brycewang-stanford/revise
skills/16-hsantanna88-clo-author/dot-claude/skills/revise/SKILL.md
R&R cycle — classify referee comments and route to appropriate agents. Replaces /respond-to-referee.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research reviseInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 24, 2026, 8:34 PM0.4s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- revise
- description:
- R&R cycle — classify referee comments and route to appropriate agents. Replaces /respond-to-referee.
- argument-hint:
- [referee-report file path] [paper path (optional)]
- allowed-tools:
- Read,Grep,Glob,Write,Edit,Task
Revise
Structure point-by-point referee responses with classification, agent routing per revision protocol, and diplomatic drafting.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — path to referee report file(s), optionally followed by paper path.
Workflow
Step 1: Parse Inputs
- Read referee report(s) from
$ARGUMENTS - Read the paper (paper/main.tex or specified path)
- Read revision protocol from rules
- Read existing scripts to know what analyses already exist
Step 2: Classify Every Comment
| Class | Routing | Action | |-------|---------|--------| | NEW ANALYSIS | → Coder agent | Flag for user, create analysis task | | CLARIFICATION | → Writer agent | Draft rewritten section | | REWRITE | → Writer agent | Draft structural revision | | DISAGREE | → User (mandatory) | Draft diplomatic pushback, flag for review | | MINOR | → Writer agent | Draft fix directly |
Step 3: Build Tracking Document
Save to quality_reports/referee_response_tracker.md with:
- Summary counts per referee
- Action items by priority (HIGH: new analysis, MEDIUM: clarification, FLAGGED: disagreements, LOW: minor)
Step 4: Dispatch Agents
- CLARIFICATION/REWRITE → dispatch Writer with specific instructions
- NEW ANALYSIS → flag for user approval before dispatching Coder
- DISAGREE → draft diplomatic response, flag prominently for user
Step 5: Draft Response Letter
Generate LaTeX response letter with:
- Summary of major changes
- Point-by-point responses with exact referee quotes
- Color-coded responses
- Page/section references for each change
Step 6: Diplomatic Disagreement Protocol
When DISAGREE: open with acknowledgment, provide evidence, offer partial concession, NEVER say "the referee is wrong." FLAG for user review.
Step 7: Save Outputs
- Tracker:
quality_reports/referee_response_tracker.md - Response letter:
quality_reports/referee_response_[journal]_[date].tex - Revised sections:
paper/sections/(for CLARIFICATION/REWRITE items)
Principles
- The response letter is the user's voice. Match their tone.
- Never fabricate results. Mark NEW ANALYSIS items as TBD.
- Flag all DISAGREE items. These need human judgment.
- Track everything. Every comment appears in both tracker and response letter.
Related Skills
brycewang-stanford/auto-review-loop-minimax
tools
Community
Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review".
3,665SKILL.mdUpdated May 26, 2026
brycewang-stanford/auto-review-loop-llm
tools
Community
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".
3,665SKILL.mdUpdated May 26, 2026
brycewang-stanford/auto-review-loop-minimax
tools
Community
Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review".
3,665SKILL.mdUpdated May 20, 2026
brycewang-stanford/auto-review-loop-llm
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".
3,665SKILL.mdUpdated May 20, 2026