skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/methodology/slr-automation-guide/SKILL.md
Tools and pipelines for automating systematic literature reviews
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research slr-automation-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) are rigorous, reproducible surveys of research evidence following protocols like PRISMA and Cochrane. This guide covers tools that automate the most time-consuming steps — deduplication, title/abstract screening, full-text assessment, and data extraction — using active learning, NLP, and AI agents. Key tools include ASReview, Rayyan, and custom pipelines.
Protocol Definition (PICO, inclusion/exclusion criteria)
↓
Database Search (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science)
↓
Deduplication (ASReview, Rayyan, or custom)
↓
Title/Abstract Screening (AI-assisted prioritization)
↓
Full-text Assessment (relevance + quality)
↓
Data Extraction (structured tables)
↓
Quality Assessment (risk of bias)
↓
Synthesis + PRISMA Report
# Install ASReview
pip install asreview
# Launch web interface
asreview lab
# CLI screening
asreview simulate benchmark:van_de_Schoot_2017 \
-m nb -e tfidf \
--n_prior_included 5 --n_prior_excluded 5 \
-o results/simulation.asreview
import asreview
from asreview import ASReviewData, ReviewSimulate
# Load dataset (RIS, CSV, or Excel)
data = ASReviewData.from_file("search_results.ris")
print(f"Records: {len(data)}")
# Active learning simulation
sim = ReviewSimulate(
data,
model="nb", # Naive Bayes classifier
feature_extraction="tfidf",
query_strategy="max", # Show most likely relevant first
n_prior_included=5,
n_prior_excluded=5,
)
sim.review()
# Results: screening order optimized by relevance
print(f"Work saved: {sim.work_saved():.1%}")
# Typically 80-95% of irrelevant papers screened out early
# ASReview deduplication
from asreview.data import ASReviewData
# Merge results from multiple databases
datasets = [
ASReviewData.from_file("pubmed_results.ris"),
ASReviewData.from_file("scopus_results.ris"),
ASReviewData.from_file("wos_results.ris"),
]
merged = ASReviewData.from_dataframe(
pd.concat([d.df for d in datasets])
)
print(f"Before dedup: {len(merged)}")
# Fuzzy matching on title + DOI
deduplicated = merged.deduplicate()
print(f"After dedup: {len(deduplicated)}")
# Custom LLM screening pipeline
from slr_tools import LLMScreener
screener = LLMScreener(
llm_provider="anthropic",
criteria={
"population": "Adults with type 2 diabetes",
"intervention": "SGLT2 inhibitors",
"outcomes": "Cardiovascular events",
"study_types": ["RCT", "cohort", "meta-analysis"],
"exclusions": ["animal studies", "in vitro", "pediatric"],
},
)
# Screen abstracts
results = screener.screen_batch(
records=search_results,
fields=["title", "abstract"],
threshold=0.5, # Include if P(relevant) > 0.5
)
for r in results:
print(f"[{'INCLUDE' if r.include else 'EXCLUDE'}] "
f"(p={r.confidence:.2f}) {r.title[:60]}...")
print(f" Reason: {r.reason}")
# Structured data extraction from full-text papers
from slr_tools import DataExtractor
extractor = DataExtractor(
llm_provider="anthropic",
schema={
"study_design": "str",
"sample_size": "int",
"population_description": "str",
"intervention_details": "str",
"primary_outcome": "str",
"effect_size": "float",
"confidence_interval": "str",
"p_value": "float",
"follow_up_duration": "str",
"risk_of_bias": "str",
},
)
# Extract from PDF
extracted = extractor.extract("paper.pdf")
print(extracted.to_dict())
# Batch extraction
results_df = extractor.extract_batch("fulltext_papers/")
results_df.to_csv("extraction_table.csv")
# Generate PRISMA 2020 flow diagram
from slr_tools import PRISMAFlow
flow = PRISMAFlow(
identification={
"databases": {"PubMed": 1200, "Scopus": 890, "WoS": 650},
"other_sources": {"citation_search": 45},
},
screening={
"after_dedup": 1850,
"excluded_title_abstract": 1620,
"sought_fulltext": 230,
"not_retrieved": 12,
},
included={
"assessed_fulltext": 218,
"excluded_fulltext": {
"wrong_population": 45,
"wrong_intervention": 32,
"wrong_outcome": 28,
"wrong_study_type": 15,
},
"final_included": 98,
},
)
flow.save_svg("prisma_flow.svg")
flow.save_latex("prisma_flow.tex")
# Risk of Bias assessment (Cochrane RoB 2)
from slr_tools import RiskOfBias
rob = RiskOfBias(tool="rob2") # or "robins_i" for non-RCTs
assessment = rob.assess(
paper="paper.pdf",
domains=[
"randomization_process",
"deviations_from_intervention",
"missing_outcome_data",
"outcome_measurement",
"selection_of_reported_result",
],
)
print(f"Overall: {assessment.overall_judgment}")
for domain, judgment in assessment.domain_judgments.items():
print(f" {domain}: {judgment}")
tools
Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review".
tools
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".
tools
Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review".
tools
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".