skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/methodology/slr-automation-guide/SKILL.md
Tools and pipelines for automating systematic literature reviews
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research slr-automation-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) are rigorous, reproducible surveys of research evidence following protocols like PRISMA and Cochrane. This guide covers tools that automate the most time-consuming steps — deduplication, title/abstract screening, full-text assessment, and data extraction — using active learning, NLP, and AI agents. Key tools include ASReview, Rayyan, and custom pipelines.
Protocol Definition (PICO, inclusion/exclusion criteria)
↓
Database Search (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science)
↓
Deduplication (ASReview, Rayyan, or custom)
↓
Title/Abstract Screening (AI-assisted prioritization)
↓
Full-text Assessment (relevance + quality)
↓
Data Extraction (structured tables)
↓
Quality Assessment (risk of bias)
↓
Synthesis + PRISMA Report
# Install ASReview
pip install asreview
# Launch web interface
asreview lab
# CLI screening
asreview simulate benchmark:van_de_Schoot_2017 \
-m nb -e tfidf \
--n_prior_included 5 --n_prior_excluded 5 \
-o results/simulation.asreview
import asreview
from asreview import ASReviewData, ReviewSimulate
# Load dataset (RIS, CSV, or Excel)
data = ASReviewData.from_file("search_results.ris")
print(f"Records: {len(data)}")
# Active learning simulation
sim = ReviewSimulate(
data,
model="nb", # Naive Bayes classifier
feature_extraction="tfidf",
query_strategy="max", # Show most likely relevant first
n_prior_included=5,
n_prior_excluded=5,
)
sim.review()
# Results: screening order optimized by relevance
print(f"Work saved: {sim.work_saved():.1%}")
# Typically 80-95% of irrelevant papers screened out early
# ASReview deduplication
from asreview.data import ASReviewData
# Merge results from multiple databases
datasets = [
ASReviewData.from_file("pubmed_results.ris"),
ASReviewData.from_file("scopus_results.ris"),
ASReviewData.from_file("wos_results.ris"),
]
merged = ASReviewData.from_dataframe(
pd.concat([d.df for d in datasets])
)
print(f"Before dedup: {len(merged)}")
# Fuzzy matching on title + DOI
deduplicated = merged.deduplicate()
print(f"After dedup: {len(deduplicated)}")
# Custom LLM screening pipeline
from slr_tools import LLMScreener
screener = LLMScreener(
llm_provider="anthropic",
criteria={
"population": "Adults with type 2 diabetes",
"intervention": "SGLT2 inhibitors",
"outcomes": "Cardiovascular events",
"study_types": ["RCT", "cohort", "meta-analysis"],
"exclusions": ["animal studies", "in vitro", "pediatric"],
},
)
# Screen abstracts
results = screener.screen_batch(
records=search_results,
fields=["title", "abstract"],
threshold=0.5, # Include if P(relevant) > 0.5
)
for r in results:
print(f"[{'INCLUDE' if r.include else 'EXCLUDE'}] "
f"(p={r.confidence:.2f}) {r.title[:60]}...")
print(f" Reason: {r.reason}")
# Structured data extraction from full-text papers
from slr_tools import DataExtractor
extractor = DataExtractor(
llm_provider="anthropic",
schema={
"study_design": "str",
"sample_size": "int",
"population_description": "str",
"intervention_details": "str",
"primary_outcome": "str",
"effect_size": "float",
"confidence_interval": "str",
"p_value": "float",
"follow_up_duration": "str",
"risk_of_bias": "str",
},
)
# Extract from PDF
extracted = extractor.extract("paper.pdf")
print(extracted.to_dict())
# Batch extraction
results_df = extractor.extract_batch("fulltext_papers/")
results_df.to_csv("extraction_table.csv")
# Generate PRISMA 2020 flow diagram
from slr_tools import PRISMAFlow
flow = PRISMAFlow(
identification={
"databases": {"PubMed": 1200, "Scopus": 890, "WoS": 650},
"other_sources": {"citation_search": 45},
},
screening={
"after_dedup": 1850,
"excluded_title_abstract": 1620,
"sought_fulltext": 230,
"not_retrieved": 12,
},
included={
"assessed_fulltext": 218,
"excluded_fulltext": {
"wrong_population": 45,
"wrong_intervention": 32,
"wrong_outcome": 28,
"wrong_study_type": 15,
},
"final_included": 98,
},
)
flow.save_svg("prisma_flow.svg")
flow.save_latex("prisma_flow.tex")
# Risk of Bias assessment (Cochrane RoB 2)
from slr_tools import RiskOfBias
rob = RiskOfBias(tool="rob2") # or "robins_i" for non-RCTs
assessment = rob.assess(
paper="paper.pdf",
domains=[
"randomization_process",
"deviations_from_intervention",
"missing_outcome_data",
"outcome_measurement",
"selection_of_reported_result",
],
)
print(f"Overall: {assessment.overall_judgment}")
for domain, judgment in assessment.domain_judgments.items():
print(f" {domain}: {judgment}")
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.