skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/literature/metadata/plumx-metrics-api/SKILL.md
Track research impact beyond citations via PlumX altmetrics API
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research plumx-metrics-apiInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
PlumX (by Elsevier/Plum Analytics) tracks 5 categories of research impact metrics beyond traditional citations: Usage, Captures, Mentions, Social Media, and Citations. It covers 130M+ research artifacts including articles, datasets, presentations, and videos. Available via Elsevier's API infrastructure. Requires an Elsevier API key.
| Category | What it measures | Examples | |----------|-----------------|---------| | Usage | Reading/viewing | Abstract views, PDF downloads, HTML views | | Captures | Saving for later | Mendeley readers, CiteULike bookmarks | | Mentions | Commentary | Blog posts, news articles, Wikipedia refs | | Social Media | Sharing/discussion | Tweets, Facebook shares, Reddit posts | | Citations | Formal references | Scopus, CrossRef, PubMed citations |
https://api.elsevier.com/analytics/plumx/
curl -H "X-ELS-APIKey: $ELSEVIER_API_KEY" \
"https://api.elsevier.com/analytics/plumx/doi/10.1038/nature14539"
# By PubMed ID
curl -H "X-ELS-APIKey: $ELSEVIER_API_KEY" \
"https://api.elsevier.com/analytics/plumx/pmid/25428114"
# By ISBN
curl -H "X-ELS-APIKey: $ELSEVIER_API_KEY" \
"https://api.elsevier.com/analytics/plumx/isbn/9780262035613"
# By Scopus ID
curl -H "X-ELS-APIKey: $ELSEVIER_API_KEY" \
"https://api.elsevier.com/analytics/plumx/scopusId/84920765826"
{
"count_categories": [
{
"name": "capture",
"total": 15432,
"count_types": [
{"name": "READER_COUNT", "total": 15432, "sources": [
{"name": "Mendeley", "total": 15432}
]}
]
},
{
"name": "socialMedia",
"total": 3250,
"count_types": [
{"name": "TWEET_COUNT", "total": 2800},
{"name": "FACEBOOK_COUNT", "total": 450}
]
},
{
"name": "citation",
"total": 2100,
"count_types": [
{"name": "Scopus", "total": 1800},
{"name": "CrossRef", "total": 2100}
]
},
{
"name": "usage",
"total": 45000,
"count_types": [
{"name": "ABSTRACT_VIEWS", "total": 30000},
{"name": "LINK_OUTS", "total": 15000}
]
},
{
"name": "mention",
"total": 85,
"count_types": [
{"name": "NEWS_COUNT", "total": 45},
{"name": "BLOG_COUNT", "total": 25},
{"name": "WIKIPEDIA_COUNT", "total": 15}
]
}
]
}
import os
import requests
API_KEY = os.environ["ELSEVIER_API_KEY"]
BASE_URL = "https://api.elsevier.com/analytics/plumx"
HEADERS = {"X-ELS-APIKey": API_KEY, "Accept": "application/json"}
def get_plumx_metrics(doi: str) -> dict:
"""Get PlumX metrics for a paper by DOI."""
resp = requests.get(
f"{BASE_URL}/doi/{doi}",
headers=HEADERS,
)
resp.raise_for_status()
data = resp.json()
metrics = {}
for cat in data.get("count_categories", []):
category_name = cat["name"]
metrics[category_name] = {
"total": cat["total"],
"breakdown": {},
}
for ct in cat.get("count_types", []):
metrics[category_name]["breakdown"][ct["name"]] = ct["total"]
return metrics
def compare_impact(dois: list) -> list:
"""Compare PlumX metrics across multiple papers."""
results = []
for doi in dois:
metrics = get_plumx_metrics(doi)
results.append({
"doi": doi,
"citations": metrics.get("citation", {}).get("total", 0),
"captures": metrics.get("capture", {}).get("total", 0),
"social": metrics.get("socialMedia", {}).get("total", 0),
"usage": metrics.get("usage", {}).get("total", 0),
"mentions": metrics.get("mention", {}).get("total", 0),
})
return results
# Example: analyze a paper's multi-dimensional impact
metrics = get_plumx_metrics("10.1038/nature14539")
for category, data in metrics.items():
print(f"\n{category.upper()} (total: {data['total']})")
for metric_type, count in data["breakdown"].items():
print(f" {metric_type}: {count}")
# Example: compare two papers
# comparison = compare_impact([
# "10.1038/nature14539",
# "10.1126/science.aax2342",
# ])
| Feature | PlumX | Altmetric.com | Crossref Event Data | |---------|-------|---------------|---------------------| | Metric categories | 5 comprehensive | Attention Score | Events only | | Coverage | 130M+ artifacts | 30M+ outputs | DOI-based | | Social media | Twitter, Facebook, Reddit | Twitter, Reddit, News | Twitter, Reddit, Wikipedia | | Usage data | Yes (views, downloads) | No | No | | Capture data | Yes (Mendeley readers) | Mendeley readers | No | | Free access | Limited | Limited widget | Full API free |
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.