skills/05-kthorn-research-superpower/research/searching-literature/SKILL.md
<!-- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ 本文件为开源 Skill 原始文档,收录仅供学习与研究参考 ║ ║ CoPaper.AI 收集整理 | https://copaper.ai ║ ╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝ 来源仓库: https://github.com/kthorn/research-superpower 项目名称: research-superpower 开源协议: MIT License 收录日期: 2026-04-02 声明: 本文件版权归原作者所有。此处收录旨在为社会科学实证研究者 提供 AI Agent Skills 的集中参考。如有侵权,请联系删除。 --> --- name: Searching Scientific Literature description:
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research skills/05-kthorn-research-superpower/research/searching-literatureInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Search PubMed for scientific literature using optimized queries. Extract metadata and prepare papers for relevance evaluation.
Core principle: Cast a wide enough net to find relevant papers, but use targeted keywords to keep results manageable.
Use this skill when:
Extract:
Boolean operators:
Example queries:
"BTK inhibitor"[Title/Abstract] AND selectivity[Title/Abstract]
("kinase inhibitor" OR "protein kinase") AND (selectivity OR "off-target")
"ibrutinib"[Title/Abstract] AND ("IC50" OR "inhibitory concentration")
Field tags:
[Title/Abstract] - search title and abstract only[Title] - title only (more precise)[Author] - specific author[Journal] - specific journal[Date] - date rangeAPI endpoint:
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?\
db=pubmed&\
term=YOUR_QUERY&\
retmax=100&\
retmode=json&\
sort=relevance
Parameters:
db=pubmed - search PubMed databaseterm= - your query (URL encode spaces and special chars)retmax=100 - max results (start with 100)retmode=json - return JSONsort=relevance - most relevant first (or pub_date for newest)Example bash:
curl "https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?db=pubmed&term=BTK+inhibitor+selectivity&retmax=100&retmode=json&sort=relevance"
Response format:
{
"esearchresult": {
"count": "156",
"retmax": "100",
"idlist": ["12345678", "87654321", ...]
}
}
API endpoint:
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esummary.fcgi?\
db=pubmed&\
id=12345678,87654321&\
retmode=json
Extract from response:
articleids)Getting DOI from PMID:
"articleids": [
{"idtype": "pubmed", "value": "12345678"},
{"idtype": "doi", "value": "10.1234/example.2023"}
]
If DOI missing:
Create list of paper objects:
[
{
"pmid": "12345678",
"doi": "10.1234/example.2023",
"title": "Selective BTK inhibitors for autoimmune diseases",
"authors": ["Smith J", "Doe A", "Johnson B"],
"journal": "Nature Chemical Biology",
"year": "2023",
"abstract": "We developed a series of...",
"source": "pubmed_search"
}
]
Rate limits (CRITICAL - shared across all processes/subagents):
delay_seconds = (num_parallel / rate_limit) + safety_marginEmpty results:
Too many results (>500):
After search completes:
initial-search-results.jsonevaluating-paper-relevance skillpapers-reviewed.json (use DOI as key, fallback to PMID)| Task | Command |
|------|---------|
| Search PubMed | curl "https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?db=pubmed&term=QUERY&retmax=100&retmode=json" |
| Get metadata | curl "https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esummary.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=PMID1,PMID2&retmode=json" |
| URL encode query | Replace spaces with +, special chars with %XX |
| Narrow results | Use AND, add field tags, more specific terms |
| Broaden results | Use OR, remove field tags, add synonyms |
Too narrow: Only 5 results → Use OR, remove constraints Too broad: 5000 results → Add AND terms, use field tags Missing abstracts: Use efetch instead of esummary for full abstract text DOI not found: Many older papers lack DOI - use PMID as fallback Rate limiting: Add 500ms delays (single agent) or longer (parallel subagents sharing rate limit)
After completing search:
skills/research/evaluating-paper-relevancedevelopment
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.