skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/finance/portfolio-optimization-guide/SKILL.md
Portfolio theory, optimization algorithms, and asset allocation methods
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research portfolio-optimization-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for implementing and researching portfolio optimization methods, from classical mean-variance optimization to modern robust and factor-based approaches. Covers Markowitz theory, Black-Litterman, risk parity, and machine learning-enhanced portfolio construction.
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize
def mean_variance_optimize(expected_returns: np.ndarray,
cov_matrix: np.ndarray,
target_return: float = None,
risk_free_rate: float = 0.02) -> dict:
"""
Markowitz mean-variance optimization.
expected_returns: array of expected returns for each asset
cov_matrix: covariance matrix of asset returns
target_return: target portfolio return (None for max Sharpe)
"""
n_assets = len(expected_returns)
def portfolio_volatility(weights):
return np.sqrt(weights @ cov_matrix @ weights)
def neg_sharpe(weights):
ret = weights @ expected_returns
vol = portfolio_volatility(weights)
return -(ret - risk_free_rate) / vol
# Constraints
constraints = [
{"type": "eq", "fun": lambda w: np.sum(w) - 1}, # weights sum to 1
]
if target_return is not None:
constraints.append(
{"type": "eq", "fun": lambda w: w @ expected_returns - target_return}
)
# Bounds: no short selling (0 to 1 per asset)
bounds = [(0, 1) for _ in range(n_assets)]
# Initial guess: equal weight
w0 = np.ones(n_assets) / n_assets
if target_return is not None:
# Minimize volatility for given return
result = minimize(portfolio_volatility, w0,
bounds=bounds, constraints=constraints)
else:
# Maximize Sharpe ratio
result = minimize(neg_sharpe, w0,
bounds=bounds, constraints=constraints)
weights = result.x
ret = weights @ expected_returns
vol = portfolio_volatility(weights)
return {
"weights": {f"asset_{i}": round(w, 4) for i, w in enumerate(weights)},
"expected_return": round(ret, 4),
"volatility": round(vol, 4),
"sharpe_ratio": round((ret - risk_free_rate) / vol, 4),
}
def compute_efficient_frontier(expected_returns: np.ndarray,
cov_matrix: np.ndarray,
n_points: int = 50) -> list[dict]:
"""
Compute the efficient frontier by solving for minimum variance
portfolios at each target return level.
"""
min_ret = expected_returns.min() * 0.8
max_ret = expected_returns.max() * 1.1
target_returns = np.linspace(min_ret, max_ret, n_points)
frontier = []
for target in target_returns:
try:
result = mean_variance_optimize(
expected_returns, cov_matrix, target_return=target
)
frontier.append({
"return": result["expected_return"],
"volatility": result["volatility"],
"sharpe": result["sharpe_ratio"],
})
except Exception:
continue
return frontier
def black_litterman(market_cap_weights: np.ndarray,
cov_matrix: np.ndarray,
P: np.ndarray,
Q: np.ndarray,
omega: np.ndarray = None,
risk_aversion: float = 2.5,
tau: float = 0.05) -> dict:
"""
Black-Litterman model for combining market equilibrium with
investor views.
market_cap_weights: market-cap weighted portfolio
cov_matrix: covariance matrix
P: pick matrix (k views x n assets), identifies assets in each view
Q: view returns (k x 1), expected returns for each view
omega: view uncertainty (k x k), diagonal matrix
"""
# Step 1: Implied equilibrium returns (reverse optimization)
pi = risk_aversion * cov_matrix @ market_cap_weights
# Step 2: View uncertainty (if not provided, use He-Litterman)
if omega is None:
omega = np.diag(np.diag(tau * P @ cov_matrix @ P.T))
# Step 3: Posterior expected returns
tau_sigma = tau * cov_matrix
inv_tau_sigma = np.linalg.inv(tau_sigma)
inv_omega = np.linalg.inv(omega)
posterior_precision = inv_tau_sigma + P.T @ inv_omega @ P
posterior_cov = np.linalg.inv(posterior_precision)
posterior_mean = posterior_cov @ (inv_tau_sigma @ pi + P.T @ inv_omega @ Q)
return {
"equilibrium_returns": pi.round(4).tolist(),
"posterior_returns": posterior_mean.round(4).tolist(),
"posterior_covariance": posterior_cov.round(6).tolist(),
}
def risk_parity(cov_matrix: np.ndarray, budget: np.ndarray = None) -> dict:
"""
Risk parity: each asset contributes equally to total portfolio risk.
budget: risk budget (default: equal, 1/n each)
"""
n = cov_matrix.shape[0]
if budget is None:
budget = np.ones(n) / n
def objective(weights):
portfolio_vol = np.sqrt(weights @ cov_matrix @ weights)
marginal_risk = cov_matrix @ weights
risk_contribution = weights * marginal_risk / portfolio_vol
target_risk = budget * portfolio_vol
return np.sum((risk_contribution - target_risk) ** 2)
constraints = [{"type": "eq", "fun": lambda w: np.sum(w) - 1}]
bounds = [(0.01, 1) for _ in range(n)]
w0 = np.ones(n) / n
result = minimize(objective, w0, bounds=bounds, constraints=constraints)
weights = result.x
# Verify risk contributions
portfolio_vol = np.sqrt(weights @ cov_matrix @ weights)
marginal_risk = cov_matrix @ weights
risk_contrib = weights * marginal_risk / portfolio_vol
risk_pct = risk_contrib / risk_contrib.sum()
return {
"weights": weights.round(4).tolist(),
"portfolio_volatility": round(portfolio_vol, 4),
"risk_contributions": risk_pct.round(4).tolist(),
"max_risk_deviation": round(np.max(np.abs(risk_pct - budget)), 4),
}
import statsmodels.api as sm
def estimate_factor_exposures(asset_returns: pd.DataFrame,
factor_returns: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""
Estimate asset exposures to Fama-French factors using regression.
factor_returns columns: Mkt-RF, SMB, HML, RMW, CMA (5-factor model)
"""
results = []
for asset in asset_returns.columns:
y = asset_returns[asset] - factor_returns.get("RF", 0)
X = sm.add_constant(factor_returns[["Mkt-RF", "SMB", "HML", "RMW", "CMA"]])
model = sm.OLS(y, X).fit()
results.append({
"asset": asset,
"alpha": round(model.params["const"], 6),
"beta_market": round(model.params["Mkt-RF"], 4),
"beta_size": round(model.params["SMB"], 4),
"beta_value": round(model.params["HML"], 4),
"beta_profit": round(model.params["RMW"], 4),
"beta_invest": round(model.params["CMA"], 4),
"r_squared": round(model.rsquared, 4),
})
return pd.DataFrame(results)
def rebalance_with_costs(current_weights: np.ndarray,
target_weights: np.ndarray,
portfolio_value: float,
cost_per_trade: float = 0.001,
threshold: float = 0.02) -> dict:
"""
Determine rebalancing trades considering transaction costs.
threshold: minimum deviation to trigger rebalancing (2% default)
cost_per_trade: proportional transaction cost (10 bps)
"""
deviations = np.abs(current_weights - target_weights)
needs_rebalance = np.any(deviations > threshold)
if not needs_rebalance:
return {"action": "hold", "reason": "within threshold"}
trades = target_weights - current_weights
trade_value = np.abs(trades) * portfolio_value
total_cost = trade_value.sum() * cost_per_trade
return {
"action": "rebalance",
"trades": trades.round(4).tolist(),
"turnover": np.abs(trades).sum() / 2,
"transaction_cost": round(total_cost, 2),
"cost_as_pct": round(total_cost / portfolio_value * 100, 4),
}
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.