skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/social-science/social-research-methods/SKILL.md
Core methods for empirical social science research including surveys and expe...
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research social-research-methodsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A comprehensive skill for designing and conducting empirical social science research. Covers survey methodology, experimental design, qualitative methods, and mixed-methods approaches used across sociology, political science, and psychology.
Research Question Type -> Recommended Design
"What is the prevalence of X?" -> Cross-sectional survey
"Does X cause Y?" -> Randomized experiment or quasi-experiment
"How does X develop over time?" -> Longitudinal panel study
"What does X mean to participants?" -> Qualitative (interviews, ethnography)
"How much of Y is explained by X?" -> Correlational / regression study
"Does the effect hold across contexts?" -> Comparative / cross-national study
def operationalize_construct(construct: str, dimensions: list[dict]) -> dict:
"""
Create an operationalization plan for a theoretical construct.
Args:
construct: Name of the abstract concept
dimensions: List of dicts with 'name', 'indicators', 'measurement_level'
"""
plan = {
'construct': construct,
'dimensions': [],
'total_items': 0
}
for dim in dimensions:
items = []
for indicator in dim['indicators']:
items.append({
'indicator': indicator,
'measurement': dim['measurement_level'],
'source': dim.get('data_source', 'self-report survey')
})
plan['dimensions'].append({
'name': dim['name'],
'items': items,
'n_items': len(items)
})
plan['total_items'] += len(items)
return plan
# Example: operationalize "social capital"
social_capital = operationalize_construct(
construct="Social Capital",
dimensions=[
{
'name': 'bonding_capital',
'indicators': ['close_friends_count', 'family_support_scale', 'trust_in_neighbors'],
'measurement_level': 'ordinal (Likert 1-5)'
},
{
'name': 'bridging_capital',
'indicators': ['diverse_network_size', 'weak_ties_count', 'civic_participation'],
'measurement_level': 'ratio'
}
]
)
| Method | Description | When to Use | |--------|------------|------------| | Simple random | Every unit has equal probability | Small, accessible populations | | Stratified | Divide into strata, sample within each | Need representation of subgroups | | Cluster | Sample groups, then individuals within | Geographically dispersed populations | | Quota | Non-probability; fill demographic quotas | Exploratory research, tight budgets | | Snowball | Participants recruit others | Hard-to-reach populations |
import math
def sample_size_proportion(p: float = 0.5, margin_error: float = 0.05,
confidence: float = 0.95, population: int = None) -> int:
"""
Calculate required sample size for estimating a proportion.
Args:
p: Expected proportion (use 0.5 for maximum variance)
margin_error: Desired margin of error
confidence: Confidence level
population: Finite population size (optional)
"""
z_scores = {0.90: 1.645, 0.95: 1.96, 0.99: 2.576}
z = z_scores.get(confidence, 1.96)
n = (z**2 * p * (1 - p)) / margin_error**2
# Finite population correction
if population:
n = n / (1 + (n - 1) / population)
return math.ceil(n)
print(sample_size_proportion(p=0.5, margin_error=0.03, confidence=0.95))
# Result: 1068
Between-subjects:
+ No carryover effects
+ Simpler analysis
- Requires more participants
- Individual differences add noise
Within-subjects:
+ More statistical power
+ Fewer participants needed
- Carryover/order effects
- Demand characteristics
Solution: Counterbalance condition order (Latin square)
Always use computer-generated random assignment. Block randomization ensures balanced groups. Include manipulation checks to verify that the independent variable was perceived as intended.
# Standard analysis pipeline for survey data
import pandas as pd
from scipy import stats
def analyze_survey(df: pd.DataFrame, iv: str, dv: str,
covariates: list[str] = None) -> dict:
"""Run standard analytical checks on survey data."""
results = {}
# 1. Descriptive statistics
results['descriptives'] = df[[iv, dv]].describe().to_dict()
# 2. Reliability (if scale items provided)
# Compute Cronbach's alpha for multi-item scales
# 3. Bivariate test
if df[iv].nunique() == 2:
groups = [group[dv].dropna() for _, group in df.groupby(iv)]
t_stat, p_val = stats.ttest_ind(*groups)
d = (groups[0].mean() - groups[1].mean()) / df[dv].std() # Cohen's d
results['test'] = {'type': 't-test', 't': t_stat, 'p': p_val, 'cohens_d': d}
else:
# Correlation for continuous IV
r, p = stats.pearsonr(df[iv].dropna(), df[dv].dropna())
results['test'] = {'type': 'correlation', 'r': r, 'p': p}
return results
All social science research with human participants requires Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee approval. Obtain informed consent, ensure confidentiality, minimize harm, and provide debriefing for deception studies. Follow APA or ASA ethical guidelines as applicable to your discipline.
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.