skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/automation/rd-agent-guide/SKILL.md
Microsoft AI-driven R&D agent for automated data and model development
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research rd-agent-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
RD-Agent is an open-source AI-powered research and development automation framework developed by Microsoft Research, with over 12,000 stars on GitHub. It automates key steps in the R&D lifecycle -- including hypothesis generation, experiment design, code implementation, and result analysis -- enabling researchers and data scientists to accelerate their development cycles significantly.
The framework implements a closed-loop R&D automation pipeline where an AI agent iteratively proposes hypotheses, implements experiments, evaluates results, and refines its approach based on feedback. This mirrors the scientific method but operates at machine speed, allowing researchers to explore a much larger space of ideas and configurations than would be feasible manually.
RD-Agent is particularly valuable for researchers working in quantitative finance, data science, and machine learning, where the development process involves iterating on feature engineering, model architectures, and hyperparameter configurations. The framework has demonstrated the ability to autonomously develop competitive machine learning models and trading strategies, achieving results comparable to experienced human practitioners.
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/microsoft/RD-Agent.git
cd RD-Agent
# Install dependencies
pip install -e .
# Or install from PyPI
pip install rdagent
# LLM configuration (required)
export OPENAI_API_KEY=$OPENAI_API_KEY
export CHAT_MODEL=gpt-4o
# Or use Azure OpenAI
export AZURE_OPENAI_API_KEY=$AZURE_OPENAI_API_KEY
export AZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINT=$AZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINT
export AZURE_OPENAI_DEPLOYMENT=$AZURE_OPENAI_DEPLOYMENT
# Docker is required for sandboxed code execution
# Ensure Docker is installed and running
docker --version
RD-Agent uses Docker containers to execute generated code safely, ensuring that automatically generated experiments cannot affect the host system. This sandboxed execution is critical for an autonomous agent that writes and runs arbitrary code.
RD-Agent implements a continuous improvement loop with four phases:
from rdagent.core.runner import RDRunner
from rdagent.scenarios.data_science import DataScienceScenario
# Define the research scenario
scenario = DataScienceScenario(
task="tabular_classification",
dataset_path="path/to/dataset.csv",
target_column="label",
metric="auc",
)
# Create and run the R&D agent
runner = RDRunner(
scenario=scenario,
max_iterations=50,
llm_model="gpt-4o",
)
# Start the autonomous R&D loop
results = runner.run()
# Review the best solution found
print(f"Best metric: {results.best_score}")
print(f"Iterations: {results.total_iterations}")
print(f"Solutions explored: {results.num_solutions}")
RD-Agent supports multiple R&D scenarios out of the box:
Automatically engineer features, select models, and tune hyperparameters for tabular data tasks:
from rdagent.scenarios.data_science import DataScienceScenario
scenario = DataScienceScenario(
task="tabular_regression",
dataset_path="data/housing.csv",
target_column="price",
metric="rmse",
time_budget_hours=4,
)
Develop and backtest trading factors and strategies:
from rdagent.scenarios.qlib import QlibScenario
scenario = QlibScenario(
market="csi300",
task="alpha_factor_mining",
backtest_start="2020-01-01",
backtest_end="2024-12-31",
metric="information_coefficient",
)
Iterate on model architectures and training procedures:
from rdagent.scenarios.model_dev import ModelDevScenario
scenario = ModelDevScenario(
task="image_classification",
base_model="resnet50",
dataset="cifar100",
optimization_target="accuracy",
)
RD-Agent maintains detailed logs of all experiments, enabling post-hoc analysis of the R&D process:
# Access experiment history
for experiment in results.history:
print(f"Iteration {experiment.iteration}:")
print(f" Hypothesis: {experiment.hypothesis}")
print(f" Changes: {experiment.code_changes}")
print(f" Metric: {experiment.score}")
print(f" Analysis: {experiment.feedback}")
Define custom evaluation metrics for domain-specific research:
from rdagent.core.evaluation import EvaluationFunction
class CustomMetric(EvaluationFunction):
def evaluate(self, predictions, ground_truth, **kwargs):
# Your custom metric computation
score = compute_domain_specific_metric(predictions, ground_truth)
return {
"primary_metric": score,
"secondary_metrics": {
"precision": compute_precision(predictions, ground_truth),
"recall": compute_recall(predictions, ground_truth),
}
}
scenario = DataScienceScenario(
evaluation_function=CustomMetric(),
# ... other config
)
Guide the agent with human feedback at key decision points:
runner = RDRunner(
scenario=scenario,
human_in_the_loop=True,
review_frequency=5, # Review every 5 iterations
)
# The agent will pause for human review at specified intervals
# You can approve, reject, or modify proposed experiments
Use RD-Agent to systematically explore which components contribute most to model performance:
# Define ablation study
ablation_config = {
"base_model": "your_full_model",
"components_to_ablate": [
"attention_mechanism",
"residual_connections",
"layer_normalization",
"data_augmentation",
],
"metric": "accuracy",
"num_seeds": 5, # Run each configuration with 5 seeds
}
Let the agent discover and implement novel features for your dataset:
scenario = DataScienceScenario(
task="feature_engineering",
dataset_path="data/research_data.csv",
existing_features=["feature_a", "feature_b", "feature_c"],
target="outcome",
max_new_features=20,
)
Every experiment run by RD-Agent is fully reproducible. The framework saves the complete experiment specification including code, data transformations, random seeds, and environment details, enabling other researchers to reproduce and build upon the results.
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.