skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/literature/metadata/plumx-metrics-api/SKILL.md
Track research impact beyond citations via PlumX altmetrics API
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research plumx-metrics-apiInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
PlumX (by Elsevier/Plum Analytics) tracks 5 categories of research impact metrics beyond traditional citations: Usage, Captures, Mentions, Social Media, and Citations. It covers 130M+ research artifacts including articles, datasets, presentations, and videos. Available via Elsevier's API infrastructure. Requires an Elsevier API key.
| Category | What it measures | Examples | |----------|-----------------|---------| | Usage | Reading/viewing | Abstract views, PDF downloads, HTML views | | Captures | Saving for later | Mendeley readers, CiteULike bookmarks | | Mentions | Commentary | Blog posts, news articles, Wikipedia refs | | Social Media | Sharing/discussion | Tweets, Facebook shares, Reddit posts | | Citations | Formal references | Scopus, CrossRef, PubMed citations |
https://api.elsevier.com/analytics/plumx/
curl -H "X-ELS-APIKey: $ELSEVIER_API_KEY" \
"https://api.elsevier.com/analytics/plumx/doi/10.1038/nature14539"
# By PubMed ID
curl -H "X-ELS-APIKey: $ELSEVIER_API_KEY" \
"https://api.elsevier.com/analytics/plumx/pmid/25428114"
# By ISBN
curl -H "X-ELS-APIKey: $ELSEVIER_API_KEY" \
"https://api.elsevier.com/analytics/plumx/isbn/9780262035613"
# By Scopus ID
curl -H "X-ELS-APIKey: $ELSEVIER_API_KEY" \
"https://api.elsevier.com/analytics/plumx/scopusId/84920765826"
{
"count_categories": [
{
"name": "capture",
"total": 15432,
"count_types": [
{"name": "READER_COUNT", "total": 15432, "sources": [
{"name": "Mendeley", "total": 15432}
]}
]
},
{
"name": "socialMedia",
"total": 3250,
"count_types": [
{"name": "TWEET_COUNT", "total": 2800},
{"name": "FACEBOOK_COUNT", "total": 450}
]
},
{
"name": "citation",
"total": 2100,
"count_types": [
{"name": "Scopus", "total": 1800},
{"name": "CrossRef", "total": 2100}
]
},
{
"name": "usage",
"total": 45000,
"count_types": [
{"name": "ABSTRACT_VIEWS", "total": 30000},
{"name": "LINK_OUTS", "total": 15000}
]
},
{
"name": "mention",
"total": 85,
"count_types": [
{"name": "NEWS_COUNT", "total": 45},
{"name": "BLOG_COUNT", "total": 25},
{"name": "WIKIPEDIA_COUNT", "total": 15}
]
}
]
}
import os
import requests
API_KEY = os.environ["ELSEVIER_API_KEY"]
BASE_URL = "https://api.elsevier.com/analytics/plumx"
HEADERS = {"X-ELS-APIKey": API_KEY, "Accept": "application/json"}
def get_plumx_metrics(doi: str) -> dict:
"""Get PlumX metrics for a paper by DOI."""
resp = requests.get(
f"{BASE_URL}/doi/{doi}",
headers=HEADERS,
)
resp.raise_for_status()
data = resp.json()
metrics = {}
for cat in data.get("count_categories", []):
category_name = cat["name"]
metrics[category_name] = {
"total": cat["total"],
"breakdown": {},
}
for ct in cat.get("count_types", []):
metrics[category_name]["breakdown"][ct["name"]] = ct["total"]
return metrics
def compare_impact(dois: list) -> list:
"""Compare PlumX metrics across multiple papers."""
results = []
for doi in dois:
metrics = get_plumx_metrics(doi)
results.append({
"doi": doi,
"citations": metrics.get("citation", {}).get("total", 0),
"captures": metrics.get("capture", {}).get("total", 0),
"social": metrics.get("socialMedia", {}).get("total", 0),
"usage": metrics.get("usage", {}).get("total", 0),
"mentions": metrics.get("mention", {}).get("total", 0),
})
return results
# Example: analyze a paper's multi-dimensional impact
metrics = get_plumx_metrics("10.1038/nature14539")
for category, data in metrics.items():
print(f"\n{category.upper()} (total: {data['total']})")
for metric_type, count in data["breakdown"].items():
print(f" {metric_type}: {count}")
# Example: compare two papers
# comparison = compare_impact([
# "10.1038/nature14539",
# "10.1126/science.aax2342",
# ])
| Feature | PlumX | Altmetric.com | Crossref Event Data | |---------|-------|---------------|---------------------| | Metric categories | 5 comprehensive | Attention Score | Events only | | Coverage | 130M+ artifacts | 30M+ outputs | DOI-based | | Social media | Twitter, Facebook, Reddit | Twitter, Reddit, News | Twitter, Reddit, Wikipedia | | Usage data | Yes (views, downloads) | No | No | | Capture data | Yes (Mendeley readers) | Mendeley readers | No | | Free access | Limited | Limited widget | Full API free |
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.