skills/55-ab604-claude-code-r-skills/skills/r-bayes/SKILL.md
Patterns for Bayesian inference in R using brms, including multilevel models, DAG validation, and marginal effects. Use when performing Bayesian analysis.
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research r-bayesInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
library(brms)
library(cmdstanr)
library(dagitty)
library(ggdag)
library(marginaleffects)
library(tidybayes)
library(bayesplot)
Prior to causal inference, create and validate DAGs with dagitty and ggdag.
dag <- dagitty('
dag {
# Node positions for visualization
exposure [pos="0,1"]
mediator [pos="1,1"]
outcome [pos="2,1"]
confounder [pos="1,0"]
# Edges (arrows)
confounder -> exposure
confounder -> outcome
exposure -> mediator
mediator -> outcome
exposure -> outcome
}
')
# For direct effect
adjustmentSets(dag, exposure = "treatment", outcome = "outcome", effect = "direct")
# For total effect
adjustmentSets(dag, exposure = "treatment", outcome = "outcome", effect = "total")
# Get implied conditional independencies
implied_cis <- impliedConditionalIndependencies(dag)
# Test against data
ci_results <- localTests(dag, data = analysis_data, type = "cis")
# Assess validation
ci_df <- as.data.frame(ci_results)
ci_df$independent <- ci_df$p.value > 0.05
pct_supported <- 100 * mean(ci_df$independent, na.rm = TRUE)
cat(sprintf("DAG support: %.1f%% of implied CIs hold\n", pct_supported))
dag_tidy <- tidy_dagitty(dag)
ggplot(dag_tidy, aes(x = x, y = y, xend = xend, yend = yend)) +
geom_dag_edges(edge_colour = "grey50") +
geom_dag_point(size = 20) +
geom_dag_text(size = 3.5, color = "black") +
theme_dag() +
labs(title = "Causal DAG")
options(mc.cores = 4)
# Standard brms model call
model <- brm(
formula = outcome ~ predictor1 + predictor2 + (1 | group_id),
data = model_data,
family = bernoulli(link = "logit"), # For binary outcomes
prior = priors,
sample_prior = "yes", # For prior-posterior comparison
chains = 4,
cores = 4,
iter = 4000,
warmup = 1000,
control = list(
adapt_delta = 0.95,
max_treedepth = 15
),
seed = 123, # Set seed for reproducibility
backend = "cmdstanr",
file = "models/model_name", # Cache compiled model
file_refit = "on_change" # Only refit if formula/data change
)
Store priors separately and define explicitly:
priors <- c(
prior(normal(0, 2), class = "Intercept"),
prior(normal(0, 1), class = "b"), # Fixed effects
prior(exponential(1), class = "sd"), # Random effect SD
prior(lkj(2), class = "cor") # Correlation priors
)
# Get default priors for a formula
get_prior(outcome ~ predictor + (1 | id), data = data, family = bernoulli())
# Binary outcome
family = bernoulli(link = "logit")
# Count data
family = poisson(link = "log")
family = negbinomial(link = "log")
# Continuous
family = gaussian()
family = student() # Robust to outliers
# Ordinal
family = cumulative(link = "logit")
# Random intercept per participant
outcome ~ predictors + (1 | participant_id)
# Random intercept and slope for time
outcome ~ time + predictors + (1 + time | participant_id)
# Participants nested in groups, items crossed
response ~ predictors + (1 | participant_id) + (1 | item_id)
For longitudinal data, separate between-person and within-person effects:
# Create person-centered variables
model_data <- data |>
group_by(participant_id) |>
mutate(
# Between-person means (stable trait)
predictor_mean = mean(predictor, na.rm = TRUE),
# Within-person deviations (dynamic change)
predictor_dev = predictor - predictor_mean,
# Volatility (person-level SD)
predictor_sd = sd(predictor, na.rm = TRUE)
) |>
ungroup() |>
# Standardize
mutate(
predictor_mean_z = scale(predictor_mean)[, 1],
predictor_dev_z = scale(predictor_dev)[, 1]
)
# Model with both components
model <- brm(
outcome ~ predictor_mean_z + predictor_dev_z + (1 | participant_id),
data = model_data,
family = bernoulli()
)
# Create lagged predictors within person
model_data <- data |>
group_by(participant_id) |>
arrange(time) |>
mutate(
# Lagged values (from previous timepoint)
predictor_lag = lag(predictor, order_by = time),
predictor_dev_lag = lag(predictor_dev, order_by = time)
) |>
ungroup()
# Test if t-1 predicts outcome at t (establishes temporal precedence)
model_lagged <- brm(
outcome ~ predictor_dev_lag_z + predictor_mean_z + (1 | participant_id),
...
)
posterior <- as_draws_df(model)
# Access specific parameter
samples <- posterior$b_predictor_z
# Summary statistics
tibble(
estimate = median(samples),
lower_95 = quantile(samples, 0.025),
upper_95 = quantile(samples, 0.975),
lower_80 = quantile(samples, 0.10),
upper_80 = quantile(samples, 0.90),
prob_negative = mean(samples < 0),
prob_positive = mean(samples > 0)
)
# Convert log-odds to odds ratios
effects_df <- effects_df |>
mutate(
OR = exp(estimate),
OR_lower = exp(lower_95),
OR_upper = exp(upper_95)
)
# P(effect is protective)
prob_protective <- mean(posterior$b_predictor < 0)
# P(effect is harmful)
prob_harmful <- mean(posterior$b_predictor > 0)
# P(|effect| > some threshold)
prob_meaningful <- mean(abs(posterior$b_predictor) > 0.1)
# Test if within-person effect is larger than between-person
diff <- abs(posterior$b_predictor_dev_z) - abs(posterior$b_predictor_mean_z)
prob_within_larger <- mean(diff > 0)
cat(sprintf("P(|within| > |between|) = %.1f%%\n", 100 * prob_within_larger))
# Change in P(outcome) per 1 unit change in predictor
ame <- avg_slopes(
model,
variables = c("predictor1_z", "predictor2_z"),
type = "response" # Probability scale
)
print(ame)
# Predictions at low (-1 SD), mean (0), and high (+1 SD)
predictions <- predictions(
model,
newdata = datagrid(
model = model,
predictor_z = c(-1, 0, 1)
),
type = "response",
re_formula = NA # Population-level (ignore random effects)
)
as.data.frame(predictions) |>
select(predictor_z, estimate, conf.low, conf.high)
plot_predictions(
model,
by = "predictor_z",
type = "response",
re_formula = NA
) +
labs(
title = "Effect of Predictor on Outcome",
x = "Predictor (standardized)",
y = "P(Outcome)"
) +
scale_y_continuous(labels = scales::percent) +
theme_minimal()
# Extract AME from multiple models
ame_model1 <- avg_slopes(model1, variables = "predictor_z", type = "response")
ame_model2 <- avg_slopes(model2, variables = "predictor_z", type = "response")
comparison <- bind_rows(
as.data.frame(ame_model1) |> mutate(model = "Full"),
as.data.frame(ame_model2) |> mutate(model = "Simple")
)
# Trace plots
mcmc_trace(model, pars = c("b_Intercept", "b_predictor_z"))
# R-hat (should be < 1.01)
summary(model)$fixed$Rhat
# Effective sample size (should be > 400)
summary(model)$fixed$Bulk_ESS
summary(model)$fixed$Tail_ESS
pp_check(model)
pp_check(model, type = "stat", stat = "mean")
pp_check(model, type = "stat_2d", stat = c("mean", "sd"))
# Requires sample_prior = "yes" in brm()
prior_summary(model)
# Plot prior vs posterior
mcmc_areas(model, pars = "b_predictor_z", prob = 0.95)
# Extract draws in tidy format
draws <- model |>
spread_draws(b_predictor1_z, b_predictor2_z) |>
mutate(
OR_predictor1 = exp(b_predictor1_z),
OR_predictor2 = exp(b_predictor2_z)
)
# Summarize
draws |>
median_qi(OR_predictor1, OR_predictor2, .width = c(0.80, 0.95))
# Visualize
draws |>
ggplot(aes(x = OR_predictor1)) +
stat_halfeye() +
geom_vline(xintercept = 1, linetype = "dashed") +
labs(x = "Odds Ratio", y = NULL)
localTests()# WRONG: Using contemporaneous predictors when temporal order matters
outcome_t ~ predictor_t # Shows co-occurrence, not temporal precedence
# CORRECT: Use lagged predictors to establish temporal precedence
outcome_t ~ predictor_t_minus_1
# WRONG: Ignoring clustering
brm(outcome ~ predictor, data = longitudinal_data)
# CORRECT: Account for repeated measures
brm(outcome ~ predictor + (1 | participant_id), data = longitudinal_data)
# WRONG: Interpreting within-person effects from between-person variation
# Using person aggregates when you have time-varying data
# CORRECT: Person-mean centering to separate effects
outcome ~ predictor_mean_z + predictor_dev_z + (1 | id)
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.