skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/methodology/slr-automation-guide/SKILL.md
Tools and pipelines for automating systematic literature reviews
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research slr-automation-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) are rigorous, reproducible surveys of research evidence following protocols like PRISMA and Cochrane. This guide covers tools that automate the most time-consuming steps — deduplication, title/abstract screening, full-text assessment, and data extraction — using active learning, NLP, and AI agents. Key tools include ASReview, Rayyan, and custom pipelines.
Protocol Definition (PICO, inclusion/exclusion criteria)
↓
Database Search (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science)
↓
Deduplication (ASReview, Rayyan, or custom)
↓
Title/Abstract Screening (AI-assisted prioritization)
↓
Full-text Assessment (relevance + quality)
↓
Data Extraction (structured tables)
↓
Quality Assessment (risk of bias)
↓
Synthesis + PRISMA Report
# Install ASReview
pip install asreview
# Launch web interface
asreview lab
# CLI screening
asreview simulate benchmark:van_de_Schoot_2017 \
-m nb -e tfidf \
--n_prior_included 5 --n_prior_excluded 5 \
-o results/simulation.asreview
import asreview
from asreview import ASReviewData, ReviewSimulate
# Load dataset (RIS, CSV, or Excel)
data = ASReviewData.from_file("search_results.ris")
print(f"Records: {len(data)}")
# Active learning simulation
sim = ReviewSimulate(
data,
model="nb", # Naive Bayes classifier
feature_extraction="tfidf",
query_strategy="max", # Show most likely relevant first
n_prior_included=5,
n_prior_excluded=5,
)
sim.review()
# Results: screening order optimized by relevance
print(f"Work saved: {sim.work_saved():.1%}")
# Typically 80-95% of irrelevant papers screened out early
# ASReview deduplication
from asreview.data import ASReviewData
# Merge results from multiple databases
datasets = [
ASReviewData.from_file("pubmed_results.ris"),
ASReviewData.from_file("scopus_results.ris"),
ASReviewData.from_file("wos_results.ris"),
]
merged = ASReviewData.from_dataframe(
pd.concat([d.df for d in datasets])
)
print(f"Before dedup: {len(merged)}")
# Fuzzy matching on title + DOI
deduplicated = merged.deduplicate()
print(f"After dedup: {len(deduplicated)}")
# Custom LLM screening pipeline
from slr_tools import LLMScreener
screener = LLMScreener(
llm_provider="anthropic",
criteria={
"population": "Adults with type 2 diabetes",
"intervention": "SGLT2 inhibitors",
"outcomes": "Cardiovascular events",
"study_types": ["RCT", "cohort", "meta-analysis"],
"exclusions": ["animal studies", "in vitro", "pediatric"],
},
)
# Screen abstracts
results = screener.screen_batch(
records=search_results,
fields=["title", "abstract"],
threshold=0.5, # Include if P(relevant) > 0.5
)
for r in results:
print(f"[{'INCLUDE' if r.include else 'EXCLUDE'}] "
f"(p={r.confidence:.2f}) {r.title[:60]}...")
print(f" Reason: {r.reason}")
# Structured data extraction from full-text papers
from slr_tools import DataExtractor
extractor = DataExtractor(
llm_provider="anthropic",
schema={
"study_design": "str",
"sample_size": "int",
"population_description": "str",
"intervention_details": "str",
"primary_outcome": "str",
"effect_size": "float",
"confidence_interval": "str",
"p_value": "float",
"follow_up_duration": "str",
"risk_of_bias": "str",
},
)
# Extract from PDF
extracted = extractor.extract("paper.pdf")
print(extracted.to_dict())
# Batch extraction
results_df = extractor.extract_batch("fulltext_papers/")
results_df.to_csv("extraction_table.csv")
# Generate PRISMA 2020 flow diagram
from slr_tools import PRISMAFlow
flow = PRISMAFlow(
identification={
"databases": {"PubMed": 1200, "Scopus": 890, "WoS": 650},
"other_sources": {"citation_search": 45},
},
screening={
"after_dedup": 1850,
"excluded_title_abstract": 1620,
"sought_fulltext": 230,
"not_retrieved": 12,
},
included={
"assessed_fulltext": 218,
"excluded_fulltext": {
"wrong_population": 45,
"wrong_intervention": 32,
"wrong_outcome": 28,
"wrong_study_type": 15,
},
"final_included": 98,
},
)
flow.save_svg("prisma_flow.svg")
flow.save_latex("prisma_flow.tex")
# Risk of Bias assessment (Cochrane RoB 2)
from slr_tools import RiskOfBias
rob = RiskOfBias(tool="rob2") # or "robins_i" for non-RCTs
assessment = rob.assess(
paper="paper.pdf",
domains=[
"randomization_process",
"deviations_from_intervention",
"missing_outcome_data",
"outcome_measurement",
"selection_of_reported_result",
],
)
print(f"Overall: {assessment.overall_judgment}")
for domain, judgment in assessment.domain_judgments.items():
print(f" {domain}: {judgment}")
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.