Before generating code, ask the user:
Create a Stata do-file that:
assert statements to verify data integritylabel variable/*==============================================================================
Project: Economic Analysis Data Cleaning
Author: [Your Name]
Date: [Date]
Purpose: Clean raw survey data for regression analysis
Input: raw_survey_data.dta
Output: cleaned_analysis_data.dta
==============================================================================*/
* ============================================
* 1. SETUP
* ============================================
clear all
set more off
cap log close
log using "logs/data_cleaning_`c(current_date)'.log", replace
* Set working directory
cd "/path/to/project"
* Define globals for paths
global raw_data "data/raw"
global clean_data "data/clean"
global output "output"
* ============================================
* 2. LOAD AND INSPECT RAW DATA
* ============================================
use "${raw_data}/raw_survey_data.dta", clear
* Basic inspection
describe
summarize
codebook, compact
* Check for duplicates
duplicates report id_var
duplicates list id_var if _dup > 0
* ============================================
* 3. VARIABLE CLEANING
* ============================================
* --- Rename variables for clarity ---
rename q1 age
rename q2 income_reported
rename q3 education_level
* --- Clean numeric variables ---
* Replace missing value codes with .
mvdecode age income_reported, mv(-99 -88 -77)
* Cap outliers at 99th percentile
qui sum income_reported, detail
replace income_reported = r(p99) if income_reported > r(p99) & !mi(income_reported)
* --- Clean string variables ---
* Standardize state names
replace state = upper(trim(state))
replace state = "NEW YORK" if inlist(state, "NY", "N.Y.", "N Y")
* --- Create categorical variables ---
gen education_cat = .
replace education_cat = 1 if education_level < 12
replace education_cat = 2 if education_level == 12
replace education_cat = 3 if education_level > 12 & education_level <= 16
replace education_cat = 4 if education_level > 16 & !mi(education_level)
label define edu_lbl 1 "Less than HS" 2 "High School" 3 "College" 4 "Graduate"
label values education_cat edu_lbl
* ============================================
* 4. HANDLE MISSING DATA
* ============================================
* Create missing indicator variables
gen mi_income = mi(income_reported)
* Document missingness
tab mi_income
* Count complete cases
egen complete_case = rownonmiss(age income_reported education_cat)
tab complete_case
* ============================================
* 5. CREATE DERIVED VARIABLES
* ============================================
* Age groups
gen age_group = .
replace age_group = 1 if age >= 18 & age < 30
replace age_group = 2 if age >= 30 & age < 50
replace age_group = 3 if age >= 50 & age < 65
replace age_group = 4 if age >= 65 & !mi(age)
label define age_lbl 1 "18-29" 2 "30-49" 3 "50-64" 4 "65+"
label values age_group age_lbl
* Log income
gen log_income = ln(income_reported + 1)
* ============================================
* 6. DATA VALIDATION
* ============================================
* Assert expected ranges
assert age >= 18 & age <= 120 if !mi(age)
assert income_reported >= 0 if !mi(income_reported)
* Check variable types
assert !mi(id_var)
isid id_var // Verify unique identifier
* ============================================
* 7. LABEL VARIABLES
* ============================================
label variable age "Age in years"
label variable income_reported "Annual income (USD)"
label variable education_cat "Education category"
label variable log_income "Log of annual income"
label variable mi_income "Missing income indicator"
* ============================================
* 8. FINAL CHECKS AND SAVE
* ============================================
* Keep relevant variables
keep id_var age age_group income_reported log_income ///
education_cat mi_income state year
* Order variables logically
order id_var year state age age_group income_reported ///
log_income education_cat mi_income
* Compress to minimize file size
compress
* Save cleaned data
save "${clean_data}/cleaned_analysis_data.dta", replace
* Create codebook
codebook, compact
* Close log
log close
* ============================================
* END OF FILE
* ============================================
ssc install unique // For unique value checking
ssc install mdesc // For missing data patterns
ssc install labutil // For label manipulation
clear all to ensure clean environmentassert statements to catch data errors earlydevelopment
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.